You are currently viewing our desktop site, do you want to download our app instead?
Moneyweb Android App Moneyweb iOS App Moneyweb Mobile Web App
Join our mailing list to receive top business news every weekday morning.

SA extends its Vat net to cover the globe

Services provided electronically are now in Sars’s crosshairs.
Treasury says it is ‘intentional’ that no distinction is made between business-to-business transactions and business-to-consumer transactions. Picture: Shutterstock

The scope of regulation pertaining to the value-added tax (Vat) treatment of electronic services supplied by a foreign company to a South African company or individual has widened.

Amended regulations released by National Treasury on Monday (March 18) state that “all services” that are provided by means of an electronic agent, electronic communication or the internet could now fall into the Vat net.

Rodney Govender, tax director at PwC, says foreign companies will have to look at the services they are supplying in SA.

Multiple Vat registrations for multinationals

“Multinationals who operate in global structures and supply their products to South African companies or individuals from various offices around the world could end up having multiple [Vat] registrations in SA.”

He gives the example of a software group supplying services to South Africa from its different companies around the world. Because each of these companies is a separate entity, each one will have to register for Vat in South Africa if the value of their taxable supplies exceed R1 million in any 12-month period.

Des Kruger, tax consultant at Webber Wentzel, says South Africa led the way in 2014 when it introduced new rules to tax cross-border electronic services.

The widening of the scope of e-commerce transactions that may be subject to Vat is, however, “profound” because it will affect “most cross-border” transactions between a foreign company and a South African resident.

Govender says there has been a change to the definition of a group of companies in an effort to exclude most intra-group transactions.

Initially a “group of companies” was defined as companies where there was 100% common shareholding. It has now been defined as companies where the common shareholding is 70%.

In the South African context there are a number of companies who may fall below the 70% common shareholding because of the black economic shareholding they had to comply with. These companies will have to register for Vat.

“A lot of businesses who are affected by the regulations have been asking about the significance of the South African market to them.”

However, while Govender says they are aware of these discussions, they have not seen any movement.

Kruger points out that most foreign jurisdictions adopted a distinction between supplies made from business-to-business and business-to-consumer.

All cross-border e-commerce potentially affected

Unfortunately, South Africa has decided not to draw a distinction between B2B and B2C transactions and all cross-border e-commerce will potentially be affected.

“While this intra-group exclusion [70% common shareholding] is to be welcomed, it may not be enough to accommodate those group transactions where the common shareholding threshold of 70% will not be met,” says Kruger, a member of the Vat work group of the South African Institute of Tax Professionals (Sait).

Govender questions the reasoning behind Vat registration for companies doing business with other companies since the transaction would be tax-neutral.

There is not much to gain from a revenue perspective, so why pursue this? If a company provides software to a mine – it will charge the Vat to the mine and the mine will claim it back.

Administrative obligation

“All this means is that you are creating an administrative obligation for companies, and the cost of compliance just gets that much more,” says Govender.

“I know it is a principle of Vat, but when you think about cross-border transactions you have to think differently. Do you really want non-residents in your [tax] base? They have no presence in South Africa and you cannot interact with them, apart from online. This is not ideal.”

Treasury says in the explanatory memorandum that neither the Vat Act nor the regulations make any distinction between business-to-business transactions and business-to-consumer transactions: “This is intentional. This distinction does not exist for domestic suppliers and in the interest of fairness and equity, the distinction will not be introduced for the purposes of these regulations.”

The amendments to the regulations come into effect on April 1.

Kruger says foreign suppliers who render electronic services into South Africa need to “urgently consider” to what extent they are affected by the new rules.

Get access to Moneyweb's financial intelligence and support quality journalism for only
R63/month or R630/year.
Sign up here, cancel at any time.



Sort by:
  • Oldest first
  • Newest first
  • Top voted

You must be signed in to comment.


If it moves, tax it. Keep going until it stops moving.

We need all the money in the world to pay for Eskom, lets keep the lights on.

Have a look at the a developing nation called Georgia.

They went straight up and created a tax regime which is simple and business friendly. There are 6 tax codes with most being 5%.
Simpler is better.

I do agree that digital companies are getting away with not paying their fair share of taxes, hopeful Sars can look into that as well.

You do know how VAT works right? You as the customer pays it and not the company. Boggles the mind… what this says that if you want to do business in SA you need to be VAT registered if you do over a million Rand and that you charge VAT to the SA customer – ie government wants its cut like a gangster in a deal without adding value and only increasing the cost to you as a consumer.

The mind boggles at how people think that this is a good thing…


Say you are a local tech company with cloud computing and music sharing goals. Do you think it is correct that your R150 per month includes VAT but Spotify takes 100% instead of R130?????

@Etienne @Johan_Buys
These overseas companies are walking around 15% cheaper it is that simple.
If you see the same product one costing R100 and the other R115, you and I both will prefer the R100.

I can gurantee you that those same corporates companies pay almost zero business tax whilst strangling competition.
That is why Google has been fined yet again in Europe, I think it is almost R25bil.

And just how will the tax man force the foreign company to comply. Does SARS think they can outsmart the millions of businessmen outside of SA? If they do then they are on the road to disappointment. What would be the check mechanism for SARS? There is none.

Getting increasingly desperate?

I wonder if this idea wasn’t promoted by DSTV to punish its opposition as it loses market share?

End of comments.


Insider GOLD
ONLY R63pm

Moneyweb's premium subscription is a membership service which will give you access to a number of tools to take charge of your investments.
Choose a yearly subscription at R630pa - SAVE R126

Get instant access to all our tools and content. Monthly subscription can be cancelled at any time.

Follow us:

Search Articles:Advanced Search
Click a Company: