You are currently viewing our desktop site, do you want to visit our Mobile web app instead?

Changes to anti-avoidance rules putting BEE deals at risk

Lack of guidance is creating uncertainty around otherwise probably innocent transactions, says Sait.
The proposed amendments were announced by finance minister Tito Mboweni in the February budget, but no further guidance has been forthcoming. Picture: Elmond Jiyane, GCIS

Companies that have been contemplating corporate restructuring or even black economic empowerment (BEE) transactions have been wary of proceeding because of looming anti-avoidance rules.

Proposed amendments to the rules regulating dividend stripping arrangements were announced in the February budget, with effect from budget day, with no further guidance.

Previously, when Treasury wanted to prevent avoidance with immediate effect, draft legislation was generally released with the announcement.

The current budget announcement is completely open-ended, creating risk for a number of otherwise probably innocent transactions, warns the South African Institute of Tax Professionals (Sait). 

Dividend stripping

National Treasury has not responded to questions sent to it by Moneyweb on the matter. The practice Treasury has been trying to curb relates to dividend stripping in order to avoid taxation on share disposals.

Companies have achieved this by declaring large dividends to corporate shareholders prior to the sale of their shares, thereby diluting the value of the shares.

Last year’s changes introduced the concept of an “extraordinary dividend”.

This dividend must have been received within 18 months prior or as part of a share disposal arrangement. If the dividend exceeds 15% of the market value of the shares, the excess amount will be added to the proceeds for capital gains tax or income tax purposes when the share is sold.

However, Treasury is of the view that these adjusted rules are being undermined by some taxpayers.

In essence, Treasury has repeatedly wanted to target arrangements where a company (Company A) wants to sell its shares in an underlying company (Company B). The underlying company then declares a large dividend to the company holding its shares, and subsequently issue shares to third parties.

Adjustment not triggered

The effect is that the value of the shares of the underlying company is severely diluted, and is not disposed of immediately. Therefore it does not trigger the anti-avoidance adjustment.

David Warneke, head of tax technical at BDO, says it appears the wording in Annexure C of the Budget Review refers to arrangements where there is not an immediate disposal of the shares.

This is where BEE transactions may be affected. “Often BEE transactions rely on the declaration of a dividend by a company to extract the pre-existing value in the company in favour of the current corporate shareholders.”

This dilutes the value of the shares in the company and BEE shareholders can be introduced into the company, he says.

“This seems to be one of the transactions that can be hit by the proposal, and I do not know whether that was the intention,” says Warneke.

Introducing anti-avoidance measures to curb these transactions can interfere with BEE structuring in a fundamental way, he adds.

Mike Benetello, a tax executive at ENS Africa, says in the past mechanisms were legitimately used to reduce values in companies to allow for the entrance of BEE participants at full value.

Getting around the rule

Instances where the purchaser bought into a company after a large dividend was paid to the existing shareholder, with a percentage of the shares kept for 18 months, was obviously an arrangement to get around the 18-month disposal rule.

Contrast that with a BEE transaction where there is a 100% shareholder who wants to introduce a BEE partner at 30%. The options are to either reduce the value of the company and let the BEE partner come in at full value, or give the shares away for free. Needless to say, not everybody is willing to do that.

“When stripping the value in these transactions, it was not to avoid paying tax, but to introduce a BEE partner,” says Benetello. “I do think logic will prevail and when the draft legislation is put forward there may be a carve-out for BEE-type transactions. However, it will be difficult to do.”

Tertius Troost, senior tax consultant at Mazars, says the uncertainty about which transactions will be affected impacts on tax professionals’ ability to advise clients on transactions.


He gives the example of the owner of a small business who wants to bring a BEE partner into the business. The arrangement used quite often in the past was for the underlying company to declare a dividend equal to the value of the business to its corporate shareholder – this is done tax-free since a dividend between South African resident companies is exempt from dividend-withholding tax.

The dividend usually remains outstanding on loan account.

The new shareholder (BEE partner) can subsequently subscribe for shares in the company for a nominal amount, since the assets of the company will be equal to its liabilities.

Warneke says while it is understandable that Treasury wants to curb tax avoidance, it is unclear how it is going to draft legislation to give effect to the policy issue.

Sait CEO Keith Engel says the real problem is that many technical ‘tax’ dividends are, in reality, capital distributions. 

“The current elective system means that taxpayers can freely choose the desired outcome even if that outcome does not comport with reality.”

Other legislation, such as BEE, pushes taxpayers into transactions that lack normal commercial reality solely to satisfy other non-tax regulatory objectives.

“While it is widely accepted that Treasury should not provide incentives for BEE, tax should not be imposed as an added hurdle,” says Engel.

Get access to Moneyweb's financial intelligence and support quality journalism for only
R63/month or R630/year.
Sign up here, cancel at any time.



You must be signed in to comment.


As with all forms of taxation, BEE deals will become ever more convoluted and obscure, so as to minimize its impact on companies. And let’s face facts: BEE is nothing but a drain and an extra tax on companies. Racist BEE is also of an extremely dubious moral nature, in addition to being an anticompetitive drain on companies and the economy. Like apartheid, BEE will eventually collapse. You can only legalize racialized theft for so long, before market forces will kill it off.

I wonder why participants (sellers) in BEE transactions participate if there is no benefit for them? BEE is voluntary (and is certainly NOT like apartheid) afterall.

Yeah right; like sports quota’s are “voluntary”. You have a choice, conform or don’t take part in SA. Many, many, elect not to take part and emigrate, investment, business and personal.

For most businesses, racist BEE is anything BUT voluntary. It is nothing but an egregious continuation of apartheid, and is killing the economy.

No benefit? Who benefitted from the world cup soccer stadiums? BEE tenders.Who benefits from ESkom work? BEE Tenders. Who benefits from municipality outsourced work? BEE Tenderers. All SOE’s have BEE companies benefitting! Its legalised stealing and allows your cadres and buddies to all get rich. Theres the benefit! Where is the value creation and the efficiency focus? When BEE is allowed to run amock you have 10 years of stealing and inflation because there is no competition as fitting the BEE criteria with no skills an expertise gets the job but the project does not get completed! Another example is the BEE tenders for the sewerage treatment plants specifically 44 plants standing by and redirecting sewerage into the vaal river system. Those BEE tenderers have staken the money and disappeared! thats whats going on and its not rocket science to figure it out! The latest Eskom split into 3 is just another BEE scam! If eskom simply had qualified,honest personnel to operate it as before then it would get out of debt and be operational and efficient!

End of comments.


Insider GOLD
ONLY R63pm

Moneyweb's premium subscription is a membership service which will give you access to a number of tools to take charge of your investments.
Choose a yearly subscription at R630pa - SAVE R126

Get instant access to all our tools and content. Monthly subscription can be cancelled at any time.

Follow us:

Search Articles:Advanced Search
Click a Company: