You are currently viewing our desktop site, do you want to visit our Mobile web app instead?
 Registered users can save articles to their personal articles list. Login here or sign up here

Why are there so many uninsured South Africans?

South Africa’s insurance gap may be as high as R30trn.

South Africans are grossly underinsured. In fact, some pundits calculate the insurance gap to be as high as R30 trillion. There are debatable ways of determining this gap, and whether or not this quoted figure is higher than reality, we can safely conclude that the real gap is BIG.

Since the announcement of the MTN and Sanlam insurance partnership, some commentators have highlighted this gap again; and specifically, note that black South Africans are more underinsured than other demographics. These same commentators propose that there are three primary causes of this exaggerated gap:

  1. Lack of easy access to insurance products
  2. Lack of disposable income
  3. Lack of insurance culture in South Africa and the rest of the continent

It’s worth unpacking these proposed causes to see how accurate they are and what can be done about it. Let’s begin with the disposable income argument.

Lack of disposable income

In order for this to be plausible, the following conflicting statements would need to be true at the same time:

  1. Black South Africans have enough disposable income to buy funeral cover (which is in high demand and sold in significant volumes countrywide)
  2. Black South Africans do not have enough disposable income to buy life insurance 

I will concede that funeral cover is not the same thing as life insurance. First and foremost, they are designed to do two very different jobs. Funeral cover is designed to pay out cash very quickly following a death in order to assist with funeral and related expenses. Life insurance will often take a lot longer to pay out and is designed for legacy purposes such as settling debt, leaving behind financial security for loved ones and handling estate taxes and expenses. Life insurance cover amounts are typically multiple times higher than funeral cover, and the buying process is more complex and often involves some level of medical and occupational underwriting. 

However, if we’re making the argument around affordability, life insurance is often significantly cheaper than funeral cover when comparing how much cover R1 of premium will buy. At the extremes, an individual may be able to get as much as 15 times more life cover for the same premium as funeral cover.

Bottom line: if there is disposable income for funeral cover (and we know there is), there is disposable income for life insurance. After all, some life insurance has a baked-in benefit which pays a portion of the cover as quickly as funeral cover would pay – effectively killing two birds with one stone.

Lack of insurance culture 

The cultural argument is much more interesting. Our research suggests that in many cases, extended family and community are expected to (and often do) step in to take care of left-behind children and loved ones when a breadwinner passes away. If this is the case, the need for life insurance to help secure the financial futures of left behind family may be less compelling in black communities. 

That being said, debt (like home and car loans) remains one of the primary drivers of life insurance demand. This is culture and race agnostic. I also believe that even in the case of the community and extended family stepping in to take care of orphaned children, there is certainly still a case for money to be left behind to support them. 

In general, if the industry did a better job of educating people about the needs and benefits of life insurance, then cultural differences would be less obvious when measuring demand for their products.

Lack of access

This is, in my opinion, the most important reason for the insurance gap and, in particular, for black South Africans.

There are a number of drivers behind a historical lack of access to life insurance, but one of the most prominent is the nature of the traditional life insurance distribution model itself. Since the dawn of South Africa’s life insurance industry over 100 years ago, products have been distributed predominantly through face-to-face methods – via financial advisors and brokers.

The financial advice process starts by assessing a client’s needs, before putting together a financial plan and recommendations. After identifying a need for life insurance, the intermediary attempts to match that need with a recommended product. Should the client purchase a product, the intermediary is rewarded with commission, which is tied directly to the size of the premium written.

Over time, as more regulation was steadily introduced (primarily aimed at client protection), the compliance burden of being a financial advisor increased. Not only do top financial advisors require years of training and demonstrable competence, but each individual piece of advice dispensed is subject to rigorous compliances processes. Essentially, this compliance requirement, as well as the time invested in an individual client’s financial plan and product recommendations, means that an individual policy sale will take many hours of an advisor’s time and effort.

Given that time is a finite resource, and the effort involved in selling a small life insurance policy is generally similar to selling a large one, it is rational for financial advisors to invest their efforts in the segment of the market where the largest life insurance policies are needed; and hence where they are likely to earn the most remuneration for the time invested (remember, their commission is tied to premium size). All things being equal, this means a focus on higher-income earners and older clients. 

Due to historical factors, we know that the average income of individuals in South Africa is skewed by race, so it’s no surprise that black South Africans are generally underserved by traditional distribution channels compared to other demographic groups.

Peter Castleden is the CEO of Sanlam Indie.

Get access to Moneyweb's financial intelligence and support quality journalism for only
R63/month or R630/year.
Sign up here, cancel at any time.

COMMENTS   18

To comment, you must be registered and logged in.

LOGIN HERE

Don't have an account?
Sign up for FREE

For some people having a fancy funeral is much more important than having money for old age.

Sanlam at their last shareholders meeting said that South Africa had a high market penetration which was impacting on growth. Why does this article above gloss over that point? Why was Sanlam stating that if it were not true?

The principal reason for companies to offer life insurance is to make profits for shareholders, not to provide cash for the families of those departed. It is better to self insure, i.e. save, than to hand over rands every month for the rest of one’s life. That’s why insurance companies thrive at the expense of policy holders.

Insurance is a lifelong scam, how many people are insured for millions of rands the with the unemployment crisis in the country thouse policies lapse, and insurance companies sell them to other investors and continue to make money. I am yet to see someone’s family being paid R5m when his insured parents die… Always a repudiation of the claim. You even struggle to get the R70K for a funeral policy…

“Always a repudiation.”
That is just a blatant lie.

“What is risk and insurance?”. HOw do you not even understand the basics?

There’s no correlation between that insurance gap and GDP per capita?Surely it’s to the insurers advantage for the gap to be filled,but having a signifact portion of your income going to insurance doesn’t add to wealth creation especially in a south African context with high gini coefficient levels.i.e insurance is oversold and usually with higher than inflation annual escalations that in some cases overlap real income.
In any case,insurance demand is going to weaken in decades to come.Cars will be self driving,Parallel innovation will emerge in the life insurance space for people to live healthier and longer.

Too many irresponsible adults out there who think a lack of insurance is a ‘call option’ on others in the event of an accident i.e. if it’s my fault I can’t pay as I have no insurance and if its your fault I may get a better car. I say this because this has happened to me a couple of times. Third party insurance should be compulsory for all vehicle owners.

Quite right. South Africans have a parasitic mindset. I won’t go into specifics – there are plenty of examples in the news right now.

It’s mostly about affordability

That’s the same excuse the loyal South Africans in Soweto say when it comes to rates, electricity, e-tolls etc. while flashing around their fancy smartphones and Barcelona t-shirts. If you cannot pay for it you cannot get it and as a result more people will get off their backsides and work for it instead of expecting everything for free in return for an ANC vote.

Try googling “road accident fund legal costs”. Nothing seems to come up. Must be a well kept secret,

“Must be a well kept secret.”

Not really – it’s all laid out in the RAF’s annual reports, which you can find on their website. Amazing what Google can do once you learn how Google works.

RAF’s total legal (and expert) expenses for 2017/18 was R8,8bn.

yip and whole R8.8billion is a massive waste of money because they settle 99% of cases on the day of the court trial instead of when claim form is handed in. And I bet the amounts paid out was less than R8b. But its tax money so they feel nothing and their buddy RAF lawyers get rich.

Imagine being this bad at finding information in the information age.

I am sick and tired of those dam out-surance, clientele life, 1 life adverts on tv everyday on every programme! Please give us a break with these annoying adverts.

Load All 18 Comments
End of comments.

LATEST CURRENCIES  

USD / ZAR
GBP / ZAR
EUR / ZAR

Podcasts

SHOP NEWSLETTERS TRENDING CPD HUB

Follow us:

Search Articles:Advanced Search
Click a Company: