You are currently viewing our desktop site, do you want to visit our Mobile web app instead?
Join our mailing list to receive top business news every weekday morning.

Foreigners are not dumping SA bonds

They have actually been net buyers this year.
Daily data from the JSE is useful, but it still has to be cleaned before a more accurate picture of the flows can emerge. Image: Dean Hutton/Bloomberg

Over the last few months a narrative has emerged that foreign investors are deserting South Africa’s bond market. Some commentators even held this up as evidence that the country is becoming uninvestable.

Read: Foreigners are dumping bonds as junk status looms

However, a recent note from RMB Global Markets Research points out that the data on which these analyses are based has some shortcomings. In fact, more reliable data shows that foreigners still have a healthy appetite for South African bonds, and have actually been net buyers of R55.4 billion worth this year.

The discrepancy

The investor perception about foreign selling of bonds has mostly come from Bloomberg’s daily reports of net purchases by foreigners, which is sourced from the JSE. This specifically looks at daily trades, but for a number of reasons this data does not provide a complete picture.

“Firstly, the daily data provided by the JSE is adjusted and revised before it is re-released as weekly, monthly and annual data,” explains Kim Silberman, fixed income and currency economist at RMB.

The chart below illustrates how the JSE’s aggregated daily trade data, which is what is reported most often, can differ quite significantly from its own monthly data. For instance, the monthly data shows significantly less foreign selling over June, July and August than suggested by the daily data.

Source: Bloomberg, National Treasury, RMB Global Markets (data as at October 2)

The first shortcoming in the JSE’s daily data is that it captures all the trades placed on the exchange, but not all of those trades are necessarily executed. It also does not account for certain derivative trades or parts of such trades. Secondly, JSE data is also reliant on financial institutions providing information about where market participants are domiciled.

More reliable

For these reasons, Silberman argues that the more accurate data is that which is provided by Strate to National Treasury, which is based on a completely different exercise.

“They are not looking at trades, but at the holdings data,” she explains. “They aren’t trying to aggregate and decipher daily trades to get to a net trading position at the end of a month. The data tells you the value of SA bonds held by foreigners at the end of each month and you can then compare that to the month before. That is a much more accurate reflection of flows.”

Differences also arise because the JSE would not capture redemptions (when a bond holding is paid out because it falls due).

“At that point the government has to pay the bond holder back,” says Silberman. “There would be a reduction in foreign holdings because you’ve had to pay back the bond, but that is not going to be captured in JSE statistics.”

Looking at the change in foreign holdings on this basis shows that international investors have actually been net buyers of South African bonds this year. The chart below contrasts this number with those provided by the JSE.

Source: Bloomberg, National Treasury, RMB Global Markets (data as at October 2)

“The data coming from National Treasury is a much more accurate reflection of changes in foreign bond ownership, and the picture it is giving is very different,” Silberman points out.

“While the JSE data is useful, as it is the only source provided daily and in time series format, it is important to understand that it’s not clean. It still has to be cleaned for you to get a better picture of the flows.”

Unfortunately many commentators have been using the JSE data as though it is already clean, and that, Silberman believes, is a mistake.

“It’s important because it impacts sentiment, and it’s important because the National Treasury data shows that we are exposed to the impact of a downgrade,” she says.

The Moody’s factor

Analysts have been pointing out that some foreign selling of South African bonds actually lowers the likely market impact of a credit downgrade by Moody’s, because a number of international investors would have ‘pre-sold’ on the expectation that this would happen. As Ian Scott, head of fixed income at Momentum Investments, points out, the more local bonds foreigners hold, the more might have to be sold in the event of a downgrade.

“In the face of a possible ratings downgrade, you don’t want to have a massive foreign overhang that will hit your bond market when everyone wants to get out,” he notes. “Not that I’m convinced that all the foreigners will leave if there is a downgrade, since our real yields are high, but there will be a knee-jerk reaction.”

Read: How bad is the foreign selling of SA assets?

The crucial consideration is that a downgrade by Moody’s would mean that South Africa falls out of the FTSE World Government Bond Index (WGBI). Funds tracking that index or who can only hold investment-grade bonds would then be forced sellers.

Silberman however points out that there are good reasons why these asset managers would find it difficult to sell out of their South African bond positions before that happens.

“Our view is that foreign bond holders will prefer to hedge their bets via the currency ahead of the MTBPS [medium-term budget policy statement] in October and Moody’s country review on November 1, since a downgrade is not the consensus expectation,” says Silberman.

“As South Africa’s bonds are the highest yielding in the WGBI, it becomes very expensive for those funds tracking the index to be short SA bonds.”

Get access to Moneyweb's financial intelligence and support quality journalism for only
R63/month or R630/year.
Sign up here, cancel at any time.



You must be signed in to comment.


Very interesting point. I think showing the value of the monthly repayments would be helpful too. I guess some of the new buyers are actually using the repayment to re-invest in new bonds.

Sept 5, 2018 South Africa has a $14 BILLION question with looming junk status.
August 14, 2019 “Investors have been dumping South African government bonds at a rate of almost R 2 BILLION a day in August.
I think I will listen to the international news on this front.

Yes, moneyweb is clearly the voice of the ANC. Or something. If you had actually read the article, you would understand the numbers.

Africans. Celebrating ignorance.


“Our view is that foreign bond holders will prefer to hedge their bets via the currency”

Most likely this is the case. Is it possible to find data on short positions on the rand to assess traders bets on a downgrade?

When a country typically falls out of the WGBI-index (as a result of downgrade to non-investment grade) it would also mean that funds that are indeed allowed to invest in non-investment-grade bonds, will pick up some of the bonds sold (when those mature) by funds subject to WGBI-rules.

What one does not readily know is, how big is the bond-market controlled by funds that are not supposed to own non-investment grade bonds, versus those funds that are allowed to own it(?)

….the immediate effect on the ZAR or bond rate could probably be more gradual than otherwise anticipated, as those non-investment grade bonds still need time to run to maturity, right?

Politicking of the economist’s…

People of this profession manipulate figures to sway members of the population towards a direction which plays in their favour. They’ll exclude or include factors to create an outcome which motivates an argument so that money moves in a way which favours them, ultimately creating wealth for themselves. It just goes to prove that you can’t trust anyone and you should make up your own mind based on your own understanding of the circumstances.

It’s obvious that this country’s facing financial difficulties, but that doesn’t mean it’s bad news for everyone…

As a result of KYC and FICA, owners of financial assets are known.
So, on what basis should there be any doubt/question (or need to creative a narrative) as to whether foreigners are buying or selling South African bonds?

Quality, balanced journalism, as usual from Patrick

Thanks for putting the record straight on this on, Patrick.

End of comments.





Follow us:

Search Articles:Advanced Search
Click a Company: