You are currently viewing our desktop site, do you want to download our app instead?
Moneyweb Android App Moneyweb iOS App Moneyweb Mobile Web App

NEW SENS search and JSE share prices

More about the app

An inside look at how MTI managed to prolong an extraordinary losing streak

It was losing money from the get-go, and had to lie and fabricate trading results to convince investors to climb on board.
The liquidators paint a picture of a scamster who had no clue how to close out a Ponzi scheme that had grown beyond his wildest dreams. Image: AdobeStock

Court papers filed by the liquidators for failed crypto scam Mirror Trading International (MTI) lift the curtain on one of the most extraordinary investment rip-offs in SA’s history.

It was rated the world’s biggest crypto scam of 2020, having roped in $588 million (R7.9 billion) worth of bitcoin in 470 000 transactions, according to the 2021 Crypto Crime Report by Chainalysis.

A data dump by Anonymous ZA puts the number of bitcoin under MTI control at 23 000, worth about R11.5 billion at current prices.

According to the liquidators, about 280 000 investors worldwide were involved.

MTI CEO Johann Steynberg disappeared in December 2020 after the company stopped paying out requests for withdrawals in a bitcoin investment scheme that promised returns of up to 10% a month. These promises turned out to be nothing but smoke. The company was provisionally liquidated in December 2020.

Read:

Legal argument will be heard next week in the Western Cape High Court as to whether MTI will be finally liquidated or whether, based on an affidavit filed by 50% shareholder in MTI Clynton Marks, the provisional liquidation order should be set aside on various grounds, including that the terms and conditions of the company make it clear that those investing in the scheme were members of a club, rather than creditors.

Rather than subject MTI to liquidation, there are some within MTI who argue that it should be either placed in business rescue or allowed to reach a compromise with creditors under the Companies Act.

The provisional liquidators argue that it is impossible to rescue a scheme that is unlawful, and they are asking the court to declare MTI a Ponzi scheme, and to have it placed in final liquidation.

The court papers provide fascinating and detailed insight into the inner workings of the company.

The rise and fall of MTI

A report by the Financial Sector Conduct Authority (FSCA), included as part of the liquidators’ door-stopper of a court filing, says there were three periods to MTI’s business:

  1. The first period was a disaster, but it might have been a small disaster had it stopped there. A total of nearly 51 bitcoin were deposited with Belize-based forex broker FXChoice, but 22 or 43% of these were lost by the traders. There was no multi-level marketing involved during this stage. This was to come in the second stage.
  2. The second period was from August 2019 to October 2020 when Steynberg purportedly introduced a computerised trading bot which MTI falsely claimed to have generated exceptional returns averaging more than 10% a month, with only one losing day out of about 200. FXChoice reported to the FSCA that 1 846 bitcoin were deposited with it between January and June 2020, but of this 566 bitcoin (about 30%) were lost. These trading results were completely at odds with the wild claims of success being promoted on social media by MTI. FXChoice subsequently froze the remaining 1 280 bitcoin (recently sold by liquidators for about R1.1 billion) placed on deposit with it by MTI.
  3. The third period, and MTI’s last, was from October to December 2020. Steynberg alleged that all investors’ bitcoin were transferred from FXChoice to a new broker, Trade 300, supposedly operating out of St Kitts in the Caribbean island of Nevis. A total of 16 444 bitcoin was claimed to have been transferred in four lots, but when the FSCA investigated, it concluded that Trade 300 was a fraudulent creation of Steynberg’s and does not exist as a bona fide brokerage.

All MTI investors’ bitcoin are unaccounted for or lost

According to the affidavit filed by lead liquidator Riaan van Rooyen: “Based on evidence provided by Steynberg that the 1 282 bitcoin frozen by FXChoice were not part of MTI’s clients’ bitcoin pool, but belonged to MTI and Steynberg personally, the conclusion is inescapable that all of the bitcoin held by MTI for the purpose of trading on behalf of its clients … appear to be either siphoned away by Mr Steynberg, alternatively depleted by ongoing payments of vast amounts of bitcoin to investors in respect of referral commissions, the binary bonus scheme and the payment of fictitious profits that were declared and credited in favour of clients on their back office accounts (which had to be paid to an investor when he/she withdrew his/her investment).”

No audited accounts

The people in charge of MTI had no qualifications for the posts to which they were appointed, according to the liquidators.

Monica Coetzee was appointed by MTI’s marketing executive Cheri Marks, first as a non-executive director, then an executive director. Her background was as an estate agent and legal secretary.

Her starting salary was R15 000 a month, which was later bumped to R40 000, and then one bitcoin a month (currently worth around R500 000), which was paid to her by Steynberg via a service provider called Coin Buyers Club.

Based on the evidence provided by the liquidators, MTI was owned 50-50 by Steynberg and Clynton Marks, who would divvy up 10% of the profits between them every Monday.

Steynberg calculated what the profits were, while expenses were paid from three loan accounts in the name of Steynberg, Clynton Marks and JNX Online (one of Steynberg’s companies). Ledgers obtained under subpoena show MTI owed JNX Online R7.1 million, Clynton Marks R439 530 and Steynberg R549 529.

‘Exclusive control’

Coetzee confirmed during testimony that Steynberg had exclusive management control of MTI’s back-office system.

The accountant, RDK Accountants, requested on numerous occasions the supporting documentation and invoices for payments authorised by Steynberg, but these were never forthcoming. Steynberg was the sole signatory on the MTI bank account.

Each month Steynberg would transfer sufficient bitcoin to Coin Buyers Club to convert to rand and then pay salaries and other expenses.

Steynberg also appears to have been the only person in MTI to deal with both the broker in Belize and the server team in India. He would supply trading results from the broker to the server team for capture into the back-office system.

MTI’s accountant (who joined in August 2020) and other executives were pushing for revenue to be declared, though this never happened.

MTI’s accounts reflected only expenses, and therefore the company was showing a huge loss.

Layers of lies

When Cheri Marks confronted Steynberg about FXChoice’s statement that MTI had made substantial trading losses and that this did not correspond with the trading statements that were posted on the MTI back office, Steynberg told her that FXChoice was lying – because it was upset about losing a big client like MTI and was not happy being bombarded with clients’ queries after the Texas State Security Regulator issued a cease-and-desist order on MTI.

Evidence from FXChoice shows MTI (and presumably Steynberg) was fabricating trading results by redacting losing demo trades to show positive gains, and reporting these as genuine trades.

Steynberg was able to lie and deceive his way through this, and convince his management team that FXChoice was the one that was lying out of jealousy.

Steynberg did not consult MTI management, nor his 50% shareholder Clynton Marks, before allegedly transferring all the bitcoin from FXChoice to Trade 300. “Initially, they were all upset, but accepted Mr Steynberg’s explanation that FXChoice was lying (about the losses made by MTI),” according to Riaan van Rooyen’s affidavit.

Steynberg explained to management that FXChoice had only frozen MTI bitcoin, not the bitcoin of MTI members’ trading pool, which comprised about 10 000 bitcoin in digital wallets, according to Clynton Marks’s affidavit.

First red flag internally

The first red flag for Cheri Marks was when the FSCA put out a statement on December 17, 2020, in which it confirmed to have found information that Steynberg had created Trade 300.

Steynberg convinced his management team that Trade 300 was an unregulated broker and that would avoid the risk of funds being frozen in the future. The management team accepted this explanation.

“I pause to note that it is clear that Cheri Marks is not (and never was) prepared to accept the obvious and uncontroversial reality that Mr Steynberg ran a fraudulent scheme of gigantic proportions,” deposes Van Rooyen.

The liquidators express their frustration with the MTI management team and their lack of suspicion and scepticism at the ever-changing narrative spun by Steynberg who, they aver, was treated as a godlike figure.

Too big to handle …

The liquidators’ court filings, which include the FSCA report and supporting transcripts of interviews with Steynberg and others involved in the scam, paint a picture of a scamster who was prepared to wing it but who had no real clue how to close out a Ponzi scheme that had grown beyond his wildest dreams.

The developer of the automated trading bot, a Keith Badenhhorst, gave testimony to the effect that he was involved in the early development of a trading bot, but had virtually nothing to do with MTI for several years. This contradicted Steynberg’s testimony.

What is extraordinary about this story is that the FSCA first warned the public in August 2020 to get their money out of MTI.

Despite this, the number of investors shot from about 60 000 to some 280 000, and that says something about the marketing acumen of the people behind MTI.

They convinced investors that the FSCA, the banks and the “mainstream” were out to shut them down because they had a system that could deliver financial freedom to the ordinary man and woman.

One word explains this extraordinary growth in membership, says Van Rooyen: “Covid.”

Read:

AUTHOR PROFILE

COMMENTS   20

Sort by:
  • Oldest first
  • Newest first
  • Top voted

You must be signed in to comment.

SIGN IN SIGN UP

“paint a picture of a scamster who was prepared to wing it but who had no real clue how to close out a Ponzi scheme that had grown beyond his wildest dreams.”

He had no end in mind from the start. For one bitcoin an hour I could have helped the guy.

So where is Johann Steynberg? Has he not been found since December 2020?
He should be held accountable for this. As much as people invested after being warned, that does not excuse that he should be held accountable…

He is in Brazil enjoying pina coladas and eating copious amounts of Brazalian guava.

..they claim “blockchain is an irrefutable record”. Yet it’s unable to trace a person’s records.

I like how the persons caught up in this are called investors… speculators, or otherwise suckers, would be more accurate.

Not sure how anyone that puts money into cryptocurrency can be deemed to be an “investor”

Not all of them were suckers. There were, according to rumours, cynics who knew full well that this was a pyramid scheme, but figured out that there was a quick buck to be made, provided you could get in and out quickly enough. The early “investors” in Krion and Kubus also made money, but the liquidators came after them. The anonymous nature of bitcoin made this safer for the MTI cynics.

As to the supposed first red flag of Cheri Marks:

BS, she was told the truth much much earlier and decided to dismiss those red flags, so it was not the first red flag, just an excuse, trying to make herself seem innocent.

100% agree. There is no way in hell you could be paid one Bitcoin per month and not know whats happening or where the money is coming from, all this coming from R15k per month! Unbelievable!

Seen from a cause and effect perspective, MTI was a fitness test for financial literacy. This scam was an entry-level test in basic investment principles. It is a monkey puzzle, true is wrong. False is correct. Those who joined failed the basic test. Those who read the Moneyweb articles passed with flying colors.

Ponzi schemes test the ability of people to think independently, to consider conflicting information, to compare it to the legal framework, to put it in the context of alternative investments, to control irrational exuberance, to ignore peer pressure, and to be satisfied with normal investment gains.

It is quite a difficult test for novices. This is why so many people are so eager to pay such a lot of money to fail the test. The same people will try the same test over and over again and still fail every time.

Greed was central to the whole scheme! Steynberg’s greed was nothing compared to the greed of the lemmings who blindly followed him. As they say, a fool and his money…

Have a Ponzi Scheme ever been successfully closed out?

Luv this part “MTI was owned 50-50 by Steynberg and Clynton Marks, who would divvy up 10% of the profits between them every Monday.”.

Would love to be a fly on the wall to witness this trough feeding exercise.

….never mind a fly on the wall 😉 I’d rather be a chip or malware program inside their computer.

Yarwell no fine – another post removed by Moneyweb – was it because of my view that the FCSA is a re-active regulator?

“What is extraordinary about this story is that …” a few billion Rands have disappeared, along with Mr Steynberg. What happened to Interpol?

But it is reassuring that there is a use for Bitcoin after all.

What is strange is even with Bitcoin dropping half its value over the past few weeks it is still worth double what it was when our man disappeared and the whole thing stopped.

So if the Bitcoin has not been stolen and is still in the “bank” (hahaha) why are they being declared “Bankrupt”??

Because most of the bitcoin is missing?

Poor Cheri Marks. Getting involved for the second time in a Ponzi operation. How convenient that Stynberg is not to be found. Me thinks that Steynberg was deliberately set up by the Marks duo right from the beginning to take the blame once the whole fraud explodes. They had experience from their previous Bitcoin Scam where about 27 000
” investors ” were separated from their money. In their first con the mystery man also vanished without a trace and with him the Bitcoins. All pure coincidence ? PLEAZZZE !

“says something about the marketing acumen”

Ag Asseblief! This is an insult to us real sales professionals.

They were punting this to the greedy, desperate, ignorant and financial hopefuls.

Reminds me of the old Herman Pretorius Ponzi.

End of comments.

LATEST CURRENCIES  

USD / ZAR
GBP / ZAR
EUR / ZAR
BTC / USD
INSIDER SUBSCRIPTIONS APP VIDEOS RADIO / LISTEN LIVE SHOP OFFERS WEBINARS NEWSLETTERS TRENDING PORTFOLIO TOOL CPD HUB

Follow us:

Search Articles: Advanced Search
Click a Company: