You are currently viewing our desktop site, do you want to download our app instead?
Moneyweb Android App Moneyweb iOS App Moneyweb Mobile Web App

The developed world’s corporate tax war could hurt SA

Government needs to be bold in its approach to tax to encourage FDI.
The probability of greater Foreign Direct Investment is threatened by the looming corporate tax war. Picture: Bloomberg

Global business news has been dominated by fears of a trade war between the United States of America and China – a situation that would no doubt impact many other countries too.

In addition to the challenge that this poses to the stability of the world economy, Donald Trump’s America is on the brink of setting off a corporate tax war among developed nations, and this holds an equally significant threat to efforts at greater economic equality across the world.

Corporate tax rates set by countries play a huge role in driving what is known as profit shifting: the move by the world’s largest corporates to limit their tax liabilities by selecting a region with a low rate of taxation as the jurisdiction that will collect tax from them on certain types of passive income. Although this is not illegal, it has significant negative effects on many parts of the world, in particular those in the developing world (including South Africa as a high tax jurisdiction), which desperately need greater tax revenue to develop their economies, work against poverty and create employment.

Profit shifting has been the subject of numerous working groups under the banner of the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), and the developed nations have demonstrated their support for these efforts strongly, not least by participating in the efforts to limit profit shifting. Their goal is to limit the huge losses in tax revenue caused by profit shifting –approximately $600 billion.

If positioned correctly, developing nations like South Africa could benefit significantly from a change in corporate tax culture globally, by driving foreign direct investments (FDI) its way. 

But the probability of greater FDI is threatened by the looming corporate tax war. President Trump is using lower corporate tax rates – down from 35% to 21% – to stimulate the US economy through attracting more business to the country. In addition, by announcing the substantial decrease in American taxes for businesses, Trump has set off a chain reaction of other countries announcing similar moves – all geared to keep their piece of the global tax pie. The United Kingdom, another leading player in the action against profit shifting, plans to drop its already low rate of 19% to just 17% by 2020, and a number of other strong economies plan to reduce their rates too.

South Africa will find itself at the tail end of FDI globally since it will be far more attractive for corporates to put money into jurisdictions that will charge them less tax, in addition to removing or reducing barriers to entry. While our government has in the past looked to the possibility of raising the headline corporate tax rate to address our backlog in tax revenue, I believe that consideration should be given to the exact opposite approach. If we gradually reduce our corporate tax rate to a level similar to the EU average of 19.48%, starting with the 2019/2020 legislative cycle, and if we maintain greater political stability in the near future, we are likely to see South Africa becoming more attractive to global businesses, and South African companies will also be more keen to remain registered here and continue paying taxes here.

If government were to do this, and to introduce initiatives to stimulate local economies in the most deprived regions of the country, such as establishing exclusive economic zones offering even lower corporate tax rates, we will see more investment in poor areas of South Africa.

Implementing ideas like this requires bold leadership. But it would be leadership that would align our country with the leading economies of the world. If any country on the African continent is in the position to do so, it is South Africa.

Ruaan Van Eeden is  managing director, Tax and Exchange Control, at the Geneva Management Group.


Sort by:
  • Oldest first
  • Newest first
  • Top voted

You must be signed in to comment.


Sad truth of this article is the number of times “if” is mentioned

There are two fallacies in this article. The first is the so-called “huge losses in tax revenue caused by profit shifting –approximately $600 billion.” Can anybody provide actual proof for this number, please? It really looks like a thumb suck. Just in South Africa, we have had transfer pricing legislation since 1995, we have exchange controls, controlled foreign company rules in Section 9D, thin capitalisation rules plus the general anti-avoidance rules in Section 80. All these tools make it simply impossible for multinational enterprises to shift profits around the globe. It makes me think that it is just convenient to make someone the scapegoat. Secondly, corporate tax by its very nature is complex because you have deductions, add backs, realised forex and unrealised, allowance calculations, tax holidays etc. To stare blindly at a rate alone is misleading. You need to do the actual calculation do get an idea of the tax liability. Additionally start up businesses normally have losses in the first few years in any case with no tax liability. By contrast, withholding tax and customs are sitting duck taxes for Revenue Authorities because it is simple to calculate and simple to administer. Corporate tax is not the be all and end all that will lure investment or not.

I think you should youtube Apple congress hearing or starbucks or amazon hearing in the uk if you think its simply impossible for multinational enterprises to shift profits around the globe.

Obviously, the USA and the UK don’t have exchange controls.

As written by Mike Schussler last week our FDI is already in the doldrums. The focus is on high personal tax and VAT rates. How will further reductions in corporate tax rates be achieved? Our middle class is being squeezed out of existence by tax wastage, non-delivery, rampant crime, declining property values and socialist speak from all three of the largest political parties. Individual taxpayers are becoming voiceless with politicians in a race to reach the low road.

“The US reduce corporate tax rate, which lead to chain reaction for rest of the world to follow suit in order to KEEP their share of the global tax pie”.

Let me repeat…listen carefully now, SA Govt…in order to KEEP your tax revenues, you reduce Corporate tax rate (i.e. to attract more business & income).

SA Govt needs MORE THAN bold leadership: they need balls!! Do they have it what it takes?

(“car SA” is emptying it’s fuel tank, in order to drive further…)

They also need brains and a 1000 year head start..

End of comments.





Follow us:

Search Articles:Advanced Search
Click a Company: