Will your financial advisor be replaced by a machine?

How will they stay relevant?
Technology can be used to analyse and evaluate a huge array of offerings, but human advisors can interact meaningfully with clients. Picture: Shutterstock

In January this year Amazon opened a new store in Seattle in the USA. Called Amazon Go, the store has no checkout counters and no cashiers. Customers simply scan their phones, pick what they would like off the shelf, and walk out.

This is the future of physical retail. Technology is making cashiers redundant.

This replacement of humans is happening across all kinds of sectors, particular in areas like toll booths and fast-food service. However, higher skilled jobs are also not exempt.

Computers can process and analyse all kinds of data far quicker and more accurately than humans can, so many clerical functions can be automated. This is happening in financial services too, where the potential for using artificial intelligence and machine learning is extensive.

In the world of financial advice, robo-advisors are also gaining popularity. They allow people to access advice on their own terms, when they want it, and without feeling that they are exposing themselves and their financial situation to someone else, which is often a real barrier to approaching an advisor.

It is inevitable that this changing environment will change the way that financial advisors operate. But will they, like cashiers, become redundant altogether?

Albert Cucco, the chief client solution officer at fintech provider Objectway, believes that the entire financial services world is facing this challenge. Faced with new entrants offering digital solutions, traditional players have to respond.

He doesn’t however believe that the human element will disappear. Ultimately, there must be a meeting of these two worlds because both will have to adapt to be sustainable.

“Digital players cannot serve online only clients if they want to increase their share of wallet,” says Cucco. “At the same time, if traditional players remain where they are, they will not easily gain new customers.”

The majority of robo-advice platforms are discovering that it is extremely difficult to be profitable offering only this service. They are therefore understanding the need to expand their product offering.

Many traditional players are also appreciating that to grow their market share they have to digitise their businesses, and make far greater use of technology.

“This is the argument for a hybrid approach, where the digital only experience and face-to-face experience will meet in a service that will address the needs of the customer in depth but still with the advisor as the central point in the service,” says Cucco.

Thomas Zink, associate research director at IDC, agrees.

“I am of the firm belief that the hybrid advisor model can support the wealth management business because it allows you to run a lot more efficiently,” Zink says. “It doesn’t seek to replace the relationship manager, but support them.”

Read: Traditional financial advice is no longer enough

One area where there is a lot of room for technology to play a role, for example, is in product selection. If a financial advisor wanted to be truly independent and offer clients advice on every product available, they would need to know thousands of different offerings.

Besides being practically impossible, advisors also have their own biases to consider. It’s extremely difficult to be impartial.

“There is always room for error and personal bias in selecting products, so the advisor is not always acting in the best interests of the customer,” says Zink. “They are more likely to recommend something that they know and can hold their ground on in discussions.”

Technology has the ability both to remove these biases and analyse a full array of products, potentially identifying suitable solutions that the advisor may have missed on their own. Particularly in selecting risk products, this can be hugely beneficial.

“The technology is simplifying the work, not taking it away,” says Lorenzo Pagnin, Objectway’s chief technology officer. “Many advisors work with excel spreadsheets to try to keep track of client information, but now they have automation to do this. This also frees up more time for them to add value.”

In this respect, greater use of technology in the advice process also aligns with the objectives of the Retail Distribution Review (RDR). Advisors who are simply selling products are not only going to find it difficult to survive in the new regulatory environment, but they are going to find themselves outdone by technology too.

The advisor of the future not only has to be able to offer something that the client can’t do for themselves through a digital platform, but also provide meaningful interactions.

“Advisors can provide a lot of digital services directly to the end user,” says Pagnin. “But when it comes to counselling and strategy, then that’s where human interaction is important.”

Patrick Cairns is attending the Objectway OWIN18 conference in Rome. His travel and accommodation were covered by Objectway.



Sort by:
  • Oldest first
  • Newest first
  • Top voted

You must be signed in and an Insider Gold subscriber to comment.


I wonder if we will even have “wealth” once the robots run everything and there are so very few employed to even buy all the things produced by the robots. Our wealth might all get taken away and everyone will get paid an equal universal basic income.

My financial advisor was replaced by a machine years ago, and has been due for scrapping for about as long.

Financial advisors work by rote, ticking off a list, putting you in a convenient slot and your investment is ready to be done.(and charged an amount monthly way over the value of the input) You are done with and forgotten while he is looking at pictures of the new Jag or Val de Vie.A computer may be more sfficient in weighing the variables and inclined to be more trustworthy.

If I throw darts at the lists of different investment possibilities, on average my return will be average of all the returns. How many investment advisers perform below average? They can be replaced not by AI but by a dartboard.

The average machine has more ambition than wanting to become a financial advisor. But, at least machines have no use for moneey so they cannot take lickbacks from product peddlers

Hey guys as a Financial Planner I fully get that there are many, maybe most brokers out there who have given you a terrible experience which ultimately was about their best interests and not yours but trust me there are Planners out there who offer real tangible value. These Planners are not fund pickers and do not earn commission, they are qualified and skilled. Contact the FPI and they would be able to refer someone who can add value.

OK Dirkg, I literally hate financial advisors. I am retired now and see how I have been treated less than fairly. My advice don’t go to financial advisors attached to banks. The don’t know what they are doing. They don’t read round the subject, have never heard of Morningstar, Financial Data or even Moneyweb. They are given a list of preferred unit trusts and are told to discourage any interest in other funds. Don’t try successful (otherwise rich) advisors. Only interested in big investors. The one I had for two years eventually informed me that my portfolio was not big enough for him and passed me on to somebody else who never returned my calls. The other one, who was good in the beginning passed me on to his son, who was learning the business. Why? He did not have enough time to look after me. If he had perhaps I would have become as rich as he was. I shall certainly contact FPI and perhaps hit lucky for once.

Ja, personally, I’d trade mine in for an AI version in a heartbeat. The performance/advice/reviews I’m (not) getting is ridiculous, to say the least. But I was young and naive when I signed the dotted line, and not sure how much penalties it will be to move my RA and other financial stuff… sigh.

Typical financial advisory service would look after investments, long and short term insurance, medical insurance, estate planning, taxes etc. Current robots favour the company that program them. Unless you have a well informed specialist investment advisor the DIY route is still the best option. FA’s over-emphesize the value of counselling linked to client behaviour pattern analysis. With the markets delivering single digit returns there just ain’t enough money to make all the role players happy.

AI will be what unmanaged call centres have been for big business – a total screw up, and a vehicle for customers to leave the business and find an alternative caring business, who understands your requirements and is prepared to find a solution for your particular problem. AI is going to force people into a predetermined mould – if you don’t fit you will be encouraged to just accept their solution, or be beaten until you fit. These robots are designed by computer “specialists” which in itself is a problem as they are out of touch with reality and believe their way is the best. Think of Microsofts launch capabilities in 1975 versus todays versions – humans have moved it along quite significantly, but users have demanded changes not the progammers

End of comments.



Subscribe to our mailing list

* indicates required
Moneyweb newsletters

Instrument Details  

You do not have any portfolios, please create one here.
You do not have an alert portfolio, please create one here.

Follow us:

Search Articles:
Click a Company: