You are currently viewing our desktop site, do you want to download our app instead?
Moneyweb Android App Moneyweb iOS App Moneyweb Mobile Web App
Join our mailing list to receive top business news every weekday morning.

Climate change is already costing meat and dairy producers a lot

Little transparency in an industry that contributes significantly to the problem.
Animal protein industries are suffering from increased droughts, floods and storms. Image: Bloomberg

The meat and dairy industry is increasingly feeling the effects of climate change, but they’re abnormally quiet about their own role in the crisis, according to a new report.

The sector is responsible for about 13% to 18% of global greenhouse gas emissions caused by humans due to deforestation and the emissions linked to raising animals. But about 77% of the meat and dairy industry makes little to no disclosure about emissions from their operations and supply chains, according to a study released on Wednesday by London-based investor network Farm Animal Investment Risk & Return, known as Fairr.

Meanwhile, animal protein industries are suffering from increased droughts, floods and storms. The Australian Agriculture said earlier this year it lost $A107 million ($72 million) and 43 000 head of cattle largely due to the effects of floods and drought, while US egg producer Cal-Maine said feed costs are volatile and could be higher after historic rainfall and flooding impacted grain prices. South African poultry producer RCL Foods warned it could see profits hit by irrigation restrictions linked to droughts.

Read: RCL Foods bruised by tariffs and taxes 

“Awareness has only really grown recently about how impactful this sector is across all environmental and social risks,” said Fairr director Maria Lettini. The report looked at 60 companies. The group, founded by private equity executive Jeremy Coller’s foundation, produces research on the food sector on behalf of investors with a combined $16 trillion in assets.

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change warned earlier this month that falling crop yields due to climate change in some areas were already starting to put the world’s food supply at risk.

Deforestation linked to cattle raising in Brazil has captured the public attention recently around the fires in the Amazon, but none of the 50 largest meat and dairy companies have a comprehensive global policy aimed at stopping deforestation, Fairr said. Most of the sector provides very little detail about the emissions associated with raising animals as well, according to the report.

Oil and gas companies like Exxon Mobil and Chevron are much more transparent about the greenhouse-gas emissions of their businesses, scoring higher on ESG disclosure transparency than almost all agricultural companies, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. Tyson Foods is currently the only protein producer with an emissions reduction target linked to the global environmental goals in line with the Paris Climate Agreement’s goal of limiting global warming to 2 degrees Celsius, Fairr said.

The trend toward plant-based meat could be a preview of some of the shifts ahead because demand for protein is rising globally, Lettini said. About a quarter of the 60 companies analysed had some investments in alternative proteins.

“We can make our current meat operations more sustainable to some extent, but in the end of the day, as demand for protein is growing, there’s going to have to be some kind of trade off,” she said.

© 2019 Bloomberg L.P.

Get access to Moneyweb's financial intelligence and support quality journalism for only
R63/month or R630/year.
Sign up here, cancel at any time.


You must be signed in to comment.


Another doomsday prophesy directed at the terrible cattle farmers who also provide the nations with dairy products for not putting gas bags at the rear end of their cattle to catch these terrible greenhouse gasses. I wonder should people also be forced to catch their gasses in similar bags, a thought that greenhouse believers should seriously consider as it would definitely result in a much greener footprint.

A common misconception, its not actually cow farts that release methane, they actually belch (burp)

The poor cattle all they are doing is digesting grass by chewing the cud and burping every now and again.

We cant grow grass inside and it is a major part of a ruminants diet. Dont only blame the cattle, all buck are ruminants too.

I don’t think they are the worst offenders.

Cows aren’t really the only problem, in fact they are actually part of the solution, you need cows roaming around in grass fields excreting and putting those nutrients back in the ground, this allows for more fertile grasslands that can be massive carbon stores, its the whole principle of regenerative agriculture.

They key however lies in keeping the balance perfect, and any overgrazing will just put you back in the same problem.

End of comments.





Follow us:

Search Articles:Advanced Search
Click a Company: