You are currently viewing our desktop site, do you want to visit our Mobile web app instead?
 Registered users can save articles to their personal articles list. Login here or sign up here

We no longer know what’s happening at Eskom

In the absence of any useful updates – what’s really going on?

It was 74 minutes of absolute chaos. Between 17:31pm and 18:45pm on Saturday night, Eskom lurched from Stage 1 load shedding to Stage 2 to Stage 3 and then back to Stage 2.

Stages are an abstraction, and it’s worth quantifying what that actually means. Earlier in the afternoon, we were alerted to the fact that Stage 1 load shedding would start at 17:00. Stage 1 equals a supply shortfall of 1 000MW. Stage 2 equals a 2 000MW shortfall, while Stage 3 is a 3 000MW shortfall.

Now, 1000MW (or even close to 1 000MW) is a pretty big number. For the sake of comparison, it’s practically the equivalent of a full unit at Koeberg, or around two units at one of Eskom’s many coal-fired base load power stations.

Earlier on Saturday afternoon, Eskom spokesperson Khulu Phasiwe told EWN that, “The primary reason is that Unit 3 of Tutuka Power Station, which produces just over 600MW, is now offline because of technical faults”.

You’ve got to look at this through supply and demand lenses. Very simply, demand – especially on a Saturday night – is unlikely to have spiked beyond Eskom’s estimates.

This was almost certainly a supply-side problem.

To go from an expected 1 000MW shortfall to a 3 000MW one means somewhere between 1 000MW and 2 000MW of generation capacity was lost in an hour. This is very abnormal. And then close to 1 000MW of capacity was recovered within 30 minutes (between 18:15pm and 18:45pm).

 

The problem with such rapid changes in load shedding status is that the metros (especially) cannot react quickly enough. The chaos on Joburg City Power’s Twitter account on Saturday night was there for all to see. From what was communicated there, it shifted to Stage 3 at 18:25pm and never shifted back to Stage 2? This, after crowing just two hours prior that there would not be any load shedding at all!

 

There’s surely only one thing worse than knowing jut how bad things are at Eskom, as it battles to maintain generating capacity… And that’s not knowing at all.

This is the situation we find ourselves in.

Previously, the utility published system status bulletins twice a week (on Mondays and Thursdays). These documents provided demand forecasts for the following six days, plus crucial actual peak demand and capacity data for the preceding days. It also provided a breakdown of planned maintenance and unplanned outages for the day of publication.

But, late last month, Eskom made it clear that “the bi-weekly system status bulletin has been discontinued. Status bulletin no. 346 issued on 21 May 2015 was the last one. In order to ensure that we keep the media and our stakeholders informed of the status of the power system, we have been issuing general power alerts on a regular basis”.

This was a month after Brian Molefe’s secondment to the utility as Acting CEO. It’s interesting that such a radical change (still not noticed by the media) was made, particularly with load shedding occurring on 56 out of the 151 days to end May this year. Remember, these status bulletins have been published since Brian Dames made the call in January 2012.

Perversely, Eskom claims it’s communicating more often than it was previously. Except there’s no data at all. We simply do not know how much generating capacity the utility has on any given day in any given week. Nor do we know what demand is, or how that demand is being met.

A black box.

Instead, we’re told in email alerts that very often arrive well after load shedding is implemented that, “This is due to a further shortage of generating capacity and increased electricity demand. Any unexpected changes on the vulnerable and constrained power system could lead to a change in the load shedding stage at short notice”.

In fact, its 181-word power alert for the change to Stage 3 on Saturday night contains no more information than its 137-character tweet. Eskom’s four tweets from its Media Desk account told us just as much as its six power alert emails on Saturday totaling nearly 1 000 words.

In its state of the system briefing last week, Eskom produced this gem: “The recent load shedding from Monday, 8 June 2015 to Friday, 12 June 2015 was the result of an increase in demand and an increase in unplanned breakdowns.”

Thankfully, there is one way of figuring out what the status of Eskom’s generation capacity is. Electricity demand has hardly increased meaningfully since last year (that’s a story for another day). So, using Eskom’s status bulletins from 2014, we know that on Saturday June 21, 2014, peak demand was 33 168MW. But it’s winter, and some weekends will be colder than others. On Saturday June 28, 2014, peak demand was 31 495MW, while on Saturday June 14, 2014, (a long weekend), it was 31 965MW.

So, we’re likely looking at peak demand this past Saturday of somewhere between 31 500MW and 33 000MW. Subtract the 1 000MW to 3 000MW of unfulfilled demand (load shedding), and Eskom’s capacity on Saturday night (when it lurched to Stage 3 for 30 minutes) was somewhere between 28 500MW and 30 000MW, likely at the lower end of that range. The fact that load shedding reverted to Stage 2 means a more ‘normalised’ capacity figure would be somewhere between 29 500MW and 31 000MW.

So, roughly 12 500MW (best case) to 14 000MW (worst case) was unavailable.

Eskom’s installed capacity (including Cahora Bassa) is 43 500MW. That means somewhere between 29% and 32% of its generating capacity was offline.

This is consistent with expert Chris Yelland’s calculations.

Also during its state of the system briefing last week, the utility said: “On average Eskom has a maintenance budget of 7 000MW in winter, which is dependent on demand requirements.”

Aside from the awful lot of hedging in that sentence, any bets as to whether this is being achieved?

* Hilton Tarrant works at immedia. 

Get access to Moneyweb's financial intelligence and support quality journalism for only
R63/month or R630/year.
Sign up here, cancel at any time.

AUTHOR PROFILE

COMMENTS   2

To comment, you must be registered and logged in.

LOGIN HERE

Don't have an account?
Sign up for FREE

Hilton – I take my hat off to you for persistence in following the drunken state of this state enterprise – I myself have long given up in their stupidity, their persistent incompetence. It is a task just in itself just to try and understand their rationality – its a bit like a badly scripted episode from Star Wars. Far too many people have this indefatigable belief that Brian Molefe is going to sort everything – there will be a rude awakening when they find out that he is not a terribly competent person but he does make the right noises which seems to appease some. His track record at PIC and Transnet are hardly a glossary of his achievements

The question is whether the evident incompetence and lack of transparency is deliberate or unintended ?

End of comments.

LATEST CURRENCIES  

USD / ZAR
GBP / ZAR
EUR / ZAR

Podcasts

SHOP NEWSLETTERS TRENDING CPD HUB

Follow us:

Search Articles:Advanced Search
Click a Company: