You are currently viewing our desktop site, do you want to download our app instead?
Moneyweb Android App Moneyweb iOS App Moneyweb Mobile Web App
Join our mailing list to receive top business news every weekday morning.

The long list of shorts

The JSE appears full of opportunities for hedge fund managers.
Companies with overcomplicated structures are among the type identified for shorting by hedge fund managers. Image: Shutterstock

One of the defining characteristics of the poor recent performance on the JSE is how broad it has been. According to analysis by Northstar Asset Management, 52% of stocks in the FTSE/JSE All Share Index have delivered negative returns over the last three years.

This has created an incredibly difficult environment for most local asset managers, since the opportunity to find stocks delivering positive returns has been extremely limited. The consequences for getting it wrong in many cases have also been severe.

The chart below shows a number of well-known counters that have lost significant value over the past 18 months. This shows the period from January 1, 2018 to June 28, 2019, but some of them were in decline even before that.

Source: Bloomberg, 36One Asset Management

Sixteen counters have fallen more than 35% over this period. That includes some substantial names like Aspen, Steinhoff, Massmart and Intu.

Many local funds have been hurt by these large declines. Steinhoff was held by more than 300 unit trusts and exchange-traded funds (ETFs) in the months before its share price collapsed.

A different perspective

However, this has also created a fertile set of opportunities for another set of managers – those running hedge funds with the opportunity to short stocks and therefore benefit when their prices go down. In fact, some hedge funds have enjoyed particularly strong performance over the past 18 months as they have been able to take advantage of this volatility.

This requires viewing the market from a different perspective.

“Where we think you have to look at things differently in South Africa is that most traditional managers make investment decisions based on financial forecasts,” says Cy Jacobs, CEO of 36One Asset Management. “They corroborate those with information from the past and draw a line from there to what they will deliver in the future.”

However, the South African economic environment has changed so fundamentally that those forecasts are increasingly difficult to make with confidence.

“You need to take a proper hard look at the economy we are in now, in the industry you are planning on investing in and ask if that industry can survive in these times,” says Jacobs. “Can it actually grow, does it have a sustainable business model?”

You also have to question the quality of the company’s leadership.

“You have to look at the board and management and ask what are these executives really about,” Jacobs notes. “Do they have proper independence, and are they incentivised as you are as a shareholder?”

Where to look

He says there are specifically four areas in which they are identifying companies that he calls “questionable” and therefore potential shorts. The first relates to corporate governance.

“We’ve seen a lot of this of late in South Africa,” says Jacobs. “We’ve had to deal with management teams that have a lack of integrity, that don’t tell you the truth, where their message is not consistent every six months when you meet with them. Those are quite easy to see.”

More difficult to spot are companies in the second bucket – those reporting good looking earnings, but with no cash flows.

“There are large amount of these companies, including the likes of Aspen, which was a great company in the early days when it was really growing earnings,” Jacobs says. “But everybody ignored the cash flows. They saw the gearing climbing but thought that they would just grow their way out of it. But when the growth stops, the truth is that the cash flow can go massively negative.”

A number of property companies have also shown this tendency.

“If you look at their operational cash earnings, which is the rental they earn less expenses, this is what you would expect them to pay out as a dividend,” Jacobs explains. “The truth is that some property companies are doing this and more. In some cases there have been some fake schemes; in others it’s been one-off profits; or they were leveraging themselves and paying a dividend; or they were raising equity and giving it back to you as a dividend. But when you actually looked at the cash flow of the underlying business you realised that the dividend was never going to be sustained at those levels.”

Hide and seek

A third type of company that hedge fund managers have identified for shorting are those with overcomplicated structures.

“Nobody needs multiple trust accounts in Switzerland, holding companies across the globe, or multiple management companies in spider diagrams like Steinhoff had,” says Jacobs.

“If you tried to follow the audit trail of where the money went it was absolutely impossible. Whenever you see that, we say be wary.”

Finally, companies that are reliant on a single or very large customer are extremely vulnerable.

“Obviously having government as your main client comes to mind,” says Jacobs. “The ENSAfrica report on EOH was an exact prime example of that.”

Read/Listen: EOH fraud disclosure includes payment of bribes to secure state tenders

“This whole subset of opportunities does create an extra subset of profit for our hedge funds,” Jacobs says. “In volatile times, why just concentrate on a subset of opportunities in the hope that they are going to go up? You need to be able to make money on both sides of the equation.”

Get access to Moneyweb's financial intelligence and support quality journalism for only
R63/month or R630/year.
Sign up here, cancel at any time.



Sort by:
  • Oldest first
  • Newest first
  • Top voted

You must be signed in to comment.


The best short of them all is the RAND.

45 years of solid returns > 6% p.a. no analysis, hedge fund fees etc required. Outperforms almost all asset classes when SA experiences recessions.

In 1968 when I was very young (Grade 1) my father went overseas to the USA. I remember him showing us his US dollars forex. He got $1.30 for each rand. Gold cost $35 per ounce or about R27 per ounce. My pocket money was 5c per week.

Today the gold price is R22000 or $1490 per ounce. In 51 or so years the price of gold has gone up 800 times in rand terms and 42.5 times in dollar terms. Hoarding US$ is also a sure way of losing money but but at a slower rate than hoarding Rands.

To decimate the rand like this we need a compounded inflation of about 14% for 51 years. The Rand has lost value. Most people think that the Rand loses value like an old threadbare carpet has lost its value but they are wrong. The value has been transferred to other entities. It’s like you had 10kg of sugar in the cupboard. Someone is siphoning off your sugar and now you have 8.8kg.

These days I don’t get pocket money.

Agreed, In hindsight I should’ve invested everything in Kruger rands.

Compound return of 22% p.a and thousands of rands saved compared to asset management fees & brokerage for equities.

For the next 50 years in SA, it’s probably still be best bet.

What a lovely contribution Richard, as always! The way I see it, the rate at which gold appreciates will increase, as fiat currencies depreciate at an increasing rate. Gold wins with deflation and inflation, now that interest rates are near zero and even negative. Negative interest rates force savings out of bonds and bank deposits, into gold. Inflation forces savers into gold anyway. The masters of the fiat currency regime have reached the end game. Every step they take moves them closer to the next gold standard.

Gone AWOL, you now have another opportunity to buy gold. No hindsight, only foresight.

This is an excellent, sensible analysis of the research required before investing, not only before going short.
The available investment information available to investors has improved immensely in recent times.

The list of companies I consider as investable is getting shorter but the shortable list is getting longer. Some of the companies I look at change disclosure, segmentation, focus, strategy, targets, accounting or even management teams almost every 6 months. These are signs of board incompetence (board is tasked with ensuring accountability and long term shareholder value creation), not only poor management. Then you have independent board members who sit on 4+ boards earning up to R7m per position.

End of comments.





Follow us:

Search Articles:Advanced Search
Click a Company: