Were the Guptas the disease or the parasite?

Corruption did not start with the Guptas, they merely leveraged it.
Ajay and Atul Gupta may have left the country, but the corruption lives on. Image: Supplied

President Cyril Ramaphosa indicated to the Zondo Commission of Inquiry into allegations of state capture that he became aware of the Guptas a decade ago, when current Minister of Transport Fikile Mbalula told the party’s national executive committee in 2011 that he got to hear that he would be appointed as a minister from a member of the Gupta family.

(Mbalula was appointed minister of sport and recreation by former president Jacob Zuma in November 2009).

Discussions around ‘state capture’ and the Guptas’ involvement increased, escalating in 2013 at the time of the infamous ‘Waterkloof landing’ which saw nearly 200 guests of the Gupta family land in a private plane at Pretoria’s Waterkloof Air Force Base, a military base and national keypoint.

Read: Police say Gupta wedding probe part of larger investigation

A media frenzy ensued, with the government desperately trying to sweep the matter under the carpet.

But the Zondo Commission has not asked Ramaphosa, as far as I can tell, when he became aware of corruption within government.

The Guptas’ state capture activities have cost the country close on R60 billion.

The Guptas were however simply milking every source of cash that they could get their hands on. Corruption did not start with the Guptas, they merely leveraged it.

There for the taking …

The infamous family was no doubt well briefed on the state of corruption, the pliability of officials, and the weaknesses in controls at state-owned enterprises.

They knew South Africa was teeming with corrupt officials ripe for the picking.

More devastatingly, they were most probably well aware that the parliamentary watchdog, Scopa, would be paralysed by ANC cadres acting under instruction, and that their activities would continue with no intervention.

Read: Parliamentary watchdog neutered by unresponsive executive body

Otherwise, how could it be possible that they managed to influence so many key political figures, and pull the strings at so many major state-owned entities and government organisations?

How far back should we go?

No country is immune to corruption, and South Africa is no exception – but the level of escalation in this country has been dramatic in recent decades.

To recap, South Africa’s democratically elected presidents include Nelson Mandela (in office from May 1994 to June 1999), Thabo Mbeki (June 1999 to September 2008), Kgalema Motlanthe (September 2008 to May 2009), Zuma (May 2009 to February 2018), and Ramaphosa (since February 15, 2018).

Moeletsi Mbeki, in Architects of Poverty: Why African Capitalism Needs Changing (Picador Africa, April 2009), put forward the proposition that the South African black elite, “which describes itself as made up of previously disadvantaged individuals (PDIs), sees its primary mission as extracting reparations from those who put it in a disadvantaged position”.

This resulted in “the transfer of resources from the wrongdoer”. Mbeki took this further: “By this logic the South African state owes the PDIs high paying jobs.”

Mbeki discusses the consequences that flowed from this, but in regard to state-owned entities (SOEs), he came up with a telling argument that assists in explaining the financial destruction of many SOEs.

Mbeki argued that “one of the most destructive consequences of the reparations ideology is the black elite’s relationship with, and attitude to, the South African state”.

“As the state is said to have been a party to the disadvantaging of the PDIs it is therefore also perceived to owe them something. By way of reparations the state must therefore provide PDIs with high paying jobs.

“By extension, the assets of the state are seen as fair game.”

The reader is reminded that Mbeki’s book was published in April 2009, before Zuma had taken office.

Corruption escalated from 2009

Mbeki then dropped what should have been an explosive claim: “Not surprisingly, corruption under the ANC government has grown by leaps and bounds.”

Mbeki referred to the Transparency International Perceptions Index, which ranks 180 countries and scores each country out of 100. Below 50 indicates considerable corruption.

In 2006, South Africa scored 54 (Trevor Manuel was minister of finance from 1996 to 2009). In 2008 South Africa scored 38. The country’s score improved to 43 in 2012, and in 2020 the score was 44.

Corruption Watch South Africa was established in 2012. That year, 1 227 reports on corruption were submitted to Corruption Watch. Around 34% concerned municipalities, 32.5% government departments, 17.6% national government departments, and 3.4% state-owned entities.

The OECD (Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development) published an economic study in 2013 (available on National Treasury’s website under published documents) wherein one of the main findings was the growing frustration with public service delivery failures and corruption.

It was also mentioned that “corruption appears to be an increasingly important barrier to improved public service delivery”.

“South Africa’s relative standing on Transparency International’s Corruption Perception Index has deteriorated in recent years.”

Plans, and problems

Brief overviews of the National Development Plan (NDP) and the New Growth Path (NGP) were included in the OECD report.

The NDP, published in 2012, set out the growth strategy to 2030. It was produced by the National Planning Committee (NPC). The NGP was released in 2010.

The NPC released a ‘Diagnostics Report’ in June 2011 that identified nine primary challenges facing the economy, including the quality of health care and education, inadequate and poorly located infrastructure, corruption, low employment, an overreliance on natural resources, the uneven quality of public service, and spatial and social divides.

The OECD flagged a potential problem: “It is not clear whether structures have yet been established to monitor progress made in achieving the various targets set in the NDP and NGP, and the extent to which, if at all, government departments will be held accountable should they fail to make progress in achieving the targets.”

The OECD spotted the weakness, there was no monitoring of progress, and government departments have never been held accountable for not achieving targets. 

Official spokesperson ‘removed’

Themba Maseko was CEO of the Government Communication and Information System (GCIS) from June 2006 to February 2, 2009. As CEO, Maseko was the official spokesperson for government and attended cabinet meetings.

In 2010, Ajay Gupta is alleged to have instructed Maseko to divert the government’s entire advertising budget to the family’s media company.

Gupta threatened to have him replaced with someone more compliant. Shortly thereafter Maseko was ‘removed’ from his position.

Ramaphosa was not in government in 2009, so perhaps he was not aware that the government spokesperson – a well-known former student activist and member of the South African Communist Party (SACP) and the ANC underground – had suddenly been replaced in a cloud of Gupta interference.

Maseko has detailed his experience in his book For my Country: Why I Blew the Whistle on Zuma and the Guptas (Jonathan Ball Publishers, May 2021). Maseko was replaced as CEO of GCIS by Mzwanele ‘Jimmy’ Manyi, and was redeployed to the Department of Public Service and Administration as Director-General, where he was sidelined. He left public service at the end of July 2019.

Maseko testified to the Zondo Commission on November 6, 2019.

His ‘Aha’ moment on the Guptas’ influence in government came in March 2013 when South Africa hosted the fifth summit of the BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa) nations.

Atul Gupta was with Zuma, and in fact walked in front of him and the leaders of the other states, and ushered them to their seats.

This would have traditionally been the role of the minister of international relations and cooperation, Maite Nkoana-Mashabane at the time, and certainly not the role of a private citizen.

While Rome burns our president fiddles

Ramaphosa told the Zondo Commission last week that he will wait for the outcome of the commission’s report before he takes any action.

With respect, Mr President …

Moeletsi Mbeki shouted out about corruption in 2009. Corruption was further flagged by the OECD in 2013, and by Transparency International which published its first perceptions index in 1996, and has done so annually ever since.

Read: Ramaphosa won’t take action until the Zondo report is released

For many years the Auditor General’s office has reported on problems at municipalities and SOEs, including key positions vacant, key officials lacking appropriate competencies, no consequence management, problems with supply chain management and procurement, lack of controls, and escalating irregular expenditure.

The Guptas took advantage, and magnified the extent of the corruption. But this was in full view of many state officials, who were willingly complicit. There were far too many red flags to be missed.

The Guptas have gone, but the red flags remain.

The disease is still in government.

It will happen again.



Sort by:
  • Oldest first
  • Newest first
  • Top voted

You must be signed in and an Insider Gold subscriber to comment.


The Guptas just understood the utterly corrupt creed of the ANC and harvested. Guptas would have not been possible without the criminal actions of the ANC crooks.

Corrupting an honest person would be too much work for the Guptas. They found fertile ground to work with.

It is not a case of were the guptas the disease or the parasite – for sure they were and still are representing both – the pitty is that we still sit with the inherited disease and the accumulative negative effect thereof in the sa, whilst the actual parasites are relaxing in dubai with sa money made out of a 100% naive anc government who thought they struck solid gold when the guptas as advisers appeared on their political horizon

Whatever happened to the lone gunman??

My personal view is that the sense of entitlement and lack of accountably for corruption lays firmly at the feet of Mandela when he allowed Dr. Nkosazana Zuma to get away with the Sarafina 2 scandal. This was back in 1996 already and is now deeply entrenched in the culture of our politicians.

‘We did not want to replace a white corrupt Government with our corrupt selves,” said Themba Sono, a professor of economics at the University of the Witswatersrand. ”There are people trying to pretend that what is going on is nothing but the birth pangs of democracy. But that is very dangerous.”

The Guptas are a product of the ANC. They are entrepreneurs who extracted the resources of the nation for personal gain because the ANC’s moral code and ethos incentivized them to do so.

There is always a “Gupta family” in every communalist society. The sharing of resources allows and rewards the most unscrupulous cattle farmer, with the largest herd, to overgraze and degrade the commons to the detriment of the rest of the community. This system incentivizes plunder at the maximum rate. The system rewards plunder and punishes conservation and frugality. Cattle owners are in a race to let their herd consume the grass before their neighbor can do so. In this system, someone can only become wealthy at the expense of others. This is in contrast with the capitalist system that creates wealth and better living standards for everyone who takes part in it.

As an example, simply compare the health of the soil, grass, and cattle on the Transkei(communalist) side of the barbed-wire fence, to the farmer on the South African side who has property rights. These two societies and systems are divided by a 3 mm-thick wire fence. The soil type, rainfall, and climate are the same. On the Transkei side, the cattle are tick-infested, emaciated, and unfertile, the soil is eroded, the field is overgrazed and degraded, and the people are poor and hungry. The owner of the title deed, on the other side of the fence, owns a car and a bakkie, his children go to university, he has a flush toilet and internet. This is not a race issue or apartheid issue. This is an economic systems issue.

There will always be another Gupta family as long as the ANC rules the country. In fact, there are at least 1000 small Guptas operating right under our noses at this very moment. The ANC cannot act against corruption because it is part of their DNA. We will need perpetual Zondo commissions as long as the ANC is in control of the assets of the nation.

I have to agree with these comments…..sad but true!

Even the name “state capture” is false. There was no such thing. It is unchecked intentional and systematic corruption and theft by the corrupt ANC and friends of taxpayers money in the name of Africa transformation. Guptas mere parasites.

The Guptas were an extention of the ANC’s looting arm….

ANC could not legally extract the wealth of SA…. so they used the Gupta’s to do so…..

Little did the ANC know that the Guptas will keep all the loot for themselves.

Amazing to see how Indians from India were treated like Gods.

This comment is spot on. An erstwhile member of the ANC a while ago commented as such where i was present? The Guptas was used to extract loot. Little did they know of the favoured disproportional sharing?

The Guptas were simply ticks on a rabid dog. The dog was rabid long before the Gupta ticks jumped on and remains rabid to this day. This rabid dog was fat for many year and as a result many ticks have come and left with their coffers and those of their families and cronies filled to overflowing. The feeding trough is emptying out fast as these rabid dogs have an insatiable appetite for looting and as a result they are starting to turn on each other now in an effort to hang onto the diminishing pickings. These rabid dogs have clearly split into two packs and are competing fiercely, spurred on by their ticks for the remaining spoils. The dogs will die but only when there is nothing left to loot, and this will be when there is nothing left of our beloved country.
Nkosi sikelel iAfrika.

When the Covid billions were stolen by ANC cadres, the Guptas were long gone and Cyril was in charge. Draw your own conclusions.

The ANC was the disease and the parasite, the Guptas were just the parasite.

And now Nosiviwe Mapisa-Nqakula has been confirmed as the new National Assembly Speaker, despite being under investigation. As the rusty wheel turns…

Corrupt Indians woke up a lot sooner than corrupt Africans ( of all races) one has to wonder where they learnt the lesson from originally? Colonialism perhaps? Where there is opportunity you will find corruption. Where there is no opportunity, corruption is called survival.

End of comments.



Instrument Details  

You do not have any portfolios, please create one here.
You do not have an alert portfolio, please create one here.

Follow us:

Search Articles:
Click a Company: