Proudly sponsored by

Can Twitter survive banning Donald Trump?

Social media platform’s future is complicated.
Image: Bloomberg

Twitter has done something that was once thought unimaginable. It shut down one of its biggest attractions — Donald Trump’s account — and in doing so also canceled a sitting US president.

The ban and public-safety rationale behind it are part of a wave of crackdowns on the public digital spaces where the president’s most radicalised supporters congregate, and it comes in response to the violence and bloodshed of last week’s assault on the Capitol. Over the weekend, fledgling conservative social network Parler’s was effectively shut off by the technology giants it relied on to reach its user base – including its removal from Google’s and Apple Inc.’s app stores and the decision by Inc. Amazon Web Services to stop hosting Parler’s service. While the logic behind the actions was legitimate, the latest developments illustrate the power these companies possess as gatekeepers of content and information; their willingness to exercise that power opens a new chapter in the story of Big Tech.

Moneyweb Insider INSIDERGOLD

Subscribe for full access to all our share and unit trust data tools, our award-winning articles, and support quality journalism in the process.

Choose an option:

R63 per month
R630 per year SAVE R126

You will be redirected to a checkout page.
To view all features and options, click here.

A monthly subscription is charged pro rata, based on the day of purchase. This is non-refundable and includes a R5 once-off sign-up fee.
A yearly subscription is refundable within 14 days of purchase and includes a 365-day membership.

Click here for more information.

The actions were the right thing to do and inevitable at this point, as I argued last week, even if they do raise larger questions about technology companies as the arbiters of discourse and highlight the arbitrary nature of the standards and rules that govern content across the industry. The evidence is incontrovertible that the angry mob had used Facebook, Twitter and Parler to coordinate their Jan. 6 attack. Twitter said one of the main reasons for its suspension was a proliferation of posts planning future armed rallies after Trump’s most recent tweets. To allow the same extremists to again use public platforms to incite more violence would be irresponsible given the events of last week, so it’s good they’ve been shut down.

However justified the moves were, Twitter especially faces concrete business implications. For better or worse, banning Trump — whose constant controversial statements and posts stoked much of the fervent debate and discussion on the platform in recent years — will curb user growth and engagement. The numbers speak for themselves: The president’s account had roughly 90 million followers, compared with the 187 million monetisable average daily active users Twitter reported in its most recent quarter. Many of his supporters are already threatening to leave Twitter in protest. Good riddance? Perhaps. But investors have already grown skittish over the risks. The company’s stock price declined 4.5% since Wednesday’s riot, and then fell an additional 3.8% in after hours Friday following the Trump ban news.

Unlike the other technology giants that have taken a stand — all of which have strong balance sheets and generally thriving businesses — Twitter has been struggling to fix several core problems, from lack of innovation to inferior ad-platform technology and security lapses. On top of all that, CEO Jack Dorsey has come under criticism from activist investor Elliott Management. Despite a recent rebound in its stock price since last summer on rising optimism for an advertising recovery, Twitter now faces a bumpier future. And while the curbs on competitors such as Parler may on the margin keep some of Trump’s users from departing, it won’t be enough to overcome Twitter’s challenges.

What should Twitter do? It needs to attract more users through innovative features beyond its core service and find ways to monetize them. It has failed to do either over the last decade. To be fair, the company has been trying in recent months. Last November, Twitter launched Fleets, a knock-off version of Instagram Stories and Snapchat Stories. So far, however, it doesn’t seem to be taking off. In my experience, a large portion of the stories on Fleets are just screenshots of individual tweets, defeating the purpose of the new feature. Twitter is also testing an audio-based chat room product called Spaces, again copying the competition — this time venture-backed startup Clubhouse. But the success of these two offerings is not assured.

Perhaps most demoralising for Twitter’s investors is that the company’s user base is driving the surging growth behind two of the hottest startups out there — the aforementioned Clubhouse and paid email newsletter service Substack. Anecdotally, Twitter may have already fallen too far behind both. Since linking my Twitter account to Substack and Clubhouse, I have received frequent daily notifications that show a stunning inflow of Twitter users I follow joining the startups’ platforms. It’s not just word of mouth either: Substack’s emails and Clubhouse’s app offer single-click access to subscribe or follow these new accounts. The reality is they are riding on Twitter’s rails for free in expanding their memberships. In a year, Twitter shareholders may again lament how the company missed out on the next big thing in these two lucrative new growth areas Twitter should have dominated.

At the end of the day, Twitter should be applauded in putting public interest over its profits. But its future, already cloudy, is now decidedly more complicated.

© 2021 Bloomberg


Sort by:
  • Oldest first
  • Newest first
  • Top voted

You must be signed in to comment.


This event with Twitter and Amazon with Google cancelling servers for Parler has global politicians moving their fat posteriors into imagining the power grab at hand

Stifle opinion, squash it like its done in China by picking up the phone to media companies to cancel sectors of society

Soon “url” addresses will be suspended to block access to websites critical of governments and social media companies at hand

China has set the stage and the feudalism is the result

lol..China actually stifles fake information and misinformation to protect the western world

Twitter has rules against inciting violence and there are new rules against misinformation. If they did not suspend Trump it would have lead to a bigger problem. These are the rules. They are simple to follow.

Trump never incited violence. What about BLM and Antifa inciting violence for months on Twitter, including Dem politicians. Nothing happened.

This is purely a move by the swamp to try to muzzle Trump and is going to fail and will lead to the downfall of Twitter, which is already losing money hand over fist.

Don’t forget your tin foil hat antifa can read your mind 😀

Yet they allow excrement such as BLM and the EFF their access? The f^%$ng hypocrisy is mind boggling.

Big Tech are a bunch of entitled little pricks that need to be chopped down by any means necessary.

Why don’t the right wing just create their own cloud service and mobile phone platforms?

People shout about freedom of speech but seem ignorant of the Law: The amendment prohibits the STATE from limiting free speech. It has nothing to do with forcing private companies to provide their services to anybody that breaches their T&C.

Go buy your own megaphone, basically.

If you choose to read the article, you will see that they did – Parler. Which has now been yanked from Apple & Google app stores, with Amazon refusing to host their servers.

DHawker: I said “own cloud services and mobile phone plarforms”.

Maybe the crazies that are so upset should express their disgust in Google and Amazon and Twitter and YouTube and Apple and FaceBook etc etc ect by boycotting those products and services,

The rubbish being shouted by left and right nuts needs to stop. Freedom of speech is not free from responsibility.

Only way to do that is to remove the shield these platforms presently have against being sued.

It is absurd that MNY and NYT and broadcast media are held to standards and accountable but Twitter and Facebook can reap all the ad revenue with none of the liability.

Don’t tell me it is too hard. Life is hard. You want the big bucks and call yourself a technology platform, then deploy some of the money on better technology.

Does anyone really want to hear Mr. Trump again?
four years of boast full sales talk.

Please bring the next puppet show “Biden & Harris”,
guaranteed to be lots of fun.

American social media apps are full of hate,racists,conspiracy theorists,
warmongers.They all spread american crap.
That is way tinpot politicians are on these apps eg Juju,Trump,Modi,..

What they managed to do, is highlight alternatives to their products. They will eat their own cake, as they played their cards early revealing their true colors. Destroy the truth at all cost and isolate competition

End of comments.





Follow us:

Search Articles:Advanced Search
Click a Company: