Looking at the big picture

Emerging markets are a no brainer.

We are constantly told, as investors big and small, that we must invest with the long term in mind. We are reminded that there are no quick gains or easy wins and we should stick it out through the cycles. That’s all fine, but why then is investment comment all about what the market is doing today, tomorrow and next week?

Where is the big picture perspective? Under these noisy and volatile circumstances it can sometimes be quite difficult to stay the course.

I want to use the recent reporting on emerging markets as an example. Recent headlines about emerging markets are feeding a certain narrative: “Geopolitical risks weigh heavily on emerging markets” (Moneyweb May 14 th ), “This is a dangerous market – Morgan Stanley emerging markets chief” (Businesslive June 26 th ), “US-China trade war: Emerging markets most at risk” (Fin24 June 28th), and “The biggest threats to emerging market ETFs” (ETF.com July 5 th ).

It’s true there has been significant volatility in EM’s this year – fuelled by global and local politics. By the end of 2018 there will have been 24 elections within emerging market countries. That’s enough to give most investors the heebie-jeebies, without factoring in rising protectionism and trade-wars. So we can expect EM volatility to continue as the likelihood of election surprises and non-market friendly policies continues.

Add to this a strong dollar, rising interest rates and a steadily increasing oil price – all of which create challenges for EMs.

In addition, investments in the west seem poised for growth: S&P 500 companies are on track to post strong earnings compared with last year as the economy grows and US tax reform drives capital investment.

Put all of this together and the selloff in EM currencies and stocks seems to make sense. But does it really? I can’t help thinking that some investors have been very quick to dismiss EMs as too risky.

I recently read the book Factfulness by Swedish public health professor Hans Rosling, which is a lesson in big picture thinking – in fact it changed my outlook on the world. He notes that of the 7.6 billion people on the planet today, roughly 1 billion live across North and South America, 1 billion in Europe, 1 billion in Africa and 4 billion in Asia (numbers have been rounded).

By the end of the century, according to UN statistics, there will have been no population change in the Americas and Europe, but there will be 3 billion more people in Africa and 1 billion more in Asia. In other words more than 80% of the world’s population will live in Africa and Asia.

To some people, who picture impoverished communities with little access to health-care and education, this is a scary picture. However Rosling paints a completely different picture of the world today and in the future, using verifiable statistics.

He divides the world into four income levels, expressed in terms of dollars of income per day. According to this 1 billion people live on level 1 at less than $2/day; 3 billion live on less than $8/day (level 2); 2 billion live on less than $32/day (level 3) and the balance – about a billion people – live above that on level 4.

At current levels of progress, by 2040 half a billion people will remain on level one, while 2.5 billion will have moved to level 2 and over 4 billion people will be on level 3. Just over 3 billion will have moved to level 4. This represents significant change.

Also, think about this. Today, 60% of level 4 consumers live in Europe and North America. By 2040 60% of level 4 consumers will live outside the West.

It may sound overly dramatic but Western domination of the world economy will soon be over. Surprisingly enough, I think the person who understands this best is Donald Trump – it explains his bullying behaviour.

So if you and I are investing for the looooong term, where should we look?

One set of investors that seems to look beyond the noise is investment firm Grantham, Mayo, & van Otterloo, more commonly known as GMO. This is the team, under investment strategist Jeremy Grantham that predicted the dotcom bubble in 2000 and the housing bubble in 2007.

To be fair, I should add that the nature of Grantham’s approach means that GMO tends to underperform during bull markets and  outperform when markets correct. This means that over the past few years the firm’s funds have underperformed many of their peers and  clients have apparently withdrawn $40 billion since 2014.

That said, the man is a legend and I tend to read research the firm puts out. A wee while ago GMO released the latest in its 7-year asset class forecasts, which suggests that emerging market equities are likely to generate the best real returns over the next seven years.

Makes you think, doesn’t it?

Happy investing, Sasha. 

Please consider contributing as little as R20 in appreciation of our quality independent financial journalism.



You must be signed in to comment.




The Budget Speech explained
Moneyweb’s 2020 national budget offering, including infographics and audio ratings, as well as past budget coverage....

The Investor Issue 48
Separating out the noise from useful information in the markets is not easy. The trick to staying the course is to keep an eye on ...

The Investor Issue 47
Some people intuitively understand that investing for future gain is a long-term process that cannot be rushed. The management of ...

The Investor Issue 46
While US innovation soars and its tech listings continue at a ferocious pace, SA has no real plan for how to embrace the 4th Indus...

The Investor Issue 45
As the investment world falls more and more in love with the simplicity that ETF investing offers, index providers are realising t...

The Investor Issue 44
Company financial statements are the last line of defence for investors wanting to protect their investments. But these cannot alw...

The Investor Issue 43
What makes one CEO great and another mediocre? The Moneyweb Investor ponders this and other leadership questions in the latest iss...

The Investor Issue 42
Stagnant economic growth and questionable economic policy is hampering the development of mid-sized - and investible - businesses ...

The Investor Issue 41
If you are one of those people who invests more energy into your credit card or medical aid rewards programme than you do your ret...

The Investor Issue 40
Volatility in global markets is higher than it has been in years, giving investors the jitters. Some 'experts' are suggesting a re...

The Investor Issue 39
From lessons from Buffet to building your own crypto-portfolio (a risky endeavour by anyone's standards), this issue of The Moneyw...

The Investor Issue 38
They say the art of investing is to ignore the short-term noise and focus on attaining long-term goals. That's true, but that does...

The Investor Issue 37
Getting the economy on the correct footing requires that everyone pulls their weight. Our writers this month have gone above and b...

The Investor Issue 36
The past year is littered with train wrecks like Steinhoff, SAA and Eskom. But there is real sense of ‘back to business’ in So...

The Investor Issue 35
Stock markets are soaring, but productivity is not. Innovation continues, but leads to fewer new jobs. And the great and the good ...

The Investor Issue 34
South Africans are fed up with corruption, or anything that has even a whiff thereof, as JSE rockstar Naspers is currently experie...

The Investor Issue 33
As the year races towards its close, investors will be forgiven for feeling a little breathless. The British WWII propaganda phras...

The Investor Issue 32
Anyone would think that getting an economy moving is rocket science. It's actually not. It requires single-minded commitment. Whil...

The Investor Issue 31
We examine the opportunities of forex trading, the best unit trusts, e-commerce at Richemont and more. ...

The Investor Issue 30
Despite what the astrologers say, there are no shortcuts when it comes to successful stock picking. Fundamental analysis counts. T...


Follow us:

Search Articles:
Click a Company: