You are currently viewing our desktop site, do you want to visit our Mobile web app instead?
 Registered users can save articles to their personal articles list. Login here or sign up here

Decades of financial norms have been turned on their head

Changing how we understand things, and affecting pricing and thus risk in markets.

Something is occurring in the global credit markets that is quite likely unprecedented in financial history.

The amount of negative yielding bonds has recently registered an all-time high – pushing beyond $12 trillion and now above the previous record set in 2016. Lenders are paying borrowers for the ‘privilege’ of lending them money, or borrowers are being paid to borrow.

Further, Italy and Austria came to market issuing very long duration bonds. Austria managed to get a 98-year bond issue at a 1.17% interest rate (it was about four times oversubscribed). Italy, despite its economic and political risk and challenges, concluded a 48-year issue at an incredible 2.85% yield.

These developments imply that investors seem desperate for yield, but more importantly that they may be very complacent toward risk.

Negative yields turn decades of accepted financial norms on their head, impacting how we understand matters such as the time value of money, and with serious implications for the pricing of money and thus risk in markets. The ramifications of such a growing development cannot be brushed aside as its impact could be widespread. For example, how do retirement funds for whom such bonds are an important asset class in their portfolio deal with this?

Negative yields are not the only change.

The double-edged sword of tech

Other noted developments are the rapid change and enhancements in technology. With this come risks to existing jobs that might be replaced by technological advancements. While productive capacity and efficiencies may be enhanced, the potential replacement of human resources is an ever-present concern.

Albeit that new jobs may be created in the process, it may impact a generation of people trained and skilled in disciplines that cannot compete with technology.

Is the world on its way to inadvertently curtailing the very markets (workers as consumers) to which it is aiming to sell?

What is the end game – the ultimate implications and consequences – of this?

The cryptic crypto space

Adding to the developments, cryptocurrencies have been in vogue. Their volatility has been quite a wild ride for investors in this space. US Federal Reserve chair Jerome Powell called for a moratorium on developing the Facebook cryptocurrency Libra, with privacy and money laundering two of the issues he brought up when making this call, at least until it could be properly vetted.

US President Donald Trump has also called for such ventures to be subject to due US banking regulations and requirements. To what extent these developments will potentially impact the existing financial structure, if allowed, remains to be seen. Governments and central banks will not accept threats to their powers that such developments potentially pose.

Autocracy on the rise

It is also a fact that authoritarian tendencies have been on the rise all over the world. One need only observe the leadership and the policies they pursue in a number of countries such as the US, Russia and Turkey – and China removing the presidential term limit, leading to a potential president for life.

Global expansion, global contraction?

“The global expansion is now the longest in modern history,” says Dario Perkins, MD of global macro at TS Lombard. “But this impressive record masks low and patchy growth, dismal productivity and clear polarisation.”

As long as debt continues to grow as it is doing presently, the risk is that the world will stay in a slow-growth economic environment at best, if not in recession at some point. Much research has shown that a continued increase in debt will reduce GDP growth over time as the marginal contribution to economic growth declines with ever growing debt levels beyond a certain point.

The post 2008 global financial crisis (GFC) period is ‘a new normal’ as some would put it, thereby recognising its unprecedented nature. Given the softer economic growth environment, a number of central banks have gone dovish with policy. It is remarkable that after 10 years of emergency policy measures, the global economic environment still needs the ‘life support’ of quantitative easing and dovish monetary policy.

There are limits to monetary action and, should it be inadequate, policy focus may likely shift to fiscal actions in an attempt to ‘keep the show on the road’.

A euphemism for ‘this doesn’t make sense’

What I find striking is the use of the word ‘despite’ in media headlines over the last while. For example, Stocks rally despite ongoing trade tensions, or Stocks rally despite weak US jobs numbers.

‘Despite’ could be another way of saying price action in stocks is not making much sense to most conventional market observers.

Furthermore, price moves have been quite dramatic – and seemingly disconnected – in response to news. For a largely macro policy/stimulus-driven market since the GFC, we are currently observing its fragility when suddenly faced with changes in policy actions (in this case the escalation of trade wars spilling over into currency wars), further compounded by slowing global growth momentum.

And so change – in essence catalysed by human actions – remains rather inevitable as the above examples illustrate.

Whether we are on the cusp of major inflection points or change is up to market pundits and the astute to discern. We do not know for certain what the future really holds. The wise will simply accept this and know that conventional market wisdom may be confounded in different dispensations.

Fabian de Beer is director of investments at Mergence Investment Managers.

Get access to Moneyweb's financial intelligence and support quality journalism for only
R63/month or R630/year.
Sign up here, cancel at any time.

COMMENTS   6

To comment, you must be registered and logged in.

LOGIN HERE

Don't have an account?
Sign up for FREE

The financial markets have decoupled from the real world economy. Just as they did in Zimbabwe. The stock market soared while the real economy tanked.

Positive interest rates are sustainable only with exponential economic growth, so negative rates tell you that economies are contracting.

Never mind the GDP numbers they’re printing. These are fictional

I agree with your comment. I recently discovered that about 85% of German bonds are in negative territory.
It appears, the JSE is punching above its weight.
Maybe the measure of GDP is also up for revamping or another yard stick to be adopted?

The biggest change will be when the sting of excessive usury is taken out of the money lenders hands.

When we price the Bloomberg Commodity Index in terms of ounces of gold, and not in terms of the US dollar, the picture becomes clear.

The Bloomberg Commodity Index is trading at the lowest levels since inception in 1991. In real terms, the index is 89% below the high of the year 2000. The extent of the deflationary collapse is described clearly by the ratio of the BCom Index to the gold price. Prices are determined by supply and demand dynamics ok?. So, what does it tell us when the price of commodities crashed by 89%, in terms of purchasing power, in a decade? Well, it tells us that there is a massive oversupply in the midst of slow demand. The market is supposed to correct itself in a situation like this. The supply is supposed to adapt to the level of demand. Why does this not happen? How can producers manage to stay in business when margins have evaporated?

The previous secretary-general of OPEC, Abdallah Salem el-Badri, told it like it is: “It is not an oversupply of oil that drives the price down, there is an oversupply of cheap credit”. Reserve Banks are sending false signals to the markets. By lowering interest rates, they signal that there is an abundance of savings to invest in production. Pension funds looking for yield buy the bonds of Fracking companies and mining companies. They buy farms and invest in hedge funds that produce agricultural commodities. Low-interest rates create a deflationary spiral in commodities. Farmers are paying the price for the Financial Crisis. Reserve Bank action is bankrupting primary producers across the globe. We are living in is a deflationary collapse.

They need to reverse the QE madness. Let the markets do the job and keep politicians away, they have too many delusions of grandeur.

This is why we use bitcoin. If you think the 2008 crisis was bad, just wait…things are about to get insane.

Load All 6 Comments
End of comments.

LATEST CURRENCIES  

USD / ZAR
GBP / ZAR
EUR / ZAR

Podcasts

NEWSLETTERS WEB APP SHOP PORTFOLIO TOOL TRENDING CPD HUB

Follow us:

Search Articles:Advanced Search
Click a Company: