Registered users can save articles to their personal articles list. Login here or sign up here

Custody battle for Gupta’s orphan mines nears end

The family continues to orchestrate events from afar, beyond the reach of SA justice.

Two jewels in the Gupta tiara – Optimum Coal Mine and Shiva Uranium – were the subject of legal action again this week, the latest in an unbelievable saga of intrigue and lawfare that commenced in February when business rescue practitioners (BRPs) took control of the companies.

There have been close to 50 legal cases – more than one a week – involving the eight Gupta companies under business rescue. Most involved attempts to liquidate the companies, strip the assets and pocket 10% of the proceeds, likely to exceed R200 million had they succeeded. Other cases involved attempts to remove the BRPs and replace them with more agreeable agents that would no doubt expedite the asset stripping that would ensue. Every one of the cases was defeated.

The unbridled greed and opportunism on display in these cases is extraordinary, even by the gluttonous standards of SA’s liquidation sector.

The first case heard last week involved an attempt by Swiss-based Charles King SA to block the sale of Tegeta, the Gupta holding company, to anyone but itself. The case was dismissed by the Pretoria High Court in October, and referred last week to arbitration, where Charles King again came up short.

As Moneyweb previously reported, Charles King, which BRPs believe is being directed by the Guptas from abroad, claimed a sale-of-shares agreement signed in 2017 gave it the right to purchase Tegeta for R2.9 billion, which is well short of what Tegeta’s assets – including Optimum and Shiva – are reckoned to be worth. 

Read: Ghosts of the Guptas still haunt Optimum coal mine

One of the conditions of the agreement was that Charles King put down a deposit of R66.7 million. The deposit was paid on October 22, 2017, but was R2.3 million short. The Guptas immediately used the R66.7 million deposit to pay salaries and other running expenses rather than place these funds into a trust account pending settlement of the full purchase price and transfer of the shares, as is normal in such transactions.

The arbitrator decided Charles King’s claims to Tegeta failed at the first hurdle, being the short-payment on the deposit, which resulted in the cancellation of the sale-of-shares agreement by the BRPs.

Sale agreement cancelled

The BRPs cancelled the Charles King sale agreement when they took control of Tegeta and seven other Gupta companies placed in business rescue in February on the grounds that several conditions in the agreement had not been fulfilled, among them the short payment on the deposit, non-compliance with BEE requirements and lack of sign-off by the Competition Commission.

“This now clears the way for the sale of Optimum Coal, which we would hope will be wrapped up before the end of the year,” says business rescue practitioner Louis Klopper.

Former Optimum owner Glencore, energy and commodities group Vitol and Phakamisa (involving Bernard Swanepoel and Patrice Motsepe) are among the groups reportedly interested in buying Optimum. Earlier this year Exxaro and Seriti also expressed interest in purchasing certain assets. Interested parties were required to show proof of funds or present bank guarantees for R250 million in order to conduct due diligence. It would be ironic if Glencore again ends up owning Optimum, given the controversial circumstances preceding its sale to the Guptas.

Signs for Optimum Pullenshope opencast and underground mining sites stand at the entrance to the Optimum Colliery, formerly owned by Glencore. Picture: Waldo Swiegers/Bloomberg

Eskom slapped Optimum with a R2.1 billion fine for supposedly supplying sub-standard coal, but a new forensic report released last month found that Eskom management had acted in bad faith by refusing to waive penalties against Glencore (the then owner of Optimum), thereby depressing the value of the mine. Eskom promptly reduced the fine when Tegeta, the Gupta holding company, bought the assets. The Guptas managed to purchase the mine for R2.15 billion using facilities and coal pre-payments from Eskom. They then proceeded to strip the mine of cash until their companies were placed in business rescue earlier this year.

Second case

A second case before the Companies Tribunal this week involved an attempt to remove Shiva’s BRPs and replace them with practitioners reportedly aligned with Gupta lieutenant George van der Merwe. Van der Merwe, who was dismissed as CEO of Optimum earlier this year on the grounds that he lacked the credentials for the job, was behind several previous attempts to remove the BRPs Louis Klopper and Kurt Knoop and replace them with Gupta-friendly practitioners. This too has raised suspicions that the Guptas are orchestrating events from afar.

The Tribunal ruled against Van der Merwe’s attempts to have Mohamed Tayob and Eugene Januarie appointed as BRPs at Shiva Uranium on the grounds that their appointment was irregular. The resolution appointing Tayob and Januarie was signed by Van der Merwe in September this year, two months after he was dismissed as CEO of Optimum. One possible reason for the attempt to remove Shiva Uranium’s BRPs is their objection to a R2.5 billion claim against Tegeta, described by the BRPs as “bogus”.

Attorney for the business rescue practitioners, Bouwer van Niekerk of law firm Smit Sewgoolam, says the resolution of these two latest cases helps pave the way for the sale of Optimum and Shiva and bringing them out of business rescue. “Hopefully, we have reached the end of the court cases and can now focus on finding buyers for the assets and securing the jobs of the people who work at these mines.”

AUTHOR PROFILE

COMMENTS   8

To comment, you must be registered and logged in.

LOGIN HERE

Don't have an account?
Sign up for FREE

Seeing that the Guptas will probably never be prosecuted in their lifetimes here in SA, nor will they ever pay back the looted funds, I wonder if they will capture another state sometime in the future. It should work in other African or South American countries as well. Why buy a company when you can buy a whole country.

According to rumours, another Indian family has, or is in the process of, capturing Zim…..so the Guptas are too late there!?

Yep. although an extradition treaty has been signed with the UAE, it’s very likely that the Guptas will bribe the lawmakers there with some of the money they stole from the poor of South Africa. Vile.

Not quite. They don’t have to bribe anyone in the UAE. The UAE will never release that money and return it to ZA, no matter what treaty is in place. They have utterly no regard for law outside of that which they make up for themselves.

The Guptas are already given security and protection, compliments of the UAE. They will never extradite the Guptas to ZA, they reward people like that for bringing money (illicit or not) into the UAE.

I have dealt with these people, they make up their own laws as they want to. All too often they say “It is now decreed that…” to get out of any previous agreement. In their land, there’s nothing you can do. Stay away from them, don’t trust them, don’t ever enter into an agreement with them.

The last decade will be remembered as “The Golden Era” by the legal profession, fondly toasted with vintage wines in leather armchairs.

Shiva Uranium is no jewel. It was sold the Gupta’s by Uranium One because it never ran according to its nameplate design and they washed to wash their hands of it. And it was a good move because the uranium price has been rubbish for years now.

The value for the Gupta’s would have been if SA went ahead with its nuclear build plan and they had a foot in the door with a dodgy mine.

Somebody should write an article about the fraud and theft that goes on in the distressed business industry. Liquidations and Business Rescue appear to compete with RAF and Personal Injury suits for the bottom of the bottom of the very most bottom pond slime (consistency of rodent infested congealed hair gell mixed with cat hair balls) in the legal ‘profession’ .

With respect, of course, my lord

Can’t change the past or history , but as coal is an essential natural asset ( think land and argument made to change constitution) then the solution to Eskom supply chain and security of tenure on the coal we need for power supplies = ability to attract investors = create work , is for the government to take all land under which there is coal for no cost…. just to simple… as soon as the constitutional change Reg 25 is enacted

Load All 8 Comments
End of comments.

LATEST CURRENCIES  

USD / ZAR
GBP / ZAR
EUR / ZAR

Podcasts

GO TO SHOP CART

Follow us:

Search Articles:Advanced Search
Click a Company:
server: 172.17.0.2