Sars withdraws amended list for qualifying disability expenses

Attack on taxpayers’ ability to claim relief for costs associated with education of the disabled described as ‘mean and disrespectful’.
The proposed change would have placed a massive administrative burden on special needs schools. Image: Shutterstock

The South African Revenue Service (Sars) has withdrawn its list of qualifying physical impairment or disability expenditure following widespread public comments since the draft document was published.

Moneyweb recently reported on the list and the outrage it caused.

Moneyweb Insider INSIDERGOLD

Subscribe for full access to all our share and unit trust data tools, our award-winning articles, and support quality journalism in the process.

Choose an option:

R63 per month
R630 per year SAVE R126

You will be redirected to a checkout page.
To view all features and options, click here.

A monthly subscription is charged pro rata, based on the day of purchase. This is non-refundable and includes a R5 once-off sign-up fee.
A yearly subscription is refundable within 14 days of purchase and includes a 365-day membership.

Click here for more information.

Read: Sars wants to limit tax relief for disabled costs (May 27)

People who were affected by the amended list described the attack on the ability of taxpayers to claim tax relief for the education cost of the disabled “mean and disrespectful”.

In the draft list, school fees as a qualifying expense has been removed as Sars argued that school fees are not in the consequence of a disability, but in consequence of education.

The proposed change required an “itemised list” detailing the nature and cost of each intervention, including school fees, to be specified on the invoice or on a covering letter issued by the school.

A ‘misunderstanding’ says Sars

In a statement released on Tuesday (June 1) the revenue authority says many of the public comments appear to be based on a misunderstanding of the intent of the proposed amendments to the list.

“In order to permit more time to engage with stakeholders, explain the intent behind the changes and understand the concerns raised, the decision has been taken to withdraw the draft disability list,” Sars says in its statement.

A further draft disability list “may” be published once this process has concluded. Until then, the current list will remain in force, it says.

Administratively burdensome

The principal of a special needs school in Johannesburg says the proposed change was not practical and would have caused a massive administrative burden on special needs schools.

Many schools would have had to appoint someone to specifically deal with the task of itemising each child’s “interventions”.

“It is just not practical,” she says.

The withdrawal of the list now allows for more time to meet with the Sars disability team.

The principal believes it is critical for Sars to talk to specialists who deal with not only physical disabilities, but also with mental and learning disabilities, to gain a better understanding of the plight of the disabled.

Special needs expenses are not a luxury

“It is not a luxury for parents to send their children to special needs schools. It is a necessity.” In many instances the medication per month alone comes to around R10 000.

Without the tax relief, many parents would not be able to afford the special needs schools. Many would close their doors.

Craig Miller, Tax Director at Webber Wentzel, earlier said the argument that school fees were not in consequence of a disability, but in consequence of education was a very simplistic way of looking at it. He welcomed the withdrawal of the list. It is a positive development that Sars is now prepared to engage with the various stakeholders.

What ‘misunderstanding’?

However, it is unclear why Sars refers to a “misunderstanding” about the intent behind the initial list that was published for comment.

It clearly stated school fees are not in consequence of a disability, but in consequence of education. It further stated that school fees “will not qualify as a medical expense under this list”.

“Hopefully there will be proper engagement and common sense will prevail,” says Miller.

Last year parents received the first curveball when school fees for private and public special education needs schools were limited to the amount in excess of fees at their closest fee-paying private or public schools.

Misguided

The latest approach, which caused the outcry, was to require that the cost of “interventions” at the school “in consequence” of the disability should be listed separately. This includes, among others, a care worker assisting a child, a social worker or psychologist, occupational therapist, physiotherapist or audiologist assisting the learner.

Kyle Mandy, tax technical and policy director at PwC, also welcomed the decision to withdraw the draft list and to engage further with stakeholders.

“We believe that the decision was the appropriate one in the circumstances,” he says.

“We now expect that Sars will initiate a more comprehensive consultation process.”

This includes consultation with a broader range of interested stakeholders through a series of workshops and consultations over the coming months with the objective of obtaining a better understanding of the educational needs and challenges of the disabled, says Mandy.

Keith Engel, CEO of the South African Institute of Taxation, says in its submission to Sars the proposed change would have introduced substantial administrative requirements.

“Although we acknowledge the concern that Sars has with regard to risk management and fraudulent claims, we believe that the current proposal will have the effect of stifling access to the relief that the taxpayers are entitled to as a matter of policy.”

Before any change, the institute believes that specific engagement with special needs schools and related advocacy groups should be undertaken.

“This engagement will assist Sars in balancing the need for revenue collection with the need to provide the taxpayer with adequate tax relief,” says Engel.

Please consider contributing as little as R20 in appreciation of our quality independent financial journalism.

AUTHOR PROFILE

COMMENTS   14

Sort by:
  • Oldest first
  • Newest first
  • Top voted

You must be signed in to comment.

SIGN IN SIGN UP

SARS — Serial African Robber Society ??

“Sars refers to a “misunderstanding” about the intent behind the initial list”

with reference to the above, what a lame excuse from sars – the misunderstanding is probably from sars themselves and not the other way round – an organisation which spunch on soft targets but loosing billions of tax income because it does not have the b–ls to tackle and address the illegal markets / traders in south africa

@Johannes. I share your sentiment. This is how our draconian Tax law works:

From April 2021, SARS have removed a requirement for them to prove that certain taxpayer’s mistakes / negligence of non-compliance were inadvertent/unintended (so that one is guilty of a criminal offense)

But when SARS makes a mistake, by INTENTIONALLY published this draft proposal (now withdrawn), they declare “sorry, is was a misunderstanding”. How easy.

From now on, all inadvertent errors by taxpayers and their accountants, will now be considered as “misunderstandings”, right SARS?!

NO! SARS cannot get away without criminal offenses: the individual(s) at SARS that made this proposal should be named & shamed, and their bodies should be dragged through the riotous streets….because, when the guilty officials are ‘maimed for life’….then they can START TO LEARN what it is to be disabled/handicapped: they can also go to a specialist to have their ‘ITR12-DD’ disability declaration completed by medical specialists, and accordingly claim their disability costs. This would be the best practical learning curve for such malicious SARS officers. Or be demoted/fired.

SARS, please let these unscrupulous employees not hide behind an organization: the public will soon demand who they are.

I think that, in its war on its citizens, the government has unleashed a voracious SARS to extract every last cent from our pockets. In fact, why the charade? Convert SARS into a sort of bank into which all our salaries etc. are paid. SARS then – grudgingly – gives us what they think we should get and then give the rest to Treasury to splurge on parastatals, vehicles, bodyguards, booze. If ever there were bandits let loose, then it must be this lot, scraping the ground on which the barrels stand, let alone the bottom of the barrels…

I guess thats how Communists operate. They go after the productive / working class.

Robinhood behaviour… Steal from the Rich and forget about the poor.

When I read the history books it shows a living was made by plunder and pillage. Nothing has changed.

SARS have not a cooking clue about disability and the impact heaped on tax paying families!
an alternative would be a special “Disability Tax” levied on all MP’s as it seem that they were all disabled when it came to the looting!

I would assume the worst disability is no brain. SARS and the ANC seem to suffer from it.

Disgraceful and heartless behaviour by SARS. Disgusting bullying of vulnerable citizens. And then the futile lies about ‘misunderstanding’. BS.

National Treasury, bring this incompetent and backward arm of government to heel. Start with SARS’s Stone-Age IT systems and ignorant public-facing staff. And tell your colleagues in government to stop allowing the theft of taxpayers’ money. The Minister of Health’s office might be a good starting point.

Only then will SARS have earned the right to float new tax proposals. Remember e-tolls!

Starting point for Treasury to stop the pillage by SARS is Public Enterprises’s Pravin Gordhan, now actively backed by Finance’s Tito Mboweni in their absurd and futile quest to keep SAA and Mango in the sky when the there’s not even safe and functional trains in SA, and millions of children struggle to get a single meal in a day!

Whatever gov. dept statement is challenged its always been “taken out of context” “misunderstood” or any other excuse.

If only they went after the taxi industry with the same enthusiasm.

Agreed, it seem Eddie has been told hands off :
– Taxi industry
– Illegal Tabaco factories in JHB
– Cadres with Aston Martins and the like, the rest are fair game
– Intelligence agency masquerading as a petty cash/million fund for nr1

Still waiting on my refund for taxes paid but stolen..

“misunderstanding”… pathetic!

SARS, do your homework properly next time. Kieswatter is getting too desperate….

End of comments.

LATEST CURRENCIES  

USD / ZAR
GBP / ZAR
EUR / ZAR
BTC / USD

Podcasts

INSIDER SUBSCRIPTIONS APP VIDEOS RADIO / LISTEN LIVE SHOP OFFERS WEBINARS NEWSLETTERS TRENDING PORTFOLIO TOOL CPD HUB

Follow us:

Search Articles: Advanced Search
Click a Company: