You are currently viewing our desktop site, do you want to download our app instead?
Moneyweb Android App Moneyweb iOS App Moneyweb Mobile Web App

NEW SENS search and JSE share prices

More about the app

Sick of ourselves, sick of our leaders

Who failed whom in the xenophobic violence that raged across South Africa?

In a series of short films being shown at the Mall of Rosebank as part of the 2008 TriContinental Film Festival, a group called Filmmakers Against Racism (FAR) explored the xenophobic attacks that happened in May this year.

Last night’s selection – Affectionately known as Alex, Angels on our Shoulders, Two Camps, and Martine and Thandeka – was gut-wrenching to watch. The violence was abrupt and awful, the aftermath painful to see.

For those who somehow missed these events, a series of riots raged through South African townships in mid-May. Enraged township residents marched, burned buildings, and attacked foreigners, whom they blame for their miserable material circumstances, killing 62 people, including at least 21 South Africans (see the Wikipedia entry on the attacks).

The attacks resulted in the displacement of up to 100 000 people, according to estimates from the United Nations High Commission for Refugees. As many as 42 000 of these refugees ended up interned in large, temporary camps, where Home Affairs functionaries attempted to process them and manage their reintegration into the communities that attacked them. Those without proper documentation were deported, while many others were issued with temporary ID documents.  

These camps, which still house some residents who remain there because they fear for their safety if they pursue reintegration, now face closure, (see Displaced foreigners prepare to vacate temporary shelters as deadline looms). The courts have granted a temporary stay in the closures, but uncertainty remains (see Court reserves ruling on refugee camps).

The attacks were a frightening and shameful expression of a number of tensions within South African society, and FAR attempted to begin an exploration of these themes.

The films

Last night’s FAR films focused on the experiences of the foreigners involved in the attacks; the filmmakers went into the townships and refugee camps to uncover their stories.

The most interesting work, Affectionately known as Alex, was filmed over several months, starting before the May attacks. Filmed by a visiting American student, Danny Turken, the work features interviews with Alexandra residents who express their dissatisfactions and anger.

In various interviews, Turken’s subjects claim that the RDP houses they should have received were being illegally sold to foreigners by corrupt local officials. One group with which she interacted, the Anti-Privatisation Forum in Alex, presented local government with a petition demanding access to housing and basic services, while chanting anti-immigrant slogans.

From Turken’s film, it seems that, in Alex at least, residents were targeting anger about poor service delivery and poverty at the foreigners living among them.

Debates

Naturally, at last night’s showing, the emotive material drew a strong response from the audience, which was fortunate enough to have three of the filmmakers present to answer questions.

The debate was heated. Blame was tossed from target to target – the media, the government, the ANC, the IFP, the President and a dozen others culprits were named as culpable. Arguments erupted about the role of tribalism, and particularly the role that Zuma’s Zulu-focused campaign for the ANC Presidency played. Voices were raised, along with heckles.

It all reminded me of the great Chinese proverb, “talk does not cook rice”. The problem here, it seems to me, is less to do with politics and ideology than with an age-old human struggle for resources.

The people of Alex, and other townships, are very poor. As citizens of South Africa, they expect government to prioritise their needs, and as voters, they expect their leaders to help them. As citizens and voters, they are entitled to a range of social benefits, from childcare and old age grants to free water and electricity and low-cost housing. They are angry because government ineptitude has meant that they are not getting these things.

What South Africans need is not a series of speeches about African brotherhood, but rather effective, efficient, honest government.

The people interviewed in Turken’s film were very clear. They were angry at the failure of local government to distribute housing in a fair, uncorrupt way. They were tired of struggling to get the water and power connections they had been promised. They wanted government to hear them, and to respond to them.

In a telling scene, ANC president Jacob Zuma addressed a large crowd of angry Alex residents. Although Turken cut most of Zuma’s comments from her film, she and her fellow filmmakers said that Zuma attempted to calm the crowd by reminding them of the debt ANC exiles owed to African nations that supported and housed them during the fight against apartheid.

But the argument didn’t work. Residents told Zuma that they were tired of rhetoric, that they wanted action on their list of complaints. The ANC government has set itself ambitious targets in the field of upliftment and human development. A comprehensive programme of grants and funding should, theoretically, be helping people like the residents of Alex improve their circumstances.

But inefficiency, corruption, laziness and a lack of accountability mean that many areas of government do not function competently. Although the violence against foreigners is inexcusable, and all South Africans should be ashamed of what happened, it is at least comprehensible.

Desperately poor people perceive themselves to be in a pitched battle against their neighbours in pursuit of the scarce resources distributed by government. It is unsurprising, if disappointing and heart-breaking, that their frustration should land on a defenceless group who can be victimised without repercussions.

Government and leaders failed South Africans twice in this sad tale. First, they failed to govern fairly, honestly and effectively, and to thus prevent the violence. Then they failed to condemn, punish and stop the attacks.

The people of South Africa deserve better.

VIDEOS

COMMENTS   12

Sort by:
  • Oldest first
  • Newest first
  • Top voted

Comments on this article are closed.

Nil

This xenophobic thing is finished.

At the time when it happenned i cam on TV and said it was unacceptable; Unfortunately i couldn’t actually get into the townships because they smell too much and I have a tender disposition.

After the events I had a solemn service of reconciliation at which I stated clearly that all foreigners are now regarded as being fully integrated in our communities. I said it so it must be true

So there.

Problem solved.

Actually, it might never have happened. Come to think of it, it didn’t happen.

Now I am sure it was all the fault of certain media interests who want SA to fail.

Any way Charlie Ngakoola has said clearly that if you don’t like the situation you are free to go.

2 things-even though the poeple are tired now they will never vote for someone else. It takes 3 decades for them to see the wood for the trees. And people are too stupid to vote.

Felicity is this COMMENT on SA leaders or Report on xenophobia?

Well, seeing as this in the BLOG section, not the NEWS section, I think the answer is obvious

whats the difference slimkop? the one you get attorneys to check first before publishing, the other you have a blank check and write as you please, under the banner “freedom of speech”

Those of us that don’t have satellite TV and are obliged to watch SABC2’s Olympic coverage are being shown selected events where African athletes (or athletes of African extraction) take part and are being extorted to support the “African Flag” (God only knows what that is) and our fellow “Brothers and Sisters”.

The irony is that these are athletes are friends and relatives of the self-same people that were being murdered and terrorised during the May xenophobic attacks.

Is there any limit to ANC hypocracy and the mindless people that support them ??

Yes, domkop, that’s the difference

twice you couldn’t spell my virtual name, jou PLANK-KOP!!

SA takes gold at the xenophobic, corruption, incompetence,criminal and immorality events. Eish…… we are so proud

Sam Shilowa now says that these shelters cannot stay “forever”.

Presumably the funding that it absorbs is needed for misappropriation elsewhere.

Well my brothers , i am proud to be black and elite rich but not say a word .

Yes the african black proud man and women have phuked this country up like the rest of Africa .

the black IQ 69 can take more ANC rubbish , eish as we are too stupid eish .

But dont worry out African brotherhood will win VIVA NO JOB VIVA .

VIVA ITS THE AFRICAN WAY VIVA >

The Bell Curve is Correct as the UCT said that whites must get 91 % to pass and Blacks 70% to pass , that was what i was told today .

So the Blacks have admitted that they are phuking stupid and the Bell Curve is Correct as the blacks do not have the brain ANC power to Cut IT .

They , the blacks have proved that they can not cut it .

The Bell Curve is True and Correct .

Less IQ = Less Marks = ANC says you pass because you are black .

What a Racist ANC Thug Government .

The UCT is just as BAD as The ANC .

If you are not Black you are Phuked in SA .

End of comments.

LATEST CURRENCIES  

USD / ZAR
GBP / ZAR
EUR / ZAR
BTC / USD

Podcasts

INSIDER SUBSCRIPTION APP VIDEOS RADIO / LISTEN LIVE SHOP OFFERS WEBINARS NEWSLETTERS TRENDING

Follow us:

Search Articles:
Click a Company: