You are currently viewing our desktop site, do you want to download our app instead?
Moneyweb Android App Moneyweb iOS App Moneyweb Mobile Web App
Join our mailing list to receive top business news every weekday morning.

Land Reform: The year that was, as we look ahead to 2019

The government needs to clearly articulate the process of land reform to ensure its successful implementation in the coming year.
As parliament moves forward with expropriation without compensation, it is important to pay attention to the challenges of land reform. Picture: Shutterstock

In 2017 South Africa heard for the first time that the ANC had taken a stand to consider amending Section 25 of the Constitution to allow for the expropriation of land without compensation. Since the landmark announcement at the ruling party’s 54th national policy conference, land reform has dominated public conversation in 2018. Throughout the year, the conversation on land reform became a national talking point, even making it to the Google’s most popular word of the year.

The Joint Constitutional Review Committee’s adoption of the recommendation to Parliament that Section 25 be amended was followed by an urgent interdict by lobby group AfriForum to halt the debate on land reform in the National Assembly, which was subsequently dismissed in the High Court. A date has not yet been set to hear AfriForum’s second case centred on the public participation process. As expected, the ANC and the EFF voted in favour of the adoption of the committee’s report. Although the report states that Parliament must table, process and pass a constitutional amendment bill before the end of the fifth democratic parliament (our current parliament), it is highly unlikely that the Expropriation Bill will be finalised next year. Furthermore, Parliament’s traditionally busy schedule at the beginning of the year makes it implausible for the lengthy process of adopting a bill, which includes among other conditions another public participation process, to be concluded before the country’s national general elections in 2019. So, as we look ahead, land reform will undoubtedly take centre stage in the run-up to 2019 elections.

Debates about changing the constitution were received with criticism and some argued that expropriation of land without compensation (EWC) would erode property rights, which are the foundation of individual liberty; if property rights collapse, so will the economy. Today we are faced with the reality of the decision that the ruling party has taken to proceed with amending Section 25 of the Constitution to allow for EWC. Several warnings have been raised around the impact this will have on the economy and job creation.

Amid concerns raised by the South African business community about the possible impact on investment in our current economic environment of negative economic growth, job shedding in key sectors like agriculture, depreciation of the rand and the country’s relegation to sub investment grade by ratings agencies, international investors have called for the South African government to provide greater clarity on its land reform plans.

The cost implications of this process must be clearly articulated. It is estimated that government would need the equivalent of at least double the annual gross domestic product (GDP) to implement a satisfactory land resettlement programme based on expropriation without compensation at this point. It may help the government to phase the process in a way that is affordable as the expectations created might lead to negativity, anarchy and even ghost settlements; it would be prudent to provide a financial plan on how exactly this process will work.

From our current position on the issue, it may be worthwhile to begin to shift our focus and look at what can be done to ensure that the process is seamless, progressive, and achieves the outcomes it seeks to achieve in the face of naysayers. From where we stand, our reality as a country is that expropriation without compensation will proceed; how it’s done will make or break the country and government must clearly articulate this and guide the process to enable a progressive process going forward.

A number of questions have been posed by agricultural economists and researchers alike about how expropriation without compensation will be implemented, such as:

  • How will the law cater for the assets on a farm and improvements made on the land?
  • If compensation is due for farm assets and not just for the land itself, then would it be prudent for the government to pay more to compensate farmers for improvements to the land in order to obtain the actual value of the land?
  • Will there be compensation to banks, which are often times de facto partial owners of land through farmers’ debt? 

Other questions worth asking include:

  • How do we urgently address the current problems facing land reform
  • How do we select land reform beneficiaries and what are they eligible to get
  • How will beneficiaries of land reform be supported to ensure productive use of land?
  • How do we make it possible for churches, mines, banks, SOEs etc to donate land for land reform purposes
  • Does the country have enough resources, expertise and capacity to support beneficiaries of land reform without the support of the farmers who may be displaced?
  • How will the government ensure that land reform lead towards poverty reduction for the millions of South Africans who live in extreme poverty?
  • How will we expand reform in urban and rural areas be addressed?

As parliament moves forward with EWC, it is important that we don’t turn a blind eye to the challenges of land reform. In fact, we must look at the government’s target to redistribute 30% of the land by 2030 while we seek to understand why only 8% of the target has been reached and, even more importantly, why a significant portion of this redistributed 8% has been unsuccessful. We must address these challenges as we seek to move forward to make land reform a success in South Africa. If we decide to look past these issues, this process is bound to backfire spectacularly. 

Looking at the country’s not so impressive track record with previous efforts to redistribute land, partnerships will without a doubt be crucial to help drive a more progressive process. Both the public and private sectors must delve deeper into how partnerships can be cultivated without tensions to enable a more successful land reform process. For its sins, Vumelana Advisory Fund has been assisting beneficiaries of land reform to establish commercially viable partnerships between investors and the communities with a focus on creating jobs, skills and income with some measure of success. It is important that we refrain from re-inventing the wheel. Let us rather use the lessons learnt over the years and built on this to address the current challenges and fast track sustainable land reform. In doing so, we must not forget the wounds borne by all South Africans because of the land issue, if we forget, we will not heal or succeed. The process must address not only the land issue, but also the past and present psychosocial scars that the issue of land has left behind.

Whatever we do, all South Africans must guard against expropriation without compensation only benefitting the greedy appetites of the chosen few and ensure that the process will not be sacrificed at the altar of political expediency.

Peter Setou is the Chief Executive of the Vumelana Advisory Fund

Get access to Moneyweb's financial intelligence and support quality journalism for only
R63/month or R630/year.
Sign up here, cancel at any time.


Sort by:
  • Oldest first
  • Newest first
  • Top voted

You must be signed in to comment.


The inexorable drum beat to join the rest of Africa !! Poverty, hunger, famine and wars – Lovely continent it no?

So true. We are all much poorer this year. Inflation up,gdp flat, gdp per capita down, jse a bad joke, rand worse, EWC, eskom,saa, sabc,vbs bank, ramaphoria dead,zuma,supra and markus still free. A true banana Republic.

Excellent question: “will the government ensure that land reform lead towards poverty reduction for the millions of South Africans who live in extreme poverty?” And the answer is “no”. And it will result in alleviating only “the greedy appetites of the chosen few”. Just look at Zim to see how many politicians and government officials suddenly became “land owners” and at what happened to the livelihood of ordinary Zimbabweans.

How can the past ever be more important than the present?

Every culture has it’s dreams that are entrenched in their DNA. You get the American dream, for example. In Africa it’s the African dream: often it’s about sitting in peace at your hut, having beer with your friends, while the kids are tending your cattle and the wife(s?) making pap. Just like the American dream of riding with your horse into the sunset or from going from zero to hero is just, well, a dream. So is the African dream. Things will never be as they were. Farming is mega business with mega money going into the soil and making/losing mega money.

There’s no possibility, at all, of ever making a quiet, peaceful, day-to-day living with a few cattle when you have school fees to pay and things to buy from the shops.

What people need is jobs, not land, so they can buy what they need. And for those who can make a bit of money and later decide to follow their hearts and buy a small piece of land where they will have a few cattle and a good wife and nice friends to chat with over a beer in the shade – good for them. The rest just need jobs.

Thanks JapieM. A refreshing bit of common sense. It seems to be in short supply these days.

It will soon be revealed if this is a white removal scheme. If so then as a farmer who produces food for the nation I will lay a curse of famine and poverty on the ANC.

Is this the start of many… repeat of history?

The majority of whites do not own much land, perhaps a residential stand.

In fact some skilled citizens (of all races) are abandoning their homes to take up positions in foreign countries. They have chosen to vote with their feet. Life has become less risky and more pleasant away from these shores. Our economy will never grow if the brain drain continues.

My advice to the government is to stay aware from commercially productive farms. Better make sure that dispossessed individuals are not left destitute. This will really chase away any goodwill there remains towards this country.

Travel along roads leaving Cape Town. Grape farms, and others, are the ones wanted by a next generation of give it a try. Sailing under the ticket of entrepreneur. Doing that require guts. Failing will make one thing sure, the land will be never again farmland. Just home for fijnbos. The original state a VOC found it. Contrary to popular belief they discovered farms in waiting.

Not often that you see ´government´and ´successful implementation´ in the same sentence… at least not in SA.

The “questions” are bizarre. How can it be contemplated that land with a legal title deed, bought and paid for (from a white person), owned thus for three generations, faithfully paying their rates and taxes, can now simply be taken away and given to some other person. The theme of restitution of land taken later than 1913 has now been forgotten or expediently abandoned it seems. This is simple, sly theft, targeting individual white farmers who, I surmise, Cyril etc reckon cannot defend themselves the way corporations can, all for the benefit of the ANC. Shades of Zim and Venezuela by stealth; thieving scum.

I stick my neck out and predict that little will come of land reform. The ANC stole the only policy the EFF had, with some justification.

At the last election 11 million people voted. 13 million people, mostly young black people, eligible to vote, did not vote. The ANC and the black elite are scared to death if the 13 million non-voters will be woken up by the likes of the EFF and others, hence the playing around with land reform.

It is a measure of how low our politics have sunk when our politicians run on a ticket of stealing other people’s property.

End of comments.





Follow us:

Search Articles:Advanced Search
Click a Company: