Enabling investment into alternative assets

How SA can overcome the obstacles related to private equity, infrastructure and hedge funds.
Renewable energy projects can be beneficial to the economy, but pension fund members and other investor groups often don’t have the opportunity to benefit as they are generally unlisted. Picture: Shutterstock

The Minister of Energy, Jeff Radebe, signed contracts worth almost R56 billion with 27 independent renewable energy producers early in April after significant delays.

The projects are expected to create thousands of jobs and to lower electricity costs.

While such projects can be beneficial to an economy in desperate need of job creation, the reality is that pension fund members and other investor groups often don’t have the opportunity to benefit from such investments as they are generally unlisted.

Regulation 28 of the Pension Funds Act, which governs the maximum allocation to various asset classes, is relatively friendly towards alternative investments. It allows pension funds to invest up to 15% in these assets. The allocation to hedge funds and private equity is capped at 10% each.

The reality however, is that pension funds are generally not using these allowances.

Other investors in this space include ultra-high-net-worth individuals, foundations and family offices. Historically, banks and life insurers were also large participants in the alternative space, but changes to regulation (Basel III for example) mean that it is less capital efficient for them to invest in this area. The conversion from a defined benefit to a defined contribution pensions landscape – which effectively moved the investment and longevity risk from the employer to the individual – also means that investors have changed from large sophisticated firms with lots of money and patience to individuals who are generally less sophisticated and who have less money and patience.

Unfortunately, there is really only a handful of South African investors large and sophisticated enough to participate in alternative investments, says Chris Roelofse, head of alternative investments at STANLIB Multi-Manager. “Therefore, not enough money is going to these investments.”

While alternative investments tend to offer higher long-term returns than traditional assets like listed equities, bonds and cash, behave differently to other investments and have a strong social impact, most investors are unable to embrace the asset class.

Roelofse says alternative investments are often private, unlisted investments and are generally very complex. Investors need to know what they are doing and understand what will drive the value of the investment as they can’t rely on regulators for due diligence.

Moreover, if a pension fund decides that the job creation and return prospects of a private equity fund are attractive, the fund will most likely have to invest a minimum of R50 million to get access to a single fund with only a handful of investments and that require investors to lock-up their investment for at least ten years, making it an extremely illiquid investment.

Even if the fund could manage to overcome these obstacles, it is not as easy as writing a cheque. The investor generally has to commit and hold the money as liquid cash to be able to meet drawdowns as and when the private equity manager requires, Roelofse adds.

“This is just not something that most investors are set up to do. It is a hassle, it is complicated and therefore, despite the initial excitement about what the investment can offer, they just never end up executing on the investment because the barriers are just too high.”

The extended equity bull market investors have enjoyed has also created a degree of complacency. Investors likely reached their medium-term investment targets by merely allocating a sizeable portion of their portfolio to equities. But listed equity is cyclical which makes it vulnerable to the next market downturn. In such market conditions it benefits investors to have investments that are uncorrelated to listed markets and not as volatile as listed equities.

Roelofse says it would not be practical to expect any investor to put the majority of their money into these types of illiquid and complex investments, but the industry has to find ways to better enable investors to access alternatives alongside other traditional investments.

“It is the industry’s responsibility to create a friendlier point of access to these investments.”

To do this, Roelofse believes fund managers with specialist knowledge and research teams should identify a variety of these investments, combine them in one large pool and then allow investors to participate with relatively smaller amounts of money whilst also having the option to cash out if they need to. At the same time, the manager should take care of the complexity and governance requirements needed.

STANLIB Multi-Manager already manages R8 billion in this way with Roelofse as the portfolio manager for the past six years.

Against this background, STANLIB Multi-Manager will be launching a number of pooled funds in the alternative space in May. It aims to overcome the various barriers to entry by allowing a minimum investment of R1 million and access to the funds at three months’ notice. Qualified investors will get access to a regulated pooled vehicle through a globally diversified fund-of-funds that offers instant access to various alternative asset classes – including infrastructure, private equity, private real estate, hedge funds and more.

Brought to you by STANLIB Multi-Manager. 



Sort by:
  • Oldest first
  • Newest first
  • Top voted

You must be signed in to comment.


“The projects are expected to create thousands of jobs and to lower electricity costs”.

Please supply evidence that Eskom purchasing electricity for R0.85 per kWh from IPPs will lower electricity costs when the marginal cost of producing the same kWh is R0.30 to R0.40 from existing coal-fired power stations.

Please supply evidence of sustainable mass jobs creation that has accompanied such investments anywhere.

Please supply evidence that these investments would be in anyway sustainable without economic distortions such as carbon taxes and subsidies.

These investments are complex. Really? The issue is transparency not complexity. I suspect that these investments are such no brainers that public funding is neither wanted nor required. After all who wants to share super profits? Eskom is forced by the ANC to purchase electricity it does not need, at a much higher price. Lack of transparency and competition thus line the pockets of these overseas investors who fleece the SA taxpayer and electricity users while the chickens sing their praises on their march to KFC.

Such patsies and so many of them.

Inge Lambrecht – Kindly note that in South Africa and under S.A. law, there are no such thing as private equity ‘family offices’ (your paragraph 6). It’s a USA concept that is not practiced in S.A. – i.e. Warren Buffet initially started out with a private equity family office fund.


B.S. Baffles Brains.

…Also …Buffet did not invent the family office concept (private equity, or otherwise) … it has existed in Europe for hundreds of years, … the 1st publicly noticed USA family office happened to be the Carnegie Melon family office, based in Pittsburg, and only so because it was titled as a family office … older similar models have existed in the USA, and known as Unincorporated Business Organizations (UBOs) …, of which Brown Brothers Harriman is one of the better known ones…

I founded a family office (which is why we left ZA) … In Europe to our family’s succession and continuity planning after years of investigating a means to do so in ZA … the mechanism for a family office simply does not exist under ZA law.

End of comments.



Follow us:

Search Articles:
Click a Company: