You are currently viewing our desktop site, do you want to download our app instead?
Moneyweb Android App Moneyweb iOS App Moneyweb Mobile Web App

NEW SENS search and JSE share prices

More about the app

Why southern Africa’s interior is an ideal place to generate solar energy

It’s not only about sunshine.
Image: Shutterstock

Southern Africa is popularly associated with sunshine. Does that make the region exceptionally suited to solar energy generation?

With electricity shortages plaguing all parts of the sub-continent, a plentiful energy source that is becoming increasingly affordable to tap into seems like an ideal solution. Yet the rollout of solar power generating facilities has been very slow in the region.

Most solar power developments in the sub-continent have been in South Africa. But even in the country, solar farms account for only 2.5% of the total electricity generated. Compare that to some European countries that don’t have ample sunshine, such as Germany, where solar’s share of the total electricity generated rose above 10% last year.

So is southern Africa, and in particular its dry interior, really among the world’s best sites for solar energy generation, as is often claimed?

Harvesting solar energy

Sunlight is ultimately a stream of photons. Think of photons as little arrows, each carrying a small quantum of energy. Upon striking a solar panel or some other solar device, the photon will be annihilated, and a fraction of its energy will be converted to heat or electricity.

To maximise the energy collected by the solar device, you try to intercept as many photons as you can. To achieve that you position the panel so that it blocks the path of as many photons as possible. That happens when the panel directly faces the sun.

A panel lying flat on the ground therefore maximises its photon catch when the sun is directly overhead. At noon the sun is closest to overhead in the tropics, so these latitudes also generally have the warmest climate.


There is a common misconception that the hottest areas are also most suited for solar power generation. But tropical regions often have a lot of cloud as well. Coastal areas also tend to be more cloud prone, and so some of the warmest cities in southern Africa, such as Durban (eThekwini) in South Africa or Maputo in Mozambique, are not top solar sites.

Around the northern and southern edges of the tropics we find regions with some of the driest climate, which normally implies less cloud cover. In southern Africa, these arid regions are the Namib, Kgalagadi and Karoo (semi)deserts and adjacent areas. These experience the sun nearly overhead around noon in the summer. Solar devices here can catch more energy in winter by tilting slightly towards the equator.

In southern Africa, solar panels usually perform best if they are tilted 20-30 degrees towards the north, meaning that they directly face the noon sun during the March and September equinoxes. Those angles also closely match the inclination angles of a typical domestic roof – so solar panels lying flat on a north-facing roof are often already at their optimal tilt.


Unlike many of the world’s arid regions, like the Sahara and parts of central Asia, the southern African dry areas experience comparatively low levels of dust. One result is good long-range visibility: light is able to move through the atmosphere freely.

Dust, smoke and haze in the atmosphere block part of the sunlight, like clouds do. While some of these conditions do occur for limited periods, the atmosphere over southern Africa generally has lower aerosol concentrations than in many other parts of the planet.

This is partly due to the large oceans on three sides of the region, which limits the importation of air contaminants from other continents.

High altitude

It is not only the contaminants in the air that block light, but to a small degree also clean air itself. About 20% of incoming photons from the sun’s vertical beam that could be processed by solar panels do not make it all the way to the ground. The percentage gets even larger as the sun nears the horizon, when photons are taking a longer path through the atmosphere.

This is another reason why latitudes closer to the poles become ever less suitable sites for solar energy generation. The sun there never gets close to a point vertically above. In southern Africa, however, with latitudes between about 15 and 35 degrees south, the sun is on average closer to the zenith. That makes higher solar energy yields possible.

Another advantage is that much of southern Africa is on a plateau between 1000-2000 metres above sea level. For example, at 1750 m above sea level, the city of Johannesburg has about 15% less atmosphere above it than a coastal location. It means that even under the clearest sky conditions sites on the plateau receive slightly more solar photons than coastal sites do.

Southern Africa – a solar hot spot?

All these factors create excellent conditions for the generation of solar energy in much of Southern Africa. Even the coastal, cloud prone locations have enough sunshine to match most of the solar power generating sites in the northern hemisphere industrialised countries. And the western interior, with its extremely low cloud cover, high altitude and low aerosol concentrations, offers some of the best conditions in the world for solar energy.

Southern African countries have been slow in embracing solar energy. Ten years ago the cost was still prohibitive, but not anymore. Many new initiatives are springing up in practically all parts of the region. It is a trend that is set to continue and get even stronger.The Conversation

Hartmut Winkler, Professor of Physics, University of Johannesburg

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.


Sort by:
  • Oldest first
  • Newest first
  • Top voted

You must be signed in to comment.


Although SA is a good place for solar, the obvious problem is that the sun has a nasty habit of setting, just as people get home from work and turn on their stoves and kettles.

As Andrew Kenny puts it in an article on the IRR’s website, this currently makes solar uncompetitive. I quote:

“To match this with wind, solar and batteries, you would require at least 227 of the world’s biggest batteries with a storage capacity of 129 MW each (like the one supplied to South Australia in 2018 by Elon Musk), costing in total about R180 billion.

They would have to be replaced at least once over the 20 years, bringing the battery costs alone to R360 billion.”

So although solar is very PC at present, it’s not the solution it’s often made out to be.

That is a rather simplistic view actually.

Battery technology is getting better with research and newer materials coming online eg. graphene etc. You are taking today’s price and merely x2! You don’t factor in better and cheaper alternatives and batteries are starting to adopt Moore’s law.

Simply put, you are comparing a computer of today with one in 20 years time. Do you honestly think you will get the same computer in 20 years with no advances or increase in computing power?j Mmmmm….

Make the panels into roof tiles

Many, many options exist; the ANC regime just cannot see how to make personal loot out of them, unlike Esko and hence little action on independent renewables (or any other power generation).

Well here on my farm in the Tankwa Karoo , i invite any solar or wind company to bring green electricity to the grid , just leave all the politics at home.

End of comments.





Follow us:

Search Articles: Advanced Search
Click a Company: