You are currently viewing our desktop site, do you want to download our app instead?
Moneyweb Android App Moneyweb iOS App Moneyweb Mobile Web App

NEW SENS search and JSE share prices

More about the app

Tax implications arising from the devastating insurrection and carnage

That which couldn’t be stolen was smashed to bits.
Marauding mobs ransacked hundreds of businesses, looting and destroying equipment and other assets, as at this supermarket pictured on July 15. Image: Bloomberg

The carnage was widespread, with trucks, warehouses, storage facilities and buildings looted and set ablaze. Among the items looted were consumables, fancy goods and work stations. Computers containing vital information were stolen. That which couldn’t be stolen was smashed to bits.

The full tax implications will emerge over the next few months, but this article seeks to point out the immediately apparent ones.

Trading stock – income tax implications

The retailers that were looted, including opticians, pharmacies, supermarkets and funeral parlours, lost all their stock.

The value of trading stock at the end of the year will be the cost price of the stock, less any amount by which the value of the stock has been diminished, for example, theft, damage, deterioration, change of fashion, obsolescence, decrease in market value, or any other reason.

Any reason would have to pass the test of what the commissioner of the South African Revenue Service (Sars) thinks is just and reasonable.

According to Joon Chong, tax partner at Webber Wentzel: “In our view, the looting of trading stock is an inherent risk of carrying on business in South Africa. The reduction in value of trading stock as a result of the looting and violence should be accepted by the commissioner as a reason for the diminution in value of closing stock.”

Where the cost to replace the damaged or looted stock is covered by an insurance policy, the value of such stock would not be deductible for tax purposes. It is more complicated when stock is destroyed as a result of public unrest, terrorism and public violence, as Sasria is the only company that covers this risk.

Taxpayers should check whether they have cover with Sasria.

If Sasria’s cover doesn’t pay back 100% of the value of the stock destroyed or lost, the taxpayer can claim the difference as a deduction for tax.

Read:

If the taxpayer’s financial year-end occurs before the insurance claim has been finalised, the taxpayer should claim the full amount of the value of the stock looted or damaged as a deduction for tax in that financial year, and disclose the insurance payment as income in the year in which it receives the insurance payout.

Chong further advises that: “The value of closing stock for this financial year may be diminished due to damage or loss, with no corresponding increase of turnover which would usually be the case where there is a sale of stock. In addition to the loss of trading stock, the loss of revenue and costs of repairs is likely to result in an assessed loss for the taxpayer, which would be carried forward to the next financial year.”

Trading stock – Vat implications

If the taxpayer is a value-added tax (Vat) vendor, the vendor will claim input Vat on the trading stock purchased. This is done on the monthly or bi-monthly Vat return.

Where the trading stock is destroyed, damaged or lost this will not result in a deemed supply.

Where the input Vat amount is larger than the output Vat amount, this will result in a Vat credit, which is a Vat refund to be refunded by Sars.

The receipt of the insurance payout from Sasria would be a deemed supply, and the taxpayer would have to declare the output Vat on this amount.

Chong advises that “where the insurance payment was for a total reinstatement of goods stolen or damaged beyond economic repair – where the vendor would not have been able to claim input Vat on the acquisition on these goods in the first place (such as motor vehicles) – there would then not be a deemed supply on the receipt of the insurance payment”.

Plant and machinery and other assets

Assets used in the production of income such as plant and machinery, and other assets like computer equipment, are deducted for tax over the periods allowed for in the Tax Administration Act. Where the asset has been destroyed or damaged beyond repair, the net value after the deduction of the accumulated wear and tear allowance can be deducted for tax.

Chong explains: “Insurance payments from Sasria to replace the lost plant and machinery would be a deemed supply where the vendor claimed input Vat on the acquisition of the plant and machinery. The taxpayer would need to declare output Vat on receipt on the insurance payments as a result of the deemed supply.”

She adds: “The insurance payments could also give rise to recoupments of the historic allowances claimed where the value of the insurance payout is greater than the tax written-down value. Where the insurance payout is greater than the initial acquisition cost of the plant and machinery [for example, due to inflation], the difference between insurance payout and acquisition cost would also be a capital gain.”

Where the insurance payout is used to acquire replacement assets within 12 months, and the replacement assets are brought into use within three years, the capital gain is spread over the new write-off period of the new asset.

Filing the returns for payroll taxes and Vat

Employers are required to file the return regarding payroll taxes on a monthly basis. Vat returns must be filed on a monthly or bi-monthly (small entities) basis.

Chong mentions the late payment penalties: “Late payments of payroll taxes and Vat after the due dates would result in a 10% late payment penalty and interest from the first of the following month at the current rate of 7% per annum. Late payment of provisional taxes would also result in the 10% late-payment penalty.”

She advises that: “Employers and vendors who are unable to meet their payment obligations should apply for deferral of their payment obligations or a compromise/waiver of tax debts.” If this is not done Sars will take steps to recover the debt.

The Tax Administration Act provides for the remittance of the 10% late payment penalty where there were exceptional circumstances.

Employers and Vat vendors should apply for remittance of the 10% late payment penalty on the basis of exceptional circumstances, which includes “civil disturbance or disruption in services”. This will also allow for interest to be remitted.

Taxpayers impacted by the recent civil unrest should apply to Sars for the remittance of the penalty and interest as soon as possible.

Moneyweb reached out to Sars for comment

  • Some smaller entities would have lost all their records, as computers were stolen and/or smashed to bits. Physical documents, including Vat invoices, may have been destroyed by fire. Many offsite storage facilities housing motor vehicles, goods and records were also looted and set ablaze. Do you have any comment?
  • Vat registered enterprises which have lost all their stock, as well as business premises that were destroyed, will not have any taxable supplies after this month. This may result in a Vat refund for this month, and Vat returns with no taxable supplies thereafter. Vat refunds often spark an immediate Vat audit. Will implicated taxpayers be similarly treated?
  • Will Sars consider automatically waiving the late payment of payroll taxes and Vat for implicated taxpayers?
  • Has Sars considered setting up a special unit to deal with all the tax implications of implicated taxpayers?
  • There will be many complex tax issues, and many small enterprises have been affected. Has Sars considered putting out a practice note to deal with all the common tax issues?

Moneyweb is still awaiting Sars’s response.

Please consider contributing as little as R20 in appreciation of our quality independent financial journalism.

AUTHOR PROFILE

COMMENTS   26

Sort by:
  • Oldest first
  • Newest first
  • Top voted

You must be signed in to comment.

SIGN IN SIGN UP

Yet another article by Barbara Curson that epitomises responsible journalism.

Anybody who suggests that private property should be nationalized in the public interest must be mentally handicapped or a career politician. Anybody who believes that legally enforced BEE codes can add value to society, as a whole, is equally intellectually impaired or self-serving.

Keep in mind that the state(voters) already receives 30% to 40% of profits from private companies, and between 20% to 45% of the salaries of their employees. Then, if that private business performs well and builds capital value, the state owns 20% to 36% of those capital gains. When the owner and the employees of that private business die, the state receives 20% of those assets by means of estate duties. Add the municipal rates and taxes and the elevated cost of electricity and services that private businesses are forced to purchase from monopolistic SOEs over a lifetime, and it becomes clear that all private property and businesses in South Africa belong to the state already.

All businesses in South Africa already have more than a 50% BEE partnership with average citizens, even before they are coerced into the popular 30% BEE scheme. That is why the current BEE laws plunder the poor and the unemployed. BEE schemes infringe on the rights of beneficiaries of the National Treasury. Therefore, the social grant recipients and the unemployed pay for BEE schemes. Those who are in dire need of economic transformation are forced by law, to indirectly pay for the economic transformation of the politically connected elite.

The state is the largest beneficiary of privately owned businesses, especially when we consider the risk/reward ratio for the state. The government does not invest capital, nor does it take any risks in the production and marketing process. Government inserts itself at the bottom line. It parasitizes the profit margin. It does not invest capital, skills, or know-how. It merely extracts the results of other people’s skills, capital, expertise, and work ethics.

When private property is nationalized the government will, in fact, remove itself as a parasitic beneficiary. Nationalization of private property will do to the government what a shot of ivermectin will do to a parasite.

Great comment. The government is a shareholder in every profitable enterprise.duh.

Why do they try to destroy businesses since they are destroying themselves in the same process?

Stupidity is the only answer

Probably your best comment ever.

ivermectin lol you guys went so quiet about that one. What is the next miracle folksy boer raad thing?

Well, how did your muti work for you at Marikana? How about all the people that die from TB, while they have been inoculated for TB? I regularly use my ivermectin and I haven’t even had a common cold this year. Plus, there is the added bonus that I do not have any ticks, fleas, and internal parasites ……yet. Like everyone else, I am struggling with external parasites to a certain extent, but the constitution allows people to vote for the ANC. There is no medicine for stupidity.

Yip, Africans and their mutis and faith based medicines. You said it.

Hmm, let me get in a bit about the ANC because that is totally relevant right.

Bib, you’re such an edgelord.

Oh gosh,you are still upset at being laughed at for suggesting a a student account when acting like a big shot investor from bellville. Time to move on bud.

You’re trying too hard, Bib.

not trying hard hard is what got you blowing hard about a student account. No thanks. You remind me of those guys who never moved on from high school.

Bwahahahaha your comebacks are lame af.

yet you keep coming back. Big time investor who never moved on from high school.

Very informative article !!
Thank You !!!

Agreed-bottom line -the criminal conduct of the looting hordes will cost the fiscus a lot of money. Unemployment will go up-so even less PAYE and UIF, people will have lost a lot of spending power so less VAT collected and companies will claim huge tax losses asset out in this thought provoking, inciteful and concise article.

Once again many people in South Africa(and thousands of stores were looted so there were thousands of criminals involved,) have scored an own goal ie even less left in the ever diminishing pie.

Once again SAM says-if you can make a living elsewhere or have sufficient assets-FLEE THE FAILED STATE!

Why haven’t you? You either don’t have the assets or you don’t have the skills. Either way, it is hard to take your advice seriously when you don’t.

All taxpayers in SA should receive a full refund for a pro-rata part of the national budget that is wasted on the utterly useless SAPS, whose sole “use” is to intimidate surfers.

You forgot their greatest achievement to date. Arresting 4 swimmers in Plett.

SARS will still screw you. Those guys that lost all that paperwork, nightmare coming for them.

Pity these barbarians did not burn a few municipal offices, get rid of all those arrears rates accounts.

i wonder if any of them had effective robust business continuity plans in place. i gurss not.

In simple terms, your cost of sales is Opening Stock plus Purchases less Closing Stock. The chaos meant you had a lot more purchases than normal. Reduce your Purchases by what insurance paid.

Only gets complicated when Santam quibbles and pays you in 2023 for the claim you submitted in 2021 :/

An event like this might be a case study in the value of hosted accounting systems. In most cases you can attach source documents (scanned or emailed PDF invoices) to every transaction, so lost paper files don’t matter as much.

As usual there will be a few dodgers that take this opportunity to game the tax system.

“expropriation without compensation” comes with unexpected and very bad consequences – no matter what side of the fence you’re on.

every time this barbarians hijack a car or burgle a house it is a looting in the small but accumulating to even worse than what we saw last week!

Forgot to mention the SASRIA bailout that will be coming and be funded by us again.

The mob was Africa taking it tax. Let’s call it the ‘you have one and I have none, then I break yours and we have none’ tax? This is the prelude to the social gesture of ‘We now have none but you have some so give me one’. Repeat. This Malthusian trap continues ad infinitum.

End of comments.

LATEST CURRENCIES  

USD / ZAR
GBP / ZAR
EUR / ZAR
BTC / USD

Podcasts

INSIDER SUBSCRIPTIONS APP VIDEOS RADIO / LISTEN LIVE SHOP OFFERS WEBINARS NEWSLETTERS TRENDING PORTFOLIO TOOL CPD HUB

Follow us: