Wealth tax unlikely, says audit firm EY

Budget is expected to focus on the trend of tax enforcement and improved collections.
Rough road for taxpayers with audits, tougher enforcement, says the author. Image: Shutterstock

South Africa’s 2021 budget, which will be presented on Wednesday, is unlikely to see the introduction of a wealth tax or any other significant tax increases, but rather further steps to ensure tax enforcement and collection.

Read: Promising collection signs alleviate pressure for tax increases

Moneyweb Insider INSIDERGOLD

Subscribe for full access to all our share and unit trust data tools, our award-winning articles, and support quality journalism in the process.

Choose an option:

R63 per month
R630 per year SAVE R126

You will be redirected to a checkout page.
To view all features and options, click here.

A monthly subscription is charged pro rata, based on the day of purchase. This is non-refundable and includes a R5 once-off sign-up fee.
A yearly subscription is refundable within 14 days of purchase and includes a 365-day membership.

Click here for more information.

The budget trend since 2019 has mainly been to equip the South Africa Revenue Service (Sars) to enhance tax enforcement and improve tax collections. We do not anticipate a significant departure from this focus in this month’s budget.

However, EY continues to be of the view that a phased-in reduction of corporate tax rates, however unpopular, could help drive South Africa’s trade, economic reform and competitiveness.

The corporate tax rate cut is a matter of when. It is also particularly important in the wake of the pandemic to help corporate South Africa restore finances and by extension, reduce the risk of further job losses.

While the introduction of a wealth tax appears politically attractive, the jury is out as to whether such a tax would achieve its objective better than other alternatives.

A wealth tax that raises substantial tax revenues in an efficient manner should be welcome but only if that tax is also fair and difficult to avoid.

Critically, because of the complexities in the design and administration of such a tax, it is not a policy direction SA should rush into without a wider public consultation process.

Tax gap

Despite a lack of clarity about how much additional enforcement capacity currently exists in Sars, some taxpayers can expect a more adversarial relationship with Sars as it pulls all the levers of its powers to enforce compliance to bridge the ‘tax gap’. The tax gap is the difference between the true amount of taxes owed in any given tax year and the amount that is paid on time.

We expect an uptick in audits plus a more rigorous application and interpretation of tax law. This will inevitably result in more disputes as compliance behaviour comes under the spotlight.

Taxpayers should gear up for more regular ‘settlement’ negotiations with Sars as well as a greater willingness to go to court.

A poorly-coordinated or overly aggressive enforcement programme by Sars risks eroding the remaining trust and cooperation between compliant taxpayers and the tax administration.

Ekow Eghan is EY’s South Africa Tax Leader.


Sort by:
  • Oldest first
  • Newest first
  • Top voted

You must be signed in to comment.


I am all for paying more tax, if it is spent responsibly and assist in making SA a better place for all.
If not, then I have the option to not make use of SARS’s service and just like Eskom or SAA, go off-grid.

I am definitely not for paying more tax no matter what. Personal tax levels in SA are already at similar levels to European companies but with the tax payers receiving nothing back. If the SA tax situation was replicated in Europe and most other developed countries one would see rioting in the streets and governments falling.

In SA most people who have made adequate provision for their retirement would fall into the class of persons who are subjected to the wealth tax. The lowest wealth tax figure I have seen is 3% per year. There is the widely accepted rule of thumb that one can safety take 4% of ones retirement capital per year. So if 3% of the capital is taken for tax then pensioners would have to live on 1% of their retirement capital or go bust well before they die. In reality this would result in all pensioners living in poverty and negate any desire that any person had to make provision for their retirement.

Wealth tax may not be necessary. SARS have re-programmed their Penalty-system for non-compliance (e.g. non- or late submission of returns).
Since this week, SARS is dishing out penalty notices left right and center this week. By the time Min Mboweni delivers the Budget tomorrow, SARS would indicate to him , he can add Rxbillion in SARS penalties cover the future shortfall.

End of comments.




How much do you earn per year?
How old are you?

Total tax:
Income after tax:

Total tax:
Income after tax:
Moneyweb is a financial, investment news provider and not a tax- or financial advice authority. Please contact Sars or a registered tax practitioner for any tax-related queries.


  CPIThe Consumer Price Index (CPI) measures monthly changes in prices for a range of consumer products Feb 2021 3.20%
  CPI ex OERThe Consumer Price Index excluding Owners’ Equivalent Rent (CPI ex OER) measures monthly changes in prices for a range of consumer products excluding Owners’ equivalent rent that measures changes in the cost of owner-occupied housing Feb 2021 3.40%
  RepoThe rate at which the Reserve Bank lends money to the country’s commercial banks and set by the Reserve Bank’s Monetary Policy Committee. Mar 2021 3.50%
  Prime lendingThe Prime Lending Rate is the rate of interest that commercial banks will charge their clients when issuing a loan (home loan or vehicle finance) Feb 2021 7.00%

Follow us:

Search Articles: Advanced Search
Click a Company: