Pick of the education stocks

Key metrics compared.
One of ADvTECH’s Trinityhouse campuses. Image: Supplied

Over the last month and a half, the three JSE-listed education stocks have reported their 2021 results (all have December year-ends, so the results are comparable).

On February 23, private schooling group Curro (COH) reported revenue growth of 15% from 9% learner growth (and fee increases), good cash generation and a strong recovery in earnings after the prior period’s impairments.

On March 14, tertiary collection Stadio (SDO) reported 9% student growth, revenue rising 18% and earnings up somewhat more.

Finally, last week, diversified educational group AdvTech (ADH) reported 6% learner growth driving revenue growth of 8% (there were no fees increases in its schools segment) and earnings lifting 35%.


How do these stocks compare?

Zooming into key metrics – financial, operational and market valuation – we can see more clearly:

School pupils (% y/y) Varsity learners (% y/y) Revenue (% y/y) FY21 earnings* (% y/y) Net debt:equity (%)** Interest cover (x)*** EV/Ebitda (x)
AdvTech 9% 4% 8% 35% 52% 6.9x 8.3x
Curro 9% 15% 37% 44% 3.0x 12.4x
Stadio 9% 18% 24% 5% 17.5x 11.5x

* Using each company’s own ‘normalised’ version of earnings per share; ** Including IFRS 16 leases; *** Operating profit/net finance charges.

A few observations from the above comparison of these stocks:

  • While AdvTech’s revenue is growing the slowest, management has driven efficiencies that translate into excellent earnings growth:
    • One of the reasons for the slower revenue growth was that AdvTech froze its schools segment’s fees. This likely improved these schools’ attractiveness to cash-strapped consumers and the good schooling enrolment growth (the same as Curro’s supposed growth story!) is arguably a result of this.
    • The efficiency drive within AdvTech is also starting to bear tangible benefits. In its recent results presentation, management was slow to quantify expected future benefits of this efficiency drive but expects a lot more to come through.
  • While Curro is keeping its revenue run-rate in double digits, its interest cover is half that of AdvTech and a fraction of Stadio’s:
    • This is despite Curro’s recent R1.5 billion rights issue that paid down (temporary) debt with (permanent) equity. Always a tough trade-off and, typically, only made when management teams have no options left.
    • The fee increases at Curro schools was also probably needed to help handle this irksome capital structure, though each round of fee increases here erodes Curro’s core value educational offering relative to competitors that do not increase their fees. This may have a negative impact on future enrolment periods …
  • Stadio stands out as the lowest geared group, and its varsity learnership numbers are growing quicker than AdvTech’s Tertiary segment. Interestingly, top-line growth was eaten up by equivalent (operating) cost expansion and earnings growth was more muted than both Curro and AdvTech:
    • Stadio’s cost expansion is likely due to the build-out of the group’s capacity, structure and new campus to accommodate its aggressive 100 000 student target.
    • Hence, although the balance sheet and income statement are lowly geared, one does wonder what the capital structure of this group will look like after the building is done. When Stadio builds it, will the students actually come? A lot of capital is betting the answer to that question being ‘Yes’.
  • Given the large differences in capital structure, capacity growth and even strategy, it is worth noting that the EV/Ebitda (enterprise value/earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortisation) – think of this metric as a ‘debt-neutral price-earnings ratio’ – of AdvTech is materially lower than the other two counters.

All things considered, I would argue that Curro is currently the poorest of the JSE-listed investment options (fee-driven growth, high gearing, straining balance sheet and the most expensive share), while AdvTech and Stadio both appear better quality. Stadio, though, has a higher valuation than AdvTech, a more concentrated portfolio and a less tested growth profile.

Thus, via process of elimination, I would have to say that the pick of the domestic education sector has to be AdvTech, with a balanced schooling and tertiary portfolio and top-, bottom- and volume-based growth trajectory.

Keith McLachlan – investment officer of Integral Asset Management.


You must be signed in and an Insider Gold subscriber to comment.




Subscribe to our mailing list

* indicates required
Moneyweb newsletters

Instrument Details  

You do not have any portfolios, please create one here.
You do not have an alert portfolio, please create one here.

Follow us:

Search Articles:
Click a Company: