You are currently viewing our desktop site, do you want to visit our Mobile web app instead?
 Registered users can save articles to their personal articles list. Login here or sign up here

The only unit trust to hold AEEI and Ayo

And AEEI is its largest holding.

Over the past few months, there has been a great deal of controversy around JSE-listed African Equity Empowerment Investments (AEEI) and Ayo Technology Solutions. The two firms have been unable to escape negative headlines.

The testimony from current and former senior Ayo staff at the Mpati Commission of Inquiry into the Public Investment Corporation (PIC) has been particularly unsettling. It has suggested a pattern of misleading the market.

Read: Ayo valuation was stretched to meet Survé‘s demands

Ayo chief investment officer (CIO) Malick Salie told the commission that Ayo’s listing valuation had been ‘stretched’. While he initially valued the company at R2.3 billion, Ayo listed on a final valuation of R14.7 billion, or R47 per share. Since its listing in December 2017, the stock has fallen 77% to trade at around R11 per share.

Read: Ayo ex-CIO says company is partly illegitimate

The company’s former CIO, Siphiwe Nodwele told the commission that Ayo’s financial statements had been manufactured. This aligned with testimony from former CEO Kevin Hardy who testified that Ayo’s interim results to February 2018 had been altered. The JSE has since instructed the company to get an audited opinion on those numbers as well as its interims to the end of February 2019.

Read: PIC enquiry: Fears of repercussions for Ayo witnesses

Ayo is a subsidiary of AEEI, which is the listed public trading company of Sekunjalo Investment Holdings. The JSE’s general manager for issuer regulation, Andries Visser, told the commission that the stock exchange is looking at a number of related party transactions involving companies connected to Sekunjalo. In particular, he mentioned the transfer of money between Ayo and investment management firm 3 Laws Capital, which is controlled by Sekunjalo.

Read: JSE explains Ayo and scuppered Sagarmatha listing

Under the weight of these controversies, AEEI’s share price has fallen from a high of R7.70 in January 2018 to current levels around R2. That is a drop of 74% in 18 months.

The outlier

Given this backdrop, it’s not surprising that most asset managers have steered away from including either AEEI or Ayo in their portfolios. In fact, there is only one unit trust in the country that holds either. And it is invested in both.

The IP Flexible Fund, which is managed by boutique firm Integrated Managed Investments (IMI), has been invested in AEEI since it launched in February 2017. It is the fund’s largest holding. The fund’s portfolio also includes Ayo.

According to figures from Morningstar, the IP Flexible Fund is the worst performer in the South Africa multi-asset flexible category – over the last year and for the year to date. It is down 27.6% in the past 12 months, and 11% since the start of 2019.

IMI portfolio manager John Lamont explains that the unit trust was initially funded by a private family. Those clients have held AEEI since 2012, based on what he believes is a strong investment case.

“The value reflected in AEEI’s underlying NAV [net asset value] was not reflected in the share price,” Lamont says of their decision to invest in 2012. “This was expected to unlock through the separate listing of both the IT and fishing operations, continued growth in the various underlying operations through strategic acquisitions and organic growth, and the through payment of dividends back to shareholders. There was also blue sky optionality within their biotech division, which is focused on immune gene therapy.”

Looking up

Despite what has transpired over the past 18 months, Lamont argues that this investment case has in fact improved, not deteriorated. He believes AEEI is achieving milestones set in its ‘Vision 2020’ strategy, and that it is trading at an attractive discount to its peer group of up to 50%.

He believes it has a strong portfolio of investments, including in multinationals British Telecoms South Africa and Saab Grintek Defence, as well as AEEI Premier Fishing. The company also started paying dividends in 2015, and these have grown at 30-40% per year.

“We still see significant upside,” he says.

With respect to Ayo, Lamont argues that it has concluded a number of transactions, with projected revenues of over R3 billion and profits of R200 million. These figures were cited by Salie in his testimony to the Mpati Commission.

This part of Salie’s testimony was not widely reported. Despite the concerns he raised, the company’s CIO expressed the belief that if Ayo can get past its corporate governance and reputational issues, it has good underlying businesses:

“If you look at those real existing cash generative businesses, they are hampered by the current Ayo reputation, but obviously, as things get remedied, the hope is that they will continue to trade and operate the way they have always done and grow from there,” Salie said.

The difficulty for investors, however, is whether they can really believe the numbers. At the moment, there is more than enough uncertainty to keep most asset managers away. Lamont, however, is not deterred.

“We view it as unfortunate that few persons have taken time to interrogate or engage AEEI and Ayo on their various strategies,” he says. “In terms of the disclosures made to the PIC commission, we are presently engaging with the boards of AEEI and Ayo in order to ascertain the corrective measures being followed.”

Get access to Moneyweb's financial intelligence and support quality journalism for only
R63/month or R630/year.
Sign up here, cancel at any time.

AUTHOR PROFILE

COMMENTS   13

To comment, you must be registered and logged in.

LOGIN HERE

Don't have an account?
Sign up for FREE

Every village needs clown, and in the village of unit trusts, the clown is…..

Unit trusts are not meant to be private vehicles. That goes against the spirit of what they are intended for. Two investors!! Where is the FSCA investigation?

If you wealthy enough, why not setup your own Unit Trust? you avoid CGT, can get institutional pricing. What does the “spirit” or intention have to do with it?

It’s called proper planning.

Good morning, there is a mistake in this article which needs to be corrected. The fund is not a private fund. The fund is open to the public as required, and does not have only two investors.

John Lamont’s written response to me was that: “It is a private unit trust, managed on behalf of a (sic) 2 clients.”

A beautiful written admission. Not that anybody tasked with enforcement is paying any attention, but still.

What is missing from the JSE-listed African Equity Empowerment Investments (AEEI) and Ayo Technology Solutions story is the actual truth about how the valuations got 3 to 4 times overvalued through mysterious ‘NAV’s’ being manufacturerd and overpriced.

Iqbal Survey will NEVER tell the truth following this corrupt and illegal enrichment at the expense of PIC pensioners.

Seems a company called Oakbay Investments Pty Ltd holds 2,498,666 of AEEI shares…Oakbay Investmnents has the same address as the other Oakbay

He sees “significant upside”. No my boy, that’s an elephant in your eye.

It will be interesting to know who the key shareholder that set up this unit,and the faith he has, i sure he must be a connected person,

Where is the unit trust regulator,i this unit trust,and how big is this holding in two connected listing,surely there must be a maximum of 10% in a company,otherwise why create a unit,,

Load All 13 Comments
End of comments.

LATEST CURRENCIES  

USD / ZAR
GBP / ZAR
EUR / ZAR

Podcasts

SHOP NEWSLETTERS TRENDING CPD HUB

Follow us:

Search Articles:Advanced Search
Click a Company: