Sars plans to revive tax courts

Key part of enforcement strategy going forward – executive.
Taxpayers stand in line at a Sars branch at the start of tax season. Sars hopes to revive tax courts as part of its enforcement efforts. Picture: Moneyweb

The South African Revenue Service (Sars) hopes to reinstitute tax courts as it steps up its enforcement efforts.

Speaking at the release of the 10th annual edition of the Tax Statistics, Dr Randall Carolissen, Sars group executive for research, said tax courts could expedite the movement of tax matters through the courts and is going to be a key part of Sars’s enforcement strategy going forward.

The general criminal justice system “deprioritised” tax matters as it was not deemed that important, he added.

Advocate Eric Mkhawane, CEO in the Office of the Tax Ombud, said local tax courts – which were closed down a number of years ago – could previously prosecute taxpayers for non-submission of tax returns. Currently some taxpayers would rather pay an admin penalty than submit a tax return.

“I think it [tax courts] may help deal with those that are not submitting returns and I am sure the numbers are shooting up for returns that are outstanding.”

Sars is under pressure to intensify its collection efforts after finance minister Malusi Gigaba instituted a probe into the under-collection of revenue. The Medium-Term Budget Policy Statement (MTBPS) showed that tax revenue was expected to fall R50.8 billion short of the 2017 budget estimate of R1.265 trillion for 2017/18. Sars collects roughly 90% of government revenue.

Despite significant tax increases over the past two years, the Tax Statistics revealed that South Africa’s tax-to-GDP ratio has stalled at 26% during 2015/16 and 2016/17 after gradually rising in the wake of the global financial crisis. At the same time, the tax buoyancy ratio, a measure of the sensitivity of tax revenue to changes in economic growth, has dropped from 1.29 in 2015/16 to 1.07 in 2016/17.

Source: Tax Statistics 2017

There has been concern that the significant drop in the tax buoyancy ratio was related to lower tax morality, a decrease in compliance levels and a deterioration in efficiency at Sars, but Carolissen said during tough economic times the buoyancy ratio moved closer to the long-term average (1) and might dip below it.

“As the economy starts to recover we hope to increase that buoyancy.”

He said tax policy changes were, to some degree, suppressed by the weak economy. At the moment, personal income taxes were only growing at about 8.5%, while the expectation was that it would at least maintain its previous growth rates of 12% (plus the additional policy reform measures).

“That didn’t manifest itself.”

Carolissen said a number of factors influenced tax collection and tax revenue growth. The performance of the economy was probably the biggest contributor to tax collection whilst policy reform, the efficiency of collection and compliance also played a role.

“We have seen slippage in compliance. We have seen an increased trend of people not submitting their returns.”

There were also increasing numbers of taxpayers submitting returns with no payments and submitting nil returns.

It is a criminal offence not to submit a return, he said.

“Up until now Sars has probably been leaning too much on its service and education arm of its compliance strategy and less so on its enforcement arm and I’m afraid that we will have to look at that mix and probably be looking very carefully at those people that are cynically refusing to pay the taxes because they are dissatisfied with government.”

Carolissen said Sars could not allow a slippage in compliance – once it started to take root, it is very difficult to reverse.

“With regards to the efficiency of Sars – I believe we are still a very efficient organisation. I mean to collect the large amounts of money that we actually do, you have to have a machine that is working.”  

AUTHOR PROFILE

COMMENTS   9

Sort by:
  • Oldest first
  • Newest first
  • Top voted

You must be signed in and an Insider Gold subscriber to comment.

SUBSCRIBE NOW SIGN IN

Courts dealing with the recovery of money taken by state capture, fraud and blatant criminal activity should be the priority and instituted first so that the very low figure of the only 16% of the population that are registered to complete tax returns for SARS can see that their tax money is not being diverted to someones back pocket or being wasted or vanishing or paid out on unnecessary ‘GOLDEN HANDSHAKES’ to a privileged few. Then, a few fast tracked convictions with hefty jail time penalties for stealing state money would be the incentive for people to ageing not hold out on paying tax. Until then, tax courts will be just another financial drain on the fiscus.

Agreed, read “The President’s Keepers” and you’ll see that millions were spent on chasing guys like Mark Lifman and Adriano Mazzotti who owed SARS hundreds of millions of Rands. However, the Commissioner, Tom Moyane, stopped the investigations by hounding everyone out of SARS who were investigating them. Needless to say, these investigations died a quiet death. That was easy money just waiting to be collected but SARS is not allowed to go after “friends and family” and definitely not after the Guptas.

Besides interest charges, what are the legal and penalty consequences of the following form of tax revolt by persons offended by Jacob Zuma, yet limited to peaceful protest:

1. Declare income properly as usual and on time.
2. Pay R783 instead of the amount that the system calculated.

When the zupta gang are displaced and being prosecuted, resume payment of all outstanding taxes and interest

The main tragedy is that the ANC, instead of using its resources to raise up those previously disadvantaged by Apartheid, is instead using its resources to pull down those previously advantaged by Apartheid.

This is the root of all our problems in South Africa – as it effectively encourages people to blame those previously advantaged, while teaching those previously advantages that they are unwanted and hated, which leads them to naturally feel that they have to focus their efforts on protecting themselves, instead of working together.

The ANC, instead of being a non-racial organisation working towards national unity, and the betterment of all, is instead a corrupt racist revenge cult.

Carolissen said Sars could not allow a slippage in compliance – once it started to take root, it is very difficult to reverse

The same can be said about corruption.

This is not about slippage in compliance – this is about conscientiously refusing to bankroll a criminal mafia. Apparently 25% of taxpayers did not file tax returns. I salute you – and would be happy to contribute to any fund set up to support you in court against SARS.

THE “PRESIDENT” ZUMA DOES NOT PAY HIS TAX.

WHY SHOULD WE?

ZUMA APPARENTLY OWES SARS R 63,000,000?

IS THE TAX REVOLT IS STARTING?

THAT IS WHAT ZUMA AND THE ANC DESERVE FOR NO GOVERNANCE AND NO WORK DONE FOR SOUTH AFRICAN TAX PAYERS.

End of comments.

LATEST CURRENCIES  

USD / ZAR
GBP / ZAR
EUR / ZAR
BTC / USD

Podcasts

Instrument Details  

You do not have any portfolios, please create one here.
You do not have an alert portfolio, please create one here.
INSIDER SUBSCRIPTION APP VIDEOS RADIO / LISTEN LIVE SHOP OFFERS WEBINARS NEWSLETTERS TRENDING

Follow us: