Tuesday, 09 February 2010
Loading...
Advanced search 

Special investigations

Don't fine us - we admitted it - Sasol CEO

Alerted Competition Commission to possible misdemeanours.

David Carte
19 January 2009 18:03

Sasol (JSE:SOL) CEO Pat Davies is hoping that his company will pay no fine for breach of the Competition Act because it proactively confessed the matter to the Competition Commission.

Davies told Moneyweb: "After our experience in the wax division in Europe and the Competition Tribunal's investigation into the fertiliser industry, we started a rigorous review of all our activities across the globe.

"In SA, we appointed the four biggest law firms to go through every subsidiary to uncover anything in breach of the regulations.

"They did unearth certain matters in the piped gas and petroleum division, which we have reported to the Competition Commission. We simultaneously applied for 100% corporate leniency."

The commission's Nandi Mokoena agreed that Sasol volunteered that it might have engaged in anti-competitive conduct. She said the investigation was at a very early stage, so there was no knowing yet what fines might be in store.

The commission normally levies a "consent agreement", which is a fine by any other name. This is usually a percentage of turnover. Sasol's piped gas and petroleum (Sasol Oil) division turns over many billions a year.

The fear of a fine to equal that of Arcelor Mittal's R600m impost drove the share price 2% lower hours after announcement of the leniency application.

Davies said even now most of the matters it has volunteered were not an open and shut case.

"We admit that the German wax case was deliberate illegal behaviour but that is not the case here.

"We are not offering excuses but these are complex issues, where one set of regulations overlaps another. One clause in a contract, for example, was to support a BEE company but it seems to have put us inadvertently in breach."

Sasol is less hopeful that it will be unscathed by the fertiliser investigation, which started in 2003 and was dealt with in the Sasol annual report in 2004. In this case, the investigation started after a complaint by a company called Nutriflo.

He said the lower rand has offset some of the damage wrought by the fallen oil price. Sasol hedged 30% of its production when the oil price was above $100. That will provide some protection at least until May, when Sasol will reconsider its hedges.

Davies says Sasol's investment plans are being reviewed since the oil price plunged from $140/bbl to $43/bbl. It has embarked on an aggressive cost cutting programme but has announced no retrenchments yet.

He said the pre-feasibility and feasibility studies currently in progress would continue but projects would proceed only at economical product prices.

Davies says Sasol's existing plants are fully paid for and can therefore survive low oil prices.

He hopes for a recovery in global prices and takes some hope from President Barack Obama's determination to reduce US dependence on imported oil. The US is rich in coal and Sasol's coal-to-gas and gas-to-liquid technology are obvious solutions.

Write to David Carte: david@moneyweb.co.za


Services

Subscribe to newsletters
News feeds


Print icon  Print story Email icon   Email story

Related Links

Articles:  Competition Commission probes petroleum companies
Transcripts:  Sasol’s competition law compliance review: Pat Davies – CEO, Sasol


COMMENTS

View disclaimer
 
 responses to this article

Pat Davies has a cheek.
Ignorance and inadequate oversight does not excuse them. In any case, in light of their deliberate behaviour in the past, one has difficulty believing their "reasons". I'd be very surprised if an independent investigation did not come up with . .more

by Kevin on January 19 2009, 19:29
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

Davis' claim
Top management, it would seem, is claiming that they are unable to insitute proper controls and corporate governance.
The only decent thing to do is to quit and allow someone competent to take over. Foregoing the bloated salaries, of . .more

by Theseus on January 19 2009, 20:08
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

Too much leniency
Our competition commission seems to be toothless. Companies are getting away with murder. Since when do you rob a bank and then go confess the crime with the hope that you wont be punished since you volunteered the information.

by Tebogo Selamolela on January 19 2009, 20:10
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

now let's see
According to Julius the tsotsi, anyone who counters the ANC is either working for counter revolutionary forces oe else moves by night, fuelled by imperialism to perform his nefarious deeds.
Cutting and pasting this attitude to the commercial . .more

by Cassandra on January 19 2009, 21:57
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

Cut the chase and.....
fine the b*stards. This country has heard too many cases of this nature. They are only willing to admit once they have been caught out. Sounds to me that they have learnt from some of our politicians, with the exception of JZ who carries on without . .more

by Sipho on January 19 2009, 22:02
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

Fine
Fine them.But how will it help the consumer?Will the price of LPG now be reduced.Toyota car prices and milk have not dropped. The big Biz is shameless and arrogant.So what is the use.

by Goofy on January 20 2009, 08:04
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

Dear Goofy
You see there has to be a penalty paid for an infringement. Maybe your reference to Toyota and Milk are excellent examples of monopolies, inelasticity, etc.-which represents another practise which should be investigated as it is in effect price . .more

by Koos on January 20 2009, 08:59
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

hahaha.....hahahahah.....lololol
Come on - admittance only came when they were close to being caught. Sasol has huge funds available - Fine them, and heavily. Put the money into the country's charity system. Whoops, sorry, I meant NOT the ANC's charity system...lololol...a real . .more

by Dave on January 20 2009, 09:24
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

They must pay
I'm actua;;y sick and tired of these CEO or leaders who think that they control everything. They never think of anyone but themselves. He still gets a big bonus for "TELLING THE TRUTH" brother man please. They should have said we are going to reduse . .more

by starshine on January 20 2009, 09:25
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

Fine
Fire management at the time - simply cannot allow these crooks to carry on. This is Nick Dennis again - fire and fine them - and now.

by onlooker on January 20 2009, 10:33
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

A new competitive tactic courtesy of our wonderful Competition Law
Blow the whistle first, avoid all fines, see your competitors fined instead and their top management distracted for months and months by Competition Commission hearings. What a great way to damage your competitors! Could even put them out of . .more

by Meriticrat on January 20 2009, 11:00
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

Fertilizer
OK, but why are the price of fertilizer still prohibitly expensive? Why have the price not come down? Can the Commission perhaps have a look at that too?

David Carte, I urge you to do an atricle on this topic!

by John Deere on January 20 2009, 12:51
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

Fine
I agree with Goofy, they should take the cash from the SASOL fine and explicitly put it towards the education budget.

by Goofy Two on January 20 2009, 13:07
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

fine
Goofy, before they give it to the education dept, they first need to fire the current staff and replace them with honest people and dare I say it, capable people.

by js on January 20 2009, 13:43
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

Fine
We like screwing our consumers. A fine of 1$Billion we will pay with a smile , cash or cheque ?

by Sasol on January 20 2009, 15:40
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

was to support a BEE company
What a scapegoat Pat Davies, hidding behind a BEE company.
BBEE does not promote companies to take illegal acts.

by Maila on January 20 2009, 16:30
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

Profits Gained illegally
They gained these profits illegally and hence should be fined for their corrupt ways. If i steal money from a bank and 6 months later confess to the crime, should I or should i not be held accountable for my actions? According to Sasol - NO.....

by AJT on January 20 2009, 16:31
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

We complain about crime as a nation!!!! We do f@#k all about this type of crime.
In China these chaps would be put before a firing squad. Let's at least jail and fine the turkeys.You wont stop crime until everyone respects the law.

by Lord Ha Ha on January 20 2009, 17:45
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

Chinese way
http://www.iht.com/articles/2007/07/10/news/china.php

by Lord Ha Ha on January 20 2009, 17:49
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

Are you serious ?!
You owned up so you want to get off scot free ?

How about I break into your house, steal everything and sell it or give it away. Then I own up to you that I did it.

Yep - I'm sure 100% leniency would be appropriate.

by Daveza on January 20 2009, 18:19
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

Face the music
Would Pat Davies had admitted it if they had not been investigated?? The answer to that is no. That's like being caught by the police for murder then admitting to the crime, then saying, don't lock me up because I admitted it!! Face the music you . .more

by Airwolf on January 20 2009, 19:10
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it

They think they are above the law.
Well, THEY ARE NOT. It's about time things are set straight and Sasol's Goons should be fired and replaced by intelligent, capable people.

by Angry on January 27 2009, 19:35
Find this comment inappropriate? Report it


Name
Subject
Comment