You are currently viewing our desktop site, do you want to visit our Mobile web app instead?
 Registered users can save articles to their personal articles list. Login here or sign up here

Smoke and mirrors

Africa has little to show for its efforts at the G7 and Ticad meetings, where powerful nations’ self-interest was top priority.

There is no doubt that the power hierarchies among states and regions continue to shape the international economy and politics. This was evident at last week’s G7 meeting when the discussion on Russia and Iran dominated the gathering.

On display was how the behaviour and actions of politicians have a detrimental effect on global economic and other important issues. (In the process strengthening the argument that South Africa is not unique when it comes to politicians messing things up.)

Interestingly, Iran and Russia – despite not being on the agenda – hogged the spotlight with the argument over whether they should have been invited. Earlier reports indicated that French President Emmanuel Macron had invited Iranian foreign affairs minister Mohammad Javad Zarif to the meeting – an action that would be deemed an insult and undermining to President Donald Trump, as the US wasn’t consulted. The 2015 Iran nuclear deal remains a thorny issue.

Although France and the US differ on the Iran matter, they agree somewhat on Russia. Both Macron and Trump are of the view that Russia should be invited to join the next meeting to be hosted by US in 2020. As you would expect, this caused murmurings among other G7 members; in fact they are quite critical of the suggestion. It has infuriated some critics of Trump back in the US and caused rumblings among some quarters in the Republican party. To them, it is unfathomable that an American president would want Russian President Vladimir Putin back in the circle.

The G7 meeting concluded with little consensus on key global issues. Instead, any potential agreements evaporated and the differences between leaders broadened.

All of this legitimises the realist’s perspective of international politics: the view that dominant states will always pursue their own interests, above everything else.

It is these actions of the powerful states that has South Africa and the rest of Africa reworking their relationships with the other states, in shaping new power hierarchies that have come to dominate international economies and even regions.

The changing pace of global economics

The Tokyo International Conference on African Development (Ticad), which also took place last week, signals the changing pace of the global economy, in which states have to proactively reconfigure their relationships with each other. Mind you, as this was the seventh such meeting, it’s not a novelty.

What has changed, however, is global economics and geopolitics. Globalisation in this period has demonstrated how some once-developing countries have in the past 15 years emerged as economic powers, such as Russia, China and India. While others within a specific region like East Africa have demonstrated their potential for fast growth, their southern African peers have struggled.

Taken together, these two meetings have shown Africa’s participation to be one of African leaders seeking G7 approval and applause for having established a continental agreement.

For example, when President Cyril Ramaphosa presented the Africa Continental Free Trade Area Agreement (AfCFTA) at the meeting, he urged a very preoccupied G7 leadership to continue working with Africa and commended them for reorienting their relationships with the continent. These leaders might applaud AfCFTA, but they won’t go out of their way to make it succeed.

In fact, that couldn’t be further from their aspirations.

Any G7 country that will be working with Africa on free trade will be pursuing what they see as easy pickings, to best serve their interests.

It certainly won’t be based on noble intentions and a moral obligation to advance Africa’s economic growth or development.

Seen this way, while the Japan-Africa meeting might yield some positives here and there for individual countries, at the heart of it lies the reality of a Japan that seeks to reposition itself in relation to a region that has the potential to grow economically and politically in the next 20 years.

Behind the Ticad’s veil of pragmatism and mutually beneficially aims, Japan conceals its deepest fears: losing out to China and Russia.

Understandably, South-South cooperation (between developing countries) post the global financial crisis is defined by China leading, with Russia not so far off the pace in building linkages with Africa. Consider how trade among the Brics partners alone has been a signifier of what some analysts are calling a new model of globalisation, with the focus no longer centred on the West’s financial crisis but on the rapid growth in developing economies.

Developments such as the forming of trade regions and blocs within emerging markets now have the potential to reorient the global economic power structure.

It is important to emphasise that each country – China, Japan and Russia – has self-interest in building economic, cultural and political ties with Africa. Each is motivated by expanding their own power and economic well-being.

What to make of this

First, the emerging South-South cooperation continues to signal a growing shift away from the West. Trade, investment, skills and goods are now exchanged outside the realm of Europe and the US, due to interconnectedness shaped by globalisation.

This is a positive development, provided African leaders position their countries and the region cleverly and move beyond trade that is dominated by selling raw commodities.

Second, the power hierarchies between countries will always determine how powerful states relate to or approach their ties with Africa. Therefore, caution on the part of Africa must always be exercised. History has taught us how the expansion of a state can shape global economies and politics.

In two months, Russia will host its own Africa-Russia conference on economic and political cooperation. The courting of Africa continues.

Ongoing globalisation will continue to shift economic power as it unfolds. Unfortunately for Africa, it continues to be trapped between powerful states that will use it to advance their interests and further remake economies to gain more power.

Get access to Moneyweb's financial intelligence and support quality journalism for only
R63/month or R630/year.
Sign up here, cancel at any time.

AUTHOR PROFILE

COMMENTS   7

To comment, you must be registered and logged in.

LOGIN HERE

Don't have an account?
Sign up for FREE

It is all about policy, and South Africa kind of try to persuade the world that we can have more of socialism than capitalism, which always ends in a disaster, take Zim and Ven in the last 20 years as examples. Policy friendliness attracts investors. Our policies only generated corruption on a massive scale, showed complete ignorance to sanity of what works in developed countries.

I can think of no reason whatsoever why a gathering of leaders of civilised countries should take any notice at all of the demands, desires or comments of so-called leaders of African countries whose performances at home are characterised by gross incompetence and corruption.

I think the rest of the world is just sick and tired of seeing another (self made Haha) billionaire African leader trying to convince them Africa is not looking for freebies while corruption and theft in Africa is the order of the day.

You mean compassionate Ubuntu like we see in JHB right now?? Or last week in Pretoria by killing and maiming “foreigners” and looting and burning their shops??Or Ubuntu like ANC looting Eskom and SAA and Denel and SABC etc.?? Or maybe ubuntu of burning trucks. Suggest you stop reading Ace’s propaganda.

In September president, John Magufuli of Tanzania, told a rally in Meatu, that outsiders who promote birth control are giving bad advice, and that people who use contraceptives are lazy. “You people of Meatu are good farmers. You can feed your children. Why would you opt for birth control? I don’t see any need for birth control in Tanzania,” he said. Today the people of Tanzania are cutting down every single tree they can find for firewood (without replacing them) and slowly turning their country into a dessert. Do you really think the G7 leaders must take African leaders seriously if this is the mindset?

Sadly this was all predicted ie the irrelevance of the African continent. The economist ran an article 20 years ago called -the hopeless continent. They were 100% correct! Africa has sadly lagged behind other emerging economies to a massive degree . And as others grow we become-as we have-less and less relevant. Look at Nigeria -nearly 2/3 of the population of the US-more than France, Italy and Spain combined-yet irrelevant for everything except some oil. Education, correct economic policy, management of crime and corruption and the potential is colossal but until Africa’s population wakes up, elect decent leaders with good policies and be investor friendly, we will become less and less relevant.

Load All 7 Comments
End of comments.

LATEST CURRENCIES  

USD / ZAR
GBP / ZAR
EUR / ZAR

Podcasts

SHOP NEWSLETTERS TRENDING CPD HUB

Follow us:

Search Articles:Advanced Search
Click a Company: