Registered users can save articles to their personal articles list. Login here or sign up here

There’s more to diversification than not having all your eggs in one basket

You need more than eggs – Sasfin Wealth.

Don’t put all your eggs in one basket, the old investment adage goes.

And while the importance of diversification cannot be stressed enough, mere diversification is not enough.

“The old cliché is don’t have all your eggs in one basket, but you also need to understand that you can’t only have eggs,” Philip Bradford, head of investments at Sasfin Wealth, says.

What Bradford is referring to is the importance of understanding the interplay between various asset classes in a multi-asset portfolio. Although investors ideally want to ensure that all the building blocks in their portfolio do well in the long run, they don’t want to be in a position where all assets are struggling at the same time.

A classic example is bonds and equities. Over time, investors tend to find that when equities are not doing well, bonds outperform, Bradford says.

Conventional wisdom dictates that equities will outperform other asset classes in the long run. As a result, the assumption is often that equities are the only asset class investors should utilise.

But history doesn’t necessarily support this assumption, Bradford says.

While South Africa has been the best performing stock market in the world over the last 100 years, there are other asset classes that have also done very well in rand terms.

Bradford says a lot of investors argue that they would have been in a more favourable position had they gone offshore 30 years ago, yet in many instances investors would have been better off investing in rand assets. Even though the rand depreciated from about R2 to R12 against the dollar over the period, high-yielding local assets like cash and bonds have still done better than some of the equivalent foreign asset classes. As an example, over the last 20 years SA bonds have comfortably outperformed global stocks by nearly 1% per year on average, including the depreciation of the rand.

Currently, local cash and bonds provide investors with a significant pickup over global cash and bonds and it makes sense to get a strong “base load” return from these assets that are already comfortably beating inflation, Bradford argues.

“In the local market, if you can currently get inflation plus 4% or 5% out of bonds – which are actually going to protect you when the equity market falls – what it does allow you to do is to dynamically move between those asset classes when equities underperform. Bonds are essentially like an insurance policy that instead pays you a premium.”

If equities pull back, other assets may still be doing well and the portfolio can be rebalanced.

“Simple strategies like regular rebalancing actually add a lot of value in the long run.”

It also allows investors to invest “more opportunistically” into equities.

“I wouldn’t say that the right asset allocation is to be in equities and then when things look bad go into cash or bonds. If anything, there is a very strong argument over the longer term that your fixed income assets (particularly the local ones) can give you compounding growth because they are currently – literally by the nature of the instrument – offering decent real returns with a high degree of certainty.”

Although the tide seems to have turned for the South African economy, this does not necessarily mean the local stock market will do well. These developments are discounted quite quickly. Moreover, many locally-listed companies earn the majority of their earnings offshore, Bradford says.

An improved economic outlook may well support local retailers as well as banks and insurers that are sensitive to interest rate movements, but there are probably only a handful of local stocks that could be considered world class, he adds.

“When you are looking at equities I think you do need to look at things with very much a global mindset and be aware that the vagaries and movements of currency markets will impact those returns, but over time I do believe there are opportunities out there that you can’t get on your doorstep in South Africa.”

Bradford says for local investors looking to increase offshore exposure it makes sense to focus on equities, simply because investors are taking a lot of currency risk.

“The argument for going offshore and investing in cash or bonds for me is a very weak one, particularly at these sorts of levels and the kind of yields that are available.”

“I don’t think most people appreciate the currency risk they are taking. They feel safer by taking the money offshore but because they are getting a much lower yield on their [cash and bond] investments offshore it isn’t typically compensating them for the additional risk that they are taking.”

“If you took R100 and bought US Dollars 30 years ago, it would now be worth R1 769 (including interest and rand depreciation). However if you kept it in cash in rands it would now be worth R2 448. Basically the higher interest rates in SA more than compensated you for any currency risk.”

In contrast, global equities offer a similar valuation to local equities and far greater range of higher quality companies to choose from, he argues.

However, other local asset classes like fixed income and local property offer very high yields compared to the global market. Local property offers a very high rental yield because the escalations in leases are linked to inflation and are much higher than in developed markets.

“So whether you are a retail investor or an institutional investor, the local assets that are available to you can give you high yields that you can’t get in the developed market.”

Bradford says a lot of private investors tend to include only equity and cash-type investments in their portfolios, ignoring assets like bonds. 

“But actually, it is those in-between investments than can often add your best bang for buck from a risk-adjusted perspective and can seriously improve your returns over time.”

While local pension fund portfolios tend to have a higher equity exposure than their global counterparts – a strategy that has worked well over time – it will likely become increasingly difficult to achieve the inflation-plus type targets investors have become accustomed to in the past.

“I think we need to be a lot more cognisant of not necessarily trying to beat the market – or active versus passive – but try and get the best risk-adjusted return we can for our investors.”

Brought to you by Sasfin Wealth.

Get access to Moneyweb's financial intelligence and support quality journalism for only
R63/month or R630/year.
Sign up here, cancel at any time.


To comment, you must be registered and logged in.


Don't have an account?
Sign up for FREE

An unbiased, sensible and informative article.
S.A listed property Reits offer a very attractive income yield at very competitive share prices (under valued) presently.

Bonds performed relatively well during 2017, is the best performing asset class over the 1st quarter of 2018, and are still doing rather well during April 2018 – but its continuing performance going forward are very dependable on the Rand / Dollar exchange rate and the performance of global equities.

As the performance of global equity strengthen and the Rand weakens, it will negatively impact on the global demand for S.A. bonds and as such it’s performance. Having some balanced exposure to S.A. listed properties, S.A. listed bonds and S.A. liquid cash investments in addition to a well diversified equity exposure (preferably Rand denominated) will however serve any investor well over the long run.

Interesting piece, this. Diversification is critical – anyone who would have all their assets/wealth in a single asset class, be it equities, would be ill-informed.

The challenge is find have a cost-effective,actively managed multi-asset class solution, like the one Bradford espouses.

Nice work, Moneyweb

“The challenge”- as you so well pointed out, any idea’s /observations from your side would be more than appreciated.

In the example quoted of R 100 invested – are all the calculations based on Rand or are their currency conversions after the 30 year period. Also has inflation been factored into the projected figures. Over the last 30 years the Rand value has been bombarded by inflation and currency devaluation

By all conventional logic my setup would be classed insane by the experts

I have offshore equity currently concentrated in a core portfolio and a speculative portfolio of four other direct equities. I used to own some ETF in the core portfolio but sold earlier this year expecting a slap.

Locally I similarly own four stocks.

I have one RA from when I had to take one out. Dumbest thing ever. Literally half the return of direct

I own no bonds and no listed property. I have some direct exposure to commercial property. The rest is cash waiting for opportunities.

For me, I don’t get how people have the bandwidth to sit and apply proper analysis to a list of 30 investments. I do general research, go long, keep researching, and every four to five years rotate one of my current holdings out to a new “better” candidate

Load All 6 Comments
End of comments.





Follow us:

Search Articles:Advanced Search
Click a Company: