You are currently viewing our desktop site, do you want to visit our Mobile web app instead?
 Registered users can save articles to their personal articles list. Login here or sign up here

Did Steinhoff’s CFO jump ship, or was he pushed?

Surely all hands should be on deck?

Steinhoff recently issued a terse statement: “Philip Dieperink will step down, by mutual consent, from both his membership of the Management Board of Steinhoff and as CFO on 31 August 2019 after the 2019 AGM. Following a handover period, he will leave the Steinhoff Group on 31 December 2019. Philip will be succeeded as CFO by Theodore de Klerk, currently Operations Director and member of the Management Board.”

For the CFO to be stepping down in the midst of Steinhoff fighting for its survival is a surprise indeed.

Dieperink’s early career

Dieperink (BCom (Hons), CTA, CA(SA), H Dip Tax), joined Deloitte & Touche in 1980, and transferred to the tax division, specialising in corporate and international tax planning. He was made partner in 1987.

In the interests of transparency, in the 1980s I served a couple of years in the Arthur Young (Ernst & Young) tax department, and joined the Deloitte tax department in 1988. The relationship between me and the various tax partners was one of mutual dislike.

Those were the heady days of tax planning – plantation schemes, film schemes, horse breeding schemes, arbitraging the financial and commercial rand, investing offshore via complex opaque structures to hide the tainted origin of South Africa, establishing offshore ‘blind’ trusts, setting up corporate structures to enable wealthy South Africans to transfer money offshore via a dividend, over-invoicing to get money offshore, offshore slush funds, and transferring intellectual property to foreign domiciled companies (usually in a tax haven).

This was the era before South Africa introduced worldwide taxation, and it was heaven for taxation cowboys. It was the era of junk bonds and leveraged buyouts. This was also an era that presented an opportunity to be schooled in basic tax avoidance 101.

I am not saying that Dieperink (nor Deloitte/Ernst & Young) were involved in any nefarious tax planning on behalf of clients, I am merely painting a picture of the tax environment at the time. When I joined the South African Revenue Service (Sars) in 1996, I uncovered mind-blowing tax schemes I did not know existed (as mentioned, I had learnt the basic tools of tax avoidance) – and this hardwired me for the next 20 years.

Joining Steinhoff

Dieperink briefly joined Murray & Roberts in 1996 (as international financial manager and group tax advisor), and moved to Unitrans in 1997 as financial director. The Steinhoff Group purchased Unitrans in 2007. Dieperink relocated to the United Kingdom to assume the position of chief financial officer of Steinhoff UK Holdings Limited. He also served on the board of directors of Steinhoff Asia Pacific Limited and Cofel. He was appointed as chief financial officer (CFO) and member of the management board of Steinhoff International Holdings NV (Steinhoff) on April 20, 2018, for a period of four years, and as non-executive Director of Steinhoff Africa Retail Limited on July 30, 2018. 

De Klerk

Theodore de Klerk (BCom (Hons), CTA, H Dip Tax, CFM) joined Steinhoff in 2003. He was CEO of SteinBuild from 2008 to 2015. He currently serves as a director of several Steinhoff operating companies, manages a number of strategic projects on behalf of Steinhoff, and is a non-executive director of KAP Industrial Holdings Limited.

Steinhoff’s risks

Steinhoff’s biggest risks are its debt levels, cash management, ongoing litigation, and its uncertain tax position, referred to by Steinhoff in its 2018 annual report as the unforeseen tax liabilities.

These would include:

  • Transactions that substantially inflated the profit and asset values of the group;
  • Complex/fictitious/irregular transactions;
  • Tax implications arising from accounting irregularities;
  • Tax implications arising from the country voluntary arrangements (CVAs);
  • Possible transfer pricing transgressions; and
  • Possible tax avoidance (although legal, could be subject to penalties) or tax evasion schemes (criminal).

Tax risks straddle accounting, operational, financial and legal risk, and this surely requires specialist skills.

At this stage the uncertain tax liability could be the torpedo that ultimately sinks the ship.

Taking into consideration Steinhoff’s precarious tax position, and the possible financial ramifications, surely all hands should be on deck?

Dieperink is an international tax expert, with vast in-depth experience of the financial workings of the group. He has the skills and experience to navigate the financial and tax risks to the group, as well as give guidance in unravelling the complex structures put in place by former Steinhoff International CEO Markus Jooste and his cohorts. Will De Klerk, at age 49, not be somewhat stretched at taking on this weighty challenge?

Steinhoff’s Sens statement is inadequate, uninformative, and gives rise to many questions and negative connotations. Dieperink was appointed to the management board of Steinhoff until 2022. Stepping down “by mutual consent” doesn’t cut it. Then again, this is Steinhoff. Have no expectations …

The author holds shares in Steinhoff

Get access to Moneyweb's financial intelligence and support quality journalism for only
R63/month or R630/year.
Sign up here, cancel at any time.

AUTHOR PROFILE

COMMENTS   8

To comment, you must be registered and logged in.

LOGIN HERE

Don't have an account?
Sign up for FREE

Why would tax be such a big risk for Stenhoff? You have to make profit before you can pay corporate tax.

One of the schemes was to make money out of tax as well – that is why the Steinhoff tax rate was so low – Remember Jooste was also a scholar at SARS! And all the clever directors did not pick it up! Competency was non-existing but all believed Jooste included clever van Zyl from Sanlam

This could have been a good article. Surely moneyweb could have reached out to some exemployees to assess if he was difficult to work with or possibly implicated , or any other reason thsn just a question any person could ask.

Every single thing about Steinhoff seems to carry the odour of sleaze.
Its not just confined to Jooste and LeGrange.

Dieperink was CFO of Steinhoff UK and a director at Steinhoff UK Group Property at the time of the UK property deals with Formal Investments/Malcolm King. I am not saying that he was involved, but he must have known of the transactions and they are almost certainly in the full PwC report (that is not being available to shareholders or the public).
Just Steinhoff taking an opportune moment to further clear the decks.

Load All 8 Comments
End of comments.

LATEST CURRENCIES  

USD / ZAR
GBP / ZAR
EUR / ZAR

Podcasts

SHOP NEWSLETTERS TRENDING CPD HUB

Follow us:

Search Articles:Advanced Search
Click a Company: