You are currently viewing our desktop site, do you want to download our app instead?
Moneyweb Android App Moneyweb iOS App Moneyweb Mobile Web App

NEW SENS search and JSE share prices

More about the app

Steps to curb tax avoidance using trusts could be discriminatory

Wits academic argues new section 7C may be ‘a bit draconian’.

JOHANNESBURG – A proposed regulatory amendment that aims to plug tax avoidance where interest-free or low interest loans to trusts are concerned, may be discriminatory on a religious basis, an academic has argued.

The draft Taxation Laws Amendment Bill includes a section 7C provision that will make it disadvantageous for someone to sell assets to a trust to which he or she is a “connected person” (usually beneficiaries of the trust or family of the founder) and extending a low- or interest-free loan to the vehicle.

This has been a common way for individuals to reduce estate duty. The assets could be transferred and funded by way of an interest-free loan to the trust. The loan was then written off over time by using the R100 000 annual donations tax exemption. This allowed assets to increase in value outside the estate of the original owner. National Treasury is of the view that this could rob the state of estate duty.

According to the Davis Tax Committee, only 33% of the 333 465 active registered trusts appear to be tax compliant.

Alwyn de Koker, Professor Emeritus of Tax Law in the School of Accountancy at the University of the Witwatersrand, says in terms of Sharia Law a Muslim person is prohibited from charging interest when he advances a loan to a trust. As a result the proposed section 7C may be discriminatory on a religious basis.

Moreover, the proposed anti-avoidance measures could prove to be highly problematic.

“While the need for targeted anti-avoidance measures on trust structures is warranted in line with South Africa’s socio-economic policies, the proposed mechanism creates undue complexity.

“In fact I think that section 7C is a bit draconian and it subverts the fundamental requirements and characteristics of simplicity, equity, fairness and practicality.”

De Koker says the provision suffers from an inherent conflict and its interaction with other provisions of the Income Tax Act is troublesome.

Firstly, it targets all trusts, not simply family trusts, which may have undesirable consequences.

“There are a multitude of diverse purposes to which trusts are put into today’s legal and commercial environment and thus it may be that based on a particular set of facts, a charitable trust will also be vulnerable to the section 7C regime. The same principle applies to other trusts like those set up for minors, those set up for former spouses, commercial trusts including black economic empowerment trusts and asset protection trusts.”

In its current format it also applies to offshore trusts, which is unnecessary as a section 31 transfer pricing provision already caters for soft-interest loans to offshore trusts.

De Koker says there are also concerns about the possibility of economic double taxation and the inconsistent basis upon which the tax charge is calculated.

While it seems that National Treasury’s intention is that the new provision should be applied to new and existing loans from March 1 2017, the current wording has led some tax practitioners to believe that only new loans will be affected.

De Koker says apart from the inherent complexities and inconsistencies perhaps the most important observation is that the provision is not absolute.

“It does leave scope for planning, creative structuring and an opportunity to arbitrage inconsistencies in the legislation.”

Background to reform

South African government policy is premised on the notion of building an inclusive society and to reduce inequality by means of progressive fiscal policies.

“Now the trust as a legal institution sits ill with the concept of inclusiveness. Secondly it is perceived as an impediment to economic transformation in my opinion and thirdly it contradicts the fundamental constructs of public policy,” he says.

Moreover, the sui generis (of its own kind) nature of a trust coupled with the tax framework it is argued reduces the tax base and subverts the fundamental principle of equity on which the system of tax is ideologically based.

“Proponents of this view argue that trusts are primarily employed by affluent individuals and families to transfer wealth and avoid taxation,” De Koker explains.

He says the response by National Treasury in the form of the new proposed section 7C is an overkill as it expands the body of burdensome anti-avoidance legislation which is constructed to be punitive in nature.

  • De Koker was a speaker at the 2016 Tax Indaba.

Oops! We could not locate your form.

Please consider contributing as little as R20 in appreciation of our quality independent financial journalism.



Sort by:
  • Oldest first
  • Newest first
  • Top voted

You must be signed in to comment.


I do not understand this. Does it mean that ONLY trusts set up by muslims should be allowed to use the interest free loophole? Anyway everybody knows that muslims do charge interest on loans, only it is called something else. Otherwise I would like to borrow a few billions from muslims or from muslim banks and just park the money in a savings account in an other bank and enjoy the income from the interest. Since the money will sit in a recognised large bank they would not require other security.

What you will be doing is basically an arbitrage between two Great Prophets. It is like stealing the sacramental wine. King 4 code does not allow this….

The more pertinent question is why are estates being levied tax at all, in essence this estate duty is a freeby to Treasury who had no part in the establishment nor the running of the estate but come along on the death of an individual and suck funds out of a deceased estate, but have added no value to the deceased estate in his/her life time. All it does is deny the heirs under the estate some of their inheritance – whilst SARS has been sucking taxes at ridiculous rates for the entire life cycle of the deceased,and, you also pay fees to an attorney/bank for winding up the estate, and these numbers can be quite significant

This degree of tax micro management really sucks the life out of being a business person. At a certain stage it seems a better to just buy Kruger Rands with any spare cash and realise them or distribute them, without any paperwork, to family members as needed.

End of comments.





Follow us:

Search Articles: Advanced Search
Click a Company: