You are currently viewing our desktop site, do you want to download our app instead?
Moneyweb Android App Moneyweb iOS App Moneyweb Mobile Web App

NEW SENS search and JSE share prices

More about the app

The tempting, not-so-simple matter of working remotely, internationally

People are becoming used to working wherever they are – but doing so could trigger a cascade of tax and immigration implications.
Packing one’s bags and carrying on as normal could result in problems for the individual and their employer. Image: Lucas Jackson/Reuters

Remote work has become the norm for many employees and professionals. Along with the growth of the ‘gig’ economy, which surged during the Covid-19 pandemic, the most remarkable change is the flexibility and mobility of remote-working employees who can crisscross the country and cross global borders without taking a day’s leave.

Read: Remote workers flee to $70 000-a-month resorts while awaiting vaccines

While it’s now entirely possible for employees and independent contractors to remain productive while travelling across international borders, this trend may be problematic from a tax and immigration law perspective.

Flexibility to fly – but not so fast

There is no doubt that the benefits of remote working include flexibility. One can work from home, a coffee shop, another province or even across borders.

Certain trends include employees who travel to foreign countries for personal reasons such as a holiday or to visit family, and decide to extend their stay and work remotely.

Others with citizenship or permanent residency in another country may decide to travel between SA and the foreign country and perform their employment duties wherever they find themselves.

However, employees and their employers may be blissfully unaware of the fact that there are several serious tax and immigration implications of working in foreign jurisdictions.

Tax warnings to heed

Personal taxes: Where a tax resident of one country performs income-generating activities in another jurisdiction, one must consider the principles of international taxation. Generally, where a person physically performs employment duties in another country for extended periods (more than six months in a 12-month period), both that country and their country of residence will have a right to tax that income, resulting in double taxation. Extended presence may also trigger tax residency in the foreign country, further complicating the individual’s tax obligations considerably.

Corporate taxes: Beyond the individual tax implications, employees may create complications for their employer as well. Depending on the nature of the activities conducted by the employee and their designation, they may create a taxable presence for their employer in the foreign country, potentially dragging a portion of the company’s profits into the foreign country’s tax net.

Tax Consulting SA’s master mobility specialist Tanya Tosen says that in some cases it is advisable for SA employers to reconsider the individual’s contract if they are working abroad.

Consider your options

“Where the employee intends to remain in the foreign country for an extended period, it may be advisable to terminate the individual’s permanent employment contract and renegotiate their services as an independent contractor,” says Tosen. “Provided the substance of the relationship supports this, it severs the link between the employer and the employee, therefore shifting the tax liability from the employer to the individual.”

Independent contractors working abroad would also have to consider the following:

  • Their rate of taxation;
  • Their tax implications while still working for an SA-based firm; and
  • Whether they still meet the tax residency test, making them liable for tax in SA and in the foreign country.

Remote working may be illegal

Tosen warns that immigration rules must be strictly adhered to. She suggests investigating the country’s restrictions on the right to work while visiting.

Where you are present in another country on a visitor’s visa, you are generally not permitted to work in that country.

Where you remotely perform your South African employment duties in that country, you are in contravention of the terms of your visa.

Corporate reputational damage

Again, these implications extend beyond the individual.

Businesses are at risk of suffering serious reputational damage if employees opt to work remotely abroad without understanding and complying with all the tax and immigration rules.

If, for example, you choose to relocate to the United Kingdom, Portugal, or Switzerland, but do not possess permanent residency or a work visa that allows you to work in your new temporary home country, you are falling foul to the country’s laws and working illegally, albeit for an SA firm.

This can create serious brand damage for the business, which may find its expansion plans in that country hampered if a foreign government holds the incursion against it when making future decisions.

Seek professional advice

It’s absolutely vital that businesses and employees seek professional advice when navigating this new territory of remote working across international borders. While we are now more flexible than ever, the decision to work in a foreign country remains one of considerable gravity, as it triggers a cascade of tax and immigration implications.

Jean Du Toit is head of tax technical at Tax Consulting South Africa.


Sort by:
  • Oldest first
  • Newest first
  • Top voted

You must be signed in to comment.


And now a list of countries that don’t have these draconian type of laws. We want to move from an old-world country/state tax system to the new world of sovereign individuals please.

I love these articles from the following viewpoints.

One, the fearmongering especially to the companies, i.e. your employee is working in another country and as a director I must have a sleepless night that some either local or foreign jurisdiction will come after the company and it’s profits and then further to worry about “brand damage” in a foreign country. If this employee is smart enough to do all of this then he must take responsibility for all of this.

Secondly this all seems so theoretical and anecdotal (working in coffee shops……. always sounds so nice). I would like to see how the authorities are going to police this and remote work is a NOT one size fits all issue and largely depends on the industry however even places like apple will still have offices and office workers. To add a complication is having a worker in another country this still has to be tested especially when things get back to normal.

End of comments.





Follow us: