Moneyweb closer to access Nova shareholder register

ConCourt denies Nova directors leave to appeal against SCA judgement.

Moneyweb is another step closer to accessing the shareholder registers of the three companies that today own and manage the erstwhile Sharemax Investment Properties, in which more than 33 000 people (mostly elderly) invested R4.5 billion.

The Constitutional Court denied the directors of the three companies leave to appeal against an earlier Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA) ruling and order them to pay Moneyweb’s legal costs. This ruling found that a company cannot refuse anyone access to its shareholder register after a proper application in terms of Section 26 of the Companies Act. The SCA further proclaimed that Section 26 gives the applicant an unqualified right to access the register and that the motive for seeking access is irrelevant.

Dominique Haese, CEO of Nova, argued in the application for leave to appeal that the Bill of Rights should allow a company to refuse access under certain circumstances, and that the motive for accessing the registers “may” be relevant if the information will be used unlawfully.

The Constitutional Court did not agree and dismissed the application as “it lacks prospects of success”.

Read the full Constitutional Court judgement here.

Read Haese’s affidavit here.


More than three years ago

This judgement follows Moneyweb journalist Julius Cobbett’s original application to access the shareholder registers of Nova Property Group Holdings, Frontier Asset Management and Centro Property Group in terms of Section 26 of the Companies Act in July 2013 – more than three years ago.

The directors of these companies vehemently denied Moneyweb access alleging that Cobbett and Moneyweb waged a vendetta against the directors and that the information will be used unlawfully to defame them.

There is immense public interest in this case as the registers will reveal who the shareholders of the companies that now own and manage the ex-Sharemax properties are. The investors in the Sharemax scheme were actually shareholders in the properties they invested in, but after the scheme failed, the properties were consolidated into Nova with the overwhelming number of investors becoming debenture holders in Nova.

Frontier and Centro provide management and support services to these properties.

Cobbett and Moneyweb’s application should reveal who now owns these properties.

With the announcement of the scheme of arrangement in 2011, the executive directors of the Sharemax group, Haese, Rudi Badenhorst and Dirk Koekemoer held 43.2% of Nova’s issued shares. Haese, Badenhorst and Koekemoer are now directors of Nova. Connie Myburgh is the fourth Nova director.

This Constitutional Court judgement is not only a victory for the 33 000 investors, but also for the media as Section 26 is aimed at allowing journalists to quickly and easily gain access to companies’ shareholder registers.

The three companies will have to pay Moneyweb’s legal costs for both the SCA and the application for leave to appeal to the Constitutional Court. 

Haese and Myburgh did not respond to emailed questions prior to publication.

Oops! We could not locate your form.



Sort by:
  • Oldest first
  • Newest first
  • Top voted

You must be signed in and an Insider Gold subscriber to comment.


Thank you Moneyweb for seeking information and justice for these crooks who have brought untold misery on so many trusting investors.

Well done Ryk and Moneyweb!
The timeline is just one more proof that our justice system is in need of a serious overhaul.
Courts and court procedures are for the most part still stuck in the nineteenth century (yes, not even the twentieth).

Well done Ryk!
Now you must go after Glyniss Breytenbach, former NPA prosecutor, who declined to prosecute the Sharemax directors on the basis that there was not enough proof of their crimes….

They must be jailed for a long time, with handcuffs on unless they are eating, which I begrudge them. I was not an investor, but know a couple of elderly people who were. They are now in chains for the rest of their lives. They rely on charity from their families. Fortunately their children are wealthy in their own right. So it is quite appropriate for them to be handcuffed. Leg irons and the big iron ball seen in comic strips wouldn’t go amiss, either!

So when do we get to see the shareholding?

End of comments.



Subscribe to our mailing list

* indicates required
Moneyweb newsletters

Instrument Details  

You do not have any portfolios, please create one here.
You do not have an alert portfolio, please create one here.

Follow us:

Search Articles:
Click a Company: