You are currently viewing our desktop site, do you want to download our app instead?
Moneyweb Android App Moneyweb iOS App Moneyweb Mobile Web App

NEW SENS search and JSE share prices

More about the app

Sisulu didn’t criticise the judiciary, she insulted it

By accident or design?
Is Lindiwe Sisulu trying to delegitimise the judiciary so it will be less able to hold those responsible for state capture to account, asks the author (2017 file photo). Image: GCIS

In addressing the media in response to an article by Minister of Tourism Lindiwe Sisulu published last Friday (January 7), Acting Chief Justice Raymond Zondo made it clear that the judiciary has never said that it should not be criticised and its members accept that they may be criticised.

However, Zondo said the criticism should be fair and factual.

He emphasised that Sisulu’s attack was not criticism, but “an insult to the justices of the Constitutional Court, the Supreme Court of Appeal, Judges President and Heads of the Superior Courts, and all the African judges who serve their country with distinction and determination to uphold the Constitution”.

Zondo said an important aspect of Sisulu’s article is that it is “rich in insults but poor in substantiation and any analysis … it does not refer to any judgments that have been analysed to justify her conclusions”.

Insults

Zondo recounted some of Sisulu’s more egregious insults: “Indigenous Law has been reduced to a footnote” in law books, and the judiciary “is happy to lick the spittle of those who claim superiority”. Sisulu also referred to the judiciary as “mentally colonised Africans”.

Sisulu’s insults are “most regrettable … I would have expected at least that she would have had some facts to back up what she is saying”.

Zondo added that if Sisulu had some (substantiating) facts she would have included them.

He remarked that it is not acceptable in a constitutional democracy such as South Africa’s that a senior member of parliament and the executive could wake up one morning and decide to write an article insulting all judges, including all African judges. “It should not be acceptable,” he said.

“It is very important that we draw the line between what is acceptable and what is not acceptable.

“We have done more than others to do our job. We have taken the oath that guides our work. We took this oath seriously. We will continue to do our work in accordance with our oath.”

Guardians of the Constitution

In delivering the keynote address on the country’s fourth Judiciary Day on December 14, Zondo mentioned that the courts had done well as guardians of the Constitution, and that this “has sometimes attracted serious attacks against the judiciary”.

“Over the past 25 years there have been storms that the judiciary has gone through but it has managed to continue to play its role to protect and uphold the Constitution and the rights contained in the Bill of Rights.”

He added that despite not knowing what the next 25 years will hold: “Courts and the judiciary must continue to protect our constitutional democracy for the next 25 years and beyond.”

Zondo quoted former president Nelson Mandela who, on inaugurating the Constitutional Court on February 14, 1995, said:

“The last time I appeared in court was to hear whether or not I was going to be sentenced to death. Fortunately for myself and my colleagues we were not. Today I rise not as an accused but, on behalf of the people of South Africa, to inaugurate a court South Africa has never had, a court on which hinges the future of our democracy.”

Zondo said it is up to the arms of state to deal with Sisulu’s unwarranted attack on the judiciary, and advised the judiciary to “continue to do your work in accordance with your office no matter what”.

“Our judgments will speak for us,” he said.

The timing – by accident or design?

Sisulu’s attack comes at an importune time as just days prior, on Tuesday January 4, the first part of the Judicial Commission of Enquiry into State Capture report was released – revealing the Zondo Commission’s findings and recommendations resulting from three years of holding hearings, carrying out investigations, and gathering evidence.

It appears that she is attacking those who will be holding the corrupt accountable.

Is she trying to delegitimise and destabilise the judiciary so that it will be less able to hold those responsible for state capture to account for their crimes?

Was Sisulu’s onslaught part of an organised campaign to attack the judiciary; to attack its raison d’être?

Last Wednesday, just two days before her article was published, someone physically attacked the judiciary by smashing the windows of the Constitutional Court.

Either way, when a senior member of parliament and a member of the executive council attacks and insults the upholders of the law and the Constitution, one could be forgiven for seeing this saga through the image of a snake eating its own tail.

Read:

AUTHOR PROFILE

VIDEOS

COMMENTS   4

Sort by:
  • Oldest first
  • Newest first
  • Top voted

You must be signed in and an Insider Gold subscriber to comment.

SUBSCRIBE NOW SIGN IN

Another utterly useless, self serving narcissistic politician trying to hug the limelight with warped logic, baseless accusations, but a clear political agenda.
ASB, attention seeking behaviour.
Ignore.

Here’s my edited version:

It gets more and more bizarre in SA with a State minister, one of the elite ANC cadres going to the most extreme off-piste slopes of the downward plummeting ANC with a most confused and contradictory article, which in any modern government would have her out the door tout suite.

But considering that her “special advisors” Menzi Simelane and Mo Shaik are currently earning R1 978 533 per annum and her Ministerial Office staff remuneration stands in excess of R13.9 million per year it would seem that the Minister is doing her best to drag people, especially F&F – Friends & Family out of poverty.

If she is the best the Zupta faction come up with for the December congress, Cyril can carry on sleeping.

How popular would she be in Womens League after she ran against [Nkosazana Dlamini-Zuma]?

“When plunder becomes a way of life for a group of men in a society, over the course of time they create for themselves a legal system that authorizes it and a moral code that glorifies it.” – Frederic Bastiat

BEE and cadre deployment represents the moral code that glorifies it. Now she is trying to manufacture the legal system that authorizes it.

End of comments.

LATEST CURRENCIES  

USD / ZAR
GBP / ZAR
EUR / ZAR
BTC / USD

Podcasts

INSIDER SUBSCRIPTION APP VIDEOS RADIO / LISTEN LIVE SHOP OFFERS WEBINARS NEWSLETTERS TRENDING

Follow us:

Search Articles:
Click a Company: