You are currently viewing our desktop site, do you want to download our app instead?
Moneyweb Android App Moneyweb iOS App Moneyweb Mobile Web App

Fairtree Smart Beta fund taken over by Stanlib

The fund aims to maintain a beta of 0.9 to 1.1, and an alpha target of 3% to 4% over a rolling three to five-year period: Wehmeyer Ferreira, Stanlib Index Investments.

This month Stanlib officially took over the management of what was previously the Fairtree Smart Beta Prescient fund. The fund will now be known as the Stanlib Enhanced Multi Style Equity fund.

The strategy was launched by Citywire AA-rated Rademeyer Vermaak in February 2016, when he was quantitative fund manager at Fairtree Capital. In December last year Vermaak moved to Stanlib, where he is currently head of portfolio management for the Index Investments business.

The fund has now been transferred to Stanlib, with Vermaak retaining management of the portfolio.

Identifying fundamentals
‘Before he launched the fund, Rademeyer put a lot of time into investigating the factor space both globally and in South Africa,’ said Wehmeyer Ferreira, chief operations officer at Stanlib Index Investments. ‘He had a firm belief that if you are able to identify the key fundamental factors – that is something that is persistent through a business cycle and drives stock returns– then those factors should perform well both locally and globally.’

Since its inception to the end of September, the fund had produced an annualised return of 2.72%. This was against a 1.92% return from the FTSE/JSE Capped Swix All Share index.

Over the past three years, it is a top quintile performer amongst the South African equity funds monitored by Citywire.

The fund’s multi-factor strategy allocates equally to five factors: value, volatility, quality, momentum and investment.

Bottom-up, not top-down
‘Investment is probably the one that is least understood,’ said Ferreira. ‘It comes from a recent Fama and French paper which states that companies that reinvest earnings conservatively fare better than companies that reinvest earnings aggressively.

‘So, this factor identifies companies that tend to be more shareholder friendly. It would place a higher value on companies that don’t simply focus on retaining their earnings to grow their asset base, but rather on improving profitability or returning the cash.’

The fund also differentiates itself through its bottom-up approach to allocation.

‘A lot of factor managers allocate top-down,’ said Ferreira. ‘Effectively they would take a value smart beta fund, a momentum smart beta fund, a quality smart beta fund and combine them.

‘But you lose some of the essence that way because your value fund might invest in cheap companies, but at the  expense of quality, and your quality fund might not consider valuations. By adding these two offsetting positions, you just get something average.

‘In a bottom-up approach, you apply a factor lens to each share, to get a multi-factor score per share. You then take that score and construct a portfolio.’

Portfolio construction
To create the final portfolio, each share’s multi-factor score is considered together with its risks and its weight in the fund’s benchmark – the Capped Swix.

‘A company with a higher multi-factor score is, in our view, better than one with a low multi-factor score,’ said Ferreira. ‘We take that score along with its correlations, plus the share’s weighting in the index and its sector and put that into an optimiser to generate what we see as the optimal combination of shares within our parameters.

‘A share’s weighting in the portfolio is a function of its weight in the index and its multi-factor score. So, for instance, a share that has 30 basis point weight in the index but has the best multi-factor score out is not going to be 10% of the fund, because that would be detrimental from a risk and liquidity point of view.’

He added that the fund has an objective of maintaining a beta of between 0.9 and 1.1, and an alpha target of 3% to 4% over a rolling three to five-year period.

Asset allocation
Ferreira added that this fund behaves similarly to an unconstrained actively-managed local equity fund, but with some advantages.

‘You would see some volatility, alpha, and high active share,’ said Ferreira. ‘You would see a top 10 that is very different to the underlying benchmark. But it probably has a more predictable alpha profile. It also has low correlation to conventional fundamental managers, so we think it is a great addition to an equity building block where you combine various managers.’

In his view, it offers additional risk mitigation simply by virtue of being a quant strategy.

‘Sometimes in fundamental active equity you have high key person risk,’ said Ferreira. ‘But even though Rademeyer was instrumental in the design of the strategy, if he wasn’t around any more, we have portfolio managers and analysts who can manage the fund in the same way.’

Patrick Cairns is South Africa Editor at Citywire, which provides insight and information for professional investors globally.

This article was first published on Citywire South Africa here, and republished with permission.


Sort by:
  • Oldest first
  • Newest first
  • Top voted

You must be signed in to comment.


As in SA’s construction & other sectors, consolidation will also arrive at the asset management / stock broker industry.

The bigger ones will gulp up the smaller funds, as less and less money goes around in Azania. Pressure on profits due to shrinking economies of scale.

Lots of confusing statements in my opinion. Firstly multi-factor funds have been beaten to death and reincarnated so many times. There are absolutely nothing new in that space – commoditised by passives. Secondly “to get a multi-factor score per share” – that is how all of the proper ones work. Thirdly “offers additional risk mitigation simply by virtue of being a quant strategy” but targeting a beta of essentially 1 and investing in the same equities as others. Hugh!? Through the cycle you will end-up with the average return minus fees.

Does it not make you think and question all this smart thinking, formulas, models, analyzes helps nothing in the JSE/SA?

Best model for success I learnt in 2020 is to keep your money in the Bank or your pocket.

When I hear the word invest, I think of losing my money.

Unless if you had invested offshore on the US stock markets or local gold and platinum shares.

Even properties lost value.

End of comments.





Follow us:

Search Articles:Advanced Search
Click a Company: