MENU
 
 Registered users can save articles to their personal articles list. Login here or sign up here

Van Loggerenberg: The KPMG report was false

Dismisses the company’s apology out of hand.

One of the men targeted in the KPMG/Sars ‘rogue unit’ report has publicly slammed the company for its apology and has requested the firm retract the entire report. 

Johan van Loggerenberg was one of the executives ousted from the tax collection authority following the release of the report, which KPMG has since apologised for, and formally retracted the key findings of. But that is simply not enough, says Van Loggerenberg, who on Wednesday issued a statement via his lawyers. 

In it, he describes how he has been attempting to meaningfully engage KPMG on the report for the last two years, beginning in October 2015. “[I] have found them to be unresponsive, and their communiques (when they did bother to reply) to be dismissive, evasive, inadequate, and displaying scant regard for the laws and rules of the audit profession and the basic human rights of individuals.”

Van Loggerenberg goes on to say that the retraction of the “Summary, conclusions, findings and recommendations” falls far short of the legal and moral obligations to correct the wrongs caused by the report and the process leading up to its publication. Of the litany of flaws, omissions, misstatements of fact, selective inclusions, including allegations that are “illogical, unattributed, unsubstantiated and unsupported by facts” Van Loggerenberg says the report contains, he believes KPMG SA was obliged to disassociate itself from the report in its totality when it was made aware of these issues. 

Further, and in light of the attempts KPMG made to apologise for its actions, Van Loggerenberg believes the apologies “are totally inadequate when measured against the immense harm caused to the economy, the country, a key state institution and many innocent individuals, their families and friends – most of whom had no voice to defend themselves throughout the ordeal”. 

If the assertions made by Van Loggerenberg and others are true, it must surely pave the way for civil litigation that could potentially result in damage claims that run to millions and tens of millions of rands. The statement concludes with the assertion that Van Loggerenberg is taking legal advice and is considering the most appropriate action to take going forward. 

This might just be the beginning of the music KPMG is about to face. 

AUTHOR PROFILE

COMMENTS   4

To comment, you must be registered and logged in.

LOGIN HERE

Don't have an account?
Sign up for FREE

I think KPMG is to Auditing and integrity what dog is to tree!

We should stop fooling ourselves – KPMG think we are all just ”Out Of Africa” anyway.

I had a long conversation with Barry Sergeant years ago and he informed me that KPMG only ”paid him lip service” after his reports/book on the Kebble/JC/Randgold with regards to their collusion with Investec!

I think they are just ”legalised crooks” that was granted a licence to operate down here!

Now how about an apology from Sars and Tom Moyane.

The capture of Sars is far, far worse than anything KPMG did. Have any Zuptas been prosecuted for tax evasion? No. Has anything been done about Jonas Makwakwa and his girlfriend – besides suspending him on full pay? No.

Time to turn the spotlight on Sars.

The looting by the elite can only happen if SARS turns a blind eye. SARS is complicit in criminal activity. Try hiding income and see how long it takes for them to come after you.

Shut the company down. Arrest uncle Tom from sars and flush out that institution.

Load All 4 Comments
No more Comments, leave a reply.

LATEST CURRENCIES  

ZAR / USD
ZAR / GBP
ZAR / Euro

Podcasts

GO TO SHOP CART

Follow us:

Search Articles:Advanced Search
Click a Company:
server: 172.17.0.2