Cogta fails 2019 audit miserably

Hundreds of millions paid to wrong suppliers and ghosts.
The department responsible for rolling out the country’s Covid-19 regulations paid a R183m grant to the wrong recipient; R104m remains irrecoverable. Image: Moneyweb

The Department of Cooperative Governance and Traditional Affairs (Cogta) is responsible for rolling out the Covid-19 regulations in South Africa. As a result, it now has a high profile.

How appalling then, that the Auditor-General (AG) issued a disclaimer of audit opinion on the annual financial statements for the financial year ended March 31, 2019 as he was unable to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence to provide a basis for an audit opinion.

The audit report details a shocking lack of internal controls, non-compliance with legislation, and hundreds of millions of rands lost – including through payments made to wrong suppliers, ghosts, and non-qualifying government employees.

The general poor governance and lack of leadership makes a mockery of Cogta’s vision to be “a functional and developmental local government system that delivers on its constitutional and legislative mandates within a system of cooperative governance”.

Expenditure

  • Irregular expenditure stands at R1.3 billion (2018: R1.9 billion) but this figure could be higher due to lack of audit evidence.
  • Goods and services amounted to R3.6 billion (2018: R3.3 billion). However, accurate and completed timesheets were not provided for payments made to Community Work Programme (CWP) implementing agents. Some material invoices were not provided to justify expenditure, and payments were made to some who were deceased.
  • Moveable tangible capital assets amounted to R227.9 million (2018: R67.9 million). However, there wasn’t sufficient appropriate audit evidence to support expenditure, and not all assets could be traced.
  • Prepayment and advances amounted to R188.7 million. There wasn’t sufficient appropriate audit evidence for prepayments, and advance payments were made to the implementing agents with no invoices to back this up.
  • Accruals and payables not recognised amounted to R147.5 million. The department did not have adequate systems to maintain records of accounts payable for goods and services received but not yet paid for, resulting in accruals being understated by R63.3 million. Further, there was insufficient appropriate audit evidence for the amounts disclosed as accruals.

Other matters

  • Assets under investigation amounted to R13.6 million (2018: R43.1 million). The amount was reduced in 2019 without the auditors being supplied with the appropriate audit evidence to support the reduction.
  • Restatement of corresponding figures: the corresponding figures for March 31, 2018 were restated as a result of errors in the financial statements.

Report on the audit of the annual performance report

The AG is required to report material findings on the reported performance information against predetermined objectives for selected programmes presented in the annual performance report.

The AG selected regional and urban development and legislative support, institutional development, and the CWP, and found that there was a lack of audit evidence to support the reported achievement.

Material findings on compliance

  • Non-compliance with the Public Finance Management Act (PFMA): financial statements were not submitted for auditing within two months after the financial year-end.
  • Non-compliance with the PFMA and the reporting framework: the financial statements submitted for auditing were not prepared in accordance with the prescribed financial reporting framework and the PFMA. Supporting records were not provided.
  • Non-compliance with National Treasury regulations in regard to expenditure management: effective internal controls were not in place for approval and processing of payments, and payments were not made within 30 days or an agreed period after receipt of an invoice.
  • Non-compliance with the PFMA in regard to consequence management: disciplinary steps were not taken against line officials who had either incurred or permitted irregular expenditure.

Significant internal control deficiencies

  • Leadership did not implement proper governance. There was inadequate and insufficient oversight to ensure compliance with key laws and regulations. There weren’t effective action plans to address prior-year findings. Financial and performance reporting was not supported by appropriate audit evidence.
  • Management did not implement proper record-keeping; there were no controls over daily and monthly processing and recording of transactions; regular, accurate and complete financial and performance reports were neither prepared nor supported by reliable information.

Material irregularities identified during the audit

The lack of effective internal controls for the approval and processing of payments will result in material irrecoverable losses:

  • A municipal infrastructure grant of R183.5 million was paid to the wrong recipient. An amount of R104 million remains irrecoverable!

    The matter has been reported to the Special Commercial Crimes Unit of the Directorate for Priority Crime Investigation (the Hawks) and the Special Investigations Unit for further investigation.

  • Payments were made to ghosts (deceased participants in the CWP).
  • Payments were made to non-qualifying government employees on the CWP.
  • Prepayments were made for goods and services that were not received at CWP sites.
  • Project management fees were paid to implementing agents in the CWP for services not received in 2018 and 2019.

A total of R401.7 million (2018: R287.8 million) was paid to consultants, and a total of R2.6 billion (2018: R2.4 billion) was paid to contractors. The total expenditure for the year amounted to R81.9 billion (2018: R76.4 billion).

With the lack of internal controls, poor governance, and illicit payments – to ghosts, to wrong suppliers and for goods not received – exactly how much has funded corruption? How many people, living in abject poverty, have passed away due to the lack of funds?

Cogta has a lot to answer for. Its lack of governance and disregard for the poor should not be swept away by the Covid-19 tide.

The spirit of Batho Pele (‘People First’) has dissipated.

Get access to Moneyweb's financial intelligence and support quality journalism for only
R63/month or R630/year.
Sign up here, cancel at any time.

AUTHOR PROFILE

COMMENTS   11

Sort by:
  • Oldest first
  • Newest first
  • Top voted

You must be signed in to comment.

SIGN IN SIGN UP

Well the corruption and cadre credentials were to be expected..

More interestingly, non seem to have any medical background or applicable epidemiology qualifications to tackle Covid-19.

Once again, while govmt pushes the giant boulder up the mountain on inflated salaries, the impoverished public will have to tackle this crisis themselves.

That’s socialism for you.

I blame WMC!

No but seriously why are the financial officers allowed to get away with this? There are not many business in the private sector where CFOs will survive an audit like this. In public sector this is the norm.

Missing something. Traditional affairs. World over tradition is looking after your own interest. Naive to think different. Freedom have no meaning without a huge bank account. World history is about the haves, nothing else. One day, offspring will donate a billion, if needed, to help others, who will never succeed.

It is very simple. You can’t put a mouse in charge of a cheese factory and neither can you put an alcoholic in charge of a bottle store. The temptation is simply too big and they just can’t help themselves.

Losing amounts like these should be seen as treason, and be dealt with accordingly.

But no accountability has brought us, to where we are.

This is nothing compared to the Zupta looting.

Absolutely pathetic. Cyril, please have courage and fire people with no mercy!

Just qualified to become a member of parliament

Here is (another) graphic of how the proposed NHI will operate.

Please show me one example where the ANC has been successful in anything related to management of funds etc.? Pease – I dare you?

That’s what you get if you appoint aspiring pig farmers and theatrical producers to run things way beyond their level of incompetence and integrity.

End of comments.

LATEST CURRENCIES  

USD / ZAR
GBP / ZAR
EUR / ZAR

Podcasts

NEWSLETTERS WEB APP SHOP PORTFOLIO TOOL TRENDING CPD HUB

Follow us:

Search Articles:Advanced Search
Click a Company: