Proudly sponsored by

‘Fed’ up?

Indications are that rates will rise sooner than expected.
South Africa does however seem less vulnerable than during the previous period of tightening US monetary policy. Image: Erin Scott/Bloomberg

Meetings of the US Federal Reserve’s Open Markets Committee (FOMC) are always a big deal for global markets, as they determine the path of the world’s most important interest rate. Virtually all financial assets are in some way priced directly or indirectly off the Fed’s policy interest rate, the federal funds rate.

Most meetings end up being uneventful, but occasionally a slight shift in the Fed’s policy outlook can cause a sizable market response. Last week was one of those occasions.

Before getting into the details, it should be noted that although the Fed is effectively central bank for the world, its mandate is explicitly US-focused. It aims to achieve an average inflation rate of 2% over time (which means it will need to let inflation rise above 2% to make up for the time it spent below target) and maximum employment of Americans. While in recent years it has become more conscious of how its actions reverberate around the world, those reverberations are only fully considered to the extent that they impact the US.

Last week’s meeting took place against a particularly interesting background, and while there was no announced change in policy, change seems to be coming sooner than expected.

The US economy is recovering from the Covid-19 shock and growing strongly. The FOMC statement noted the progress on vaccinations and improvement in economic activity and employment, but also that the sectors most adversely affected by the pandemic are still struggling. It pointed out again that the rise in inflation is expected to be transitory. As a result, the statement concludes that its policy rate will remain close to zero and its monthly purchases of $120 billion in Treasuries and mortgage-backed securities will remain until maximum employment is judged to have been achieved and inflation is on track to moderately exceed 2% “for some time”.

Going dotty

However, the accompanying quarterly ‘dot plot’, which shows the projections of 18 individual Fed officials and the heads of regional reserve banks (not all of whom are voting members of FOMC), suggests that most officials now believe rates will rise sooner than the market expected. The median dot on the plot now suggests two rate hikes in 2023 though there is clearly still a wide range of views among officials. Three months ago, the dot plot still pointed to unchanged rates in 2023.

Source: US Federal Reserve

That is still a long time away, but markets will start – and have already started – pricing in that day. As a result, investments linked to a lower-for-longer interest rate view came under pressure: stocks sold off and the rand ended the week well above R14 per dollar.

The inflation outlook is crucial here.

Inflation has been rising faster than expected as the reopening of the economy has resulted in various shortages and bottlenecks.

In simple terms, demand has recovered sooner than supply can respond. For instance, hotels that stood empty for months suddenly find themselves dealing with an influx of customers, and prices have increased to reflect this. Similarly, cars are in short supply and used car prices jumped by 7% in the month of May alone.

As the Fed suggests, these increases are likely to be temporary as supply rises to meet demand. The main thing is that inflation expectations remain anchored, to use the jargon.

In other words, if most people believe the inflation spike is temporary, their behaviour won’t fundamentally change. However, if they start expecting inflation to remain at these levels, or even accelerate, people will start responding accordingly. They will bring forward big-ticket purchases, increasing demand. Workers will demand higher wage increases. Landlords will jack up rental escalations. Longer-term contracts will incorporate higher annual increases.

This is how inflation becomes self-fulfilling.

If this happens, higher interest rates could be needed to short-circuit the vicious cycle, as was the case in the late 1970s.

For the time being, the Fed’s dots suggest inflation can be expected to average 3.4% this year, up from 2.4% in March, but that it will settle closer to 2% over the next few years.

Meanwhile, the US economy is expected to have a bumper year. The dots show an upgraded growth forecast of 7% this year, declining to 3.3% next year and 2.4% in 2023. These are all above the longer-term potential rate of 1.8%.

Timing the taper

Long before the Fed hikes rates, it will scale down or taper its monthly bond-buying (quantitative easing) programme, eventually halting it altogether. Fed chair Jerome Powell indicated that the committee is now discussing this, but would not commit to timing. An announcement will probably be made before the end of this year.

On one level, a normalisation in monetary policy is very good news. That is if the US and global economies no longer need emergency support that should be supportive for a broad range of investments. However, as we’ve seen during the course of the year, it is not necessarily a smooth adjustment. There are investments – bonds and some specific types of equities – whose high valuations depend on continued low interest rates and who are vulnerable.

It would, however, be simplistic to say that equity markets have only gone up because of low interest rates, when earnings growth has been phenomenal after bottoming out mid-2020. It is similarly simplistic to say that bond yields are low because of the Fed’s purchases. After all, the 10-year government bond yield has tripled since August (from 0.5% to 1.5%) despite the Fed’s ongoing large-scale bond purchases. There is always nuance.

Similarly, though emerging markets are potentially at risk of destabilising capital outflows, if US monetary policy is tightened because of stronger growth, they can benefit from the export side. It depends.

Have we seen this movie before?

The 2013 to 2018 period can give us clues, but today’s scenario is not exactly the same.

After slashing interest rates to near-zero levels in 2008, and then embarking on several rounds of quantitative easing, by 2013 the Fed was starting to consider scaling back stimulus. Then Fed chair Ben Bernanke infamously set off the so-called taper tantrum in May 2013 when he suggested a tapering of bond purchases could be on the horizon. US – and global – bonds sold off and yields rose. Emerging market currencies started falling. Though violent, the taper tantrum was fairly short-lived.

However, for emerging markets, the cat was out of the bag. The billions of dollars that flowed in during the ‘search for yield’ era between 2009 and 2013 would now be at risk as investors eyed not just the end of quantitative easing, but also the eventual hiking of the federal funds rate. In 2014, a grouping of emerging markets that included South Africa earned the nickname Fragile Five as they were particularly vulnerable to capital flight. One consequence was that the SA Reserve Bank started raising interest rates even though domestic growth was starting to slow. The US dollar also appreciated markedly on a trade-weighted basis in the second half of 2014 and again in 2016.

In the end, the Fed’s policy tightening was extremely slow. The Fed hiked rates for the first time only in December 2015, and only by 25 basis points. The next hike only came a year later, and it then proceeded very gradually. But by late 2018, the market started worrying that even the slow and steady increase in rates was overdoing it. Equities and bonds sold off sharply, and credit markets showed signs of cracking. The Fed stopped the hikes and soon started cutting. At no point was there a serious risk of inflation, despite low interest rates, declining unemployment and billions of dollars of liquidity injected into the financial system. This pre-pandemic experience will in all likelihood inform the Fed’s path in the months and years ahead.

Central bank policy interest rates, %

Source: Refinitiv Datastream

Dollar drift?

As US interest rates will in all likelihood rise faster than those of Europe and Japan, this could lift the US dollar at the expense of other currencies. However, the extent of any possible dollar appreciation is likely to be countered by the fact that the US twin deficit – the combined current account and fiscal deficit – is at a record level in double digits. These deficits don’t matter nearly as much to the US as they would for other countries since the US has the world’s reserve currency. But they are not irrelevant

Twin deficits: current account plus budget balance as % of GDP

Source: Refinitiv Datastream

Portfolio implications

So what should investors at the southern tip of Africa do about these decisions being taken thousands of miles away in Washington DC?

The first point is that as markets reprice expectations for US interest rates, things could get quite choppy. Don’t panic if there is volatility. Big bear markets happen when there is a recession (or one on the horizon) and that is clearly not the case now.

Secondly, as noted earlier, some investments can be hurt by rising rates, but others should respond favourably to the conditions that give rise to higher interest rates as long as we are talking about decent rates of real economic growth and not sustained high inflation.

This implies that equity remains the preferred asset class, but that returns are more likely to come from earnings growth than rising valuations.

Thirdly, there is no reason to expect US short-term interest rates to eventually settle at particularly high levels. In the last decade, the highest they could reach – briefly – was 2.5%. Rates in Europe and Japan will probably rise by even less, if they ever do. Longer-term interest rates should reflect this. In other words, global fixed income is unlikely to be a particularly attractive option.

Finally, in terms of South African investments, we note that valuation is still on the side of domestic bonds, equities and property. South Africa seems less vulnerable than during the previous period of tightening US monetary policy. Inflation is under control and expected to remain close to the SA Reserve Bank’s 4.5% target, with inflation expectations also anchored close to that level. South Africa’s combined twin deficit is smaller than in 2013/14 when we became a member of the Fragile Five. This is because our current account is in surplus, even though the fiscal deficit is much larger. Importantly, unlike the earlier period, South Africa’s political and policy mix is also moving in the right direction.

This in turn implies that we shouldn’t expect substantial increases in short-term interest rates, which renders money market an unattractive longer-term investment.

Finally, since the future could still unfold in many unexpected ways, appropriate portfolio diversification remains important.

Izak Odendaal and Dave Mohr are investment strategists at Old Mutual Wealth.

COMMENTS   5

Sort by:
  • Oldest first
  • Newest first
  • Top voted

You must be signed in to comment.

SIGN IN SIGN UP

The real(inflation-adjusted) interest rate differential between SA and the US is 10%. South Africa is one of the most expensive places on earth to do business or to access capital. The economic policies and their impact on interest rates create a barrier to entry for businesses and entrepreneurs in South Africa. This is the biggest tax on locals by far. This is the ANC incompetence and ignorance tax.

Even if US interest rates rise, they will remain lower than the rate of inflation. Negative real rates are supportive of economic growth in nominal terms because this policy creates dollar liquidity across the globe. Negative real rates in the US will support commodity producers and their suppliers and service providers in South Africa.

The international indexes will enter a serious correction/recession/crash when real interest rates in the US enter the positive territory. The dedicated investor only has to monitor the real price of money as described by the US 2-year / 30-year yield spread as a leading indicator and advance warning of a crash. Push the revolutions of that engine in the red until the oil warning light goes on.

What all of this implies is that, contrary to the general opinion, the record debt levels in the USA are very bullish for the markets.

It may appear that massive debt via monetisation makes higher rates to be a burden too far. The EU went negative on the issue and remains where it was. With the addition of the never ending “pandemic” “emergency” and its debt monetisation impact there are winners and losers. The winners are not interested in having any changes at this time because they see that the losers can only lose ad infinitum until none left. Meanwhile, inflation is transferrable for some, until it can no longer be absorbed. But if rate increases cannot be sustained at any level? Surely then (now) the historical debt levels that are beyond repayable must make for an almighty historical recession, with prospectively systemic (monetary and fiscal) destruction power to at least match that of its murderous population eliminating evil.

You are right, of course. The debt levels in developed nations, even in South Africa, are impossible to repay. These countries will inevitably default on their debt obligations. This is a fact. It is only the shape or form of the default that is in question.

There are various types of defaults but they all have the same implication, namely the destruction of purchasing power of savings. The crude and outright refusal to repay is the unsophisticated default. Mugabe showed the middle finger to Brittain and the IMF. He defaulted through the bankruptcy route that also destroyed the financial system, caused a run on the banks, and crashed the economy to this day.

There is another, more sophisticated alternative though. This alternative, you won’t believe, is IMF policy actually. The sophisticated default goes by the name of “financial repression” and it leaves the financial system and the banking system intact. It actually stimulates the economy in nominal terms and is beneficial to the banking system!

This mechanism has the effect of transferring pension savings in interest-bearing instruments like money-market funds and bond funds to pay down the government debt. It is not outright confiscation of savings like we fear in South Africa, but the stealthy transfer of purchasing power of those savings by manipulating the interest rates lower than the inflation rate. Within a few decades, inflation pushes the nominal GDP to catch up to the nominal levels of debt, creating a favorable and acceptable Debt/GDP ratio without any real growth and without any real repayment of debt. This is pure financial wizardry.

No man in a million recognizes this sophisticated default. People even keep on voting for the government that steals their money! Ignorance is bliss!

OM must be living on another planet. Rising inflation (=higher discount rates) + QE tapering will cause the biggest market crash in history, starting later this year. A recession is not required for this to happen! So, the FED will be caught on the wrong side of inflation, will have to raise rates sooner than 2023. So, we are in the last leg of the secular bull market. Stocks will shoot up during the next few months, the dollar will weaken and then we’ll enter the long awaited bear market, thanks to the Fed.

End of comments.

LATEST CURRENCIES  

USD / ZAR
GBP / ZAR
EUR / ZAR
BTC / USD

Podcasts

INSIDER SUBSCRIPTIONS APP VIDEOS RADIO / LISTEN LIVE SHOP OFFERS WEBINARS NEWSLETTERS TRENDING PORTFOLIO TOOL CPD HUB

Follow us:

Search Articles:
Click a Company: