Europeans scramble to work out what they can do about Iran

As tensions in the Middle East rise.
Image: Bloomberg

European leaders are battling to come up with a response to the escalating tensions between Iran and the US with their Middle East strategy shredded and the nuclear deal dead in all but name.

As French President Emmanuel Macron worked the phones, German Foreign Minister Heiko Maas on Sunday called for a meeting with his European Union counterparts to be brought forward to this week.

The killing of Qassem Soleimani — one of Iran’s top commanders and the country’s second-most-powerful figure after Ayatollah Ali Khamenei — was more than just a shock for the EU: It was a disaster. The bloc has been fighting an increasingly desperate and lonely campaign to keep the 2015 Iran nuclear accord together ever since President Donald Trump pulled the US out in 2018.

The fruit of more than a decade of diplomatic efforts by France, Germany and the UK was laid to waste on Sunday when Iran said it no longer considers itself bound by its international obligations to restrict the enrichment of uranium. Meanwhile, the Iraqi parliament responded with a non-binding vote to expel US troops from the country, risking a resurgence of Islamic State.

For the Europeans, with a long and checkered history in the region, it is the worst possible outcome and one they have little power to change beyond the use of words. Leaders of the three countries issued a statement Sunday saying they “urge Iran to reverse all measures inconsistent with the JCPOA,” as the accord is known.

The statement was the most noteworthy for not mention Trump or the US action explicitly. It was a carefully-crafted six paragraphs “on the situation in Iraq.” Dominic Raab, UK foreign secretary, spent a lot of Sunday doing the round of shows to explain the UK understood the action the Americans had taken while never explicitly backing it.

Maas said the Europeans “have proven and reliable channels of communication on all sides, which we have to make full use of in this situation.” In truth, the nuclear agreement had been unraveling and Macron-led efforts to help Iran get around US sanctions got little traction.

Its collapse removes a key plank of the EU’s efforts to maintain stability in the region, and lays bare the limitations of EU foreign policy as a whole. EU foreign ministers were meant to gather Jan. 20 and — at Germany’s urging — the bloc’s new foreign policy chief, Josep Borrell, might rally diplomats earlier. In all this, it remains to be seen how Iran will avenge Soleimani’s death.

What is clear is that it has taken more than 48 hours for Macron, the UK’s Boris Johnson and Germany’s Angela Merkel to issue a common stance calling for a reduction of tensions — showing they may be struggling to hold a united front.

The French leader has stuck his neck out the most. In August, Macron tried to engineer a rapprochement between the US and Iran when he brought Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif to Biarritz, France, for meetings on the sidelines of a Group of Seven summit attended by Trump. At the United Nations annual gathering he appealed to Trump and Iranian President Hassan Rouhani to have “the courage to build peace.”

French charge

Macron more or less had the support of the UK and Germany. But it’s unclear whether that stays the case with the US cranking up the pressure for allies to pick a side.

“Frankly, the Europeans haven’t been as helpful as I wish that they could be,” Secretary of State Michael Pompeo told Fox News. “The Brits, the French, the Germans all need to understand that what we did, what the Americans did, saved lives in Europe as well.”

Johnson, triumphant after a decisive UK election win, has come under fire at home for staying on holiday while the crisis unfolded. Emily Thornberry, foreign policy spokeswoman for the opposition Labour Party, asked in a newspaper column: “Is he afraid of angering Trump? Or is it simply that, as he lounges in the Caribbean sun, he simply does not care?”

Johnson has a good personal rapport with Trump and wants a post-Brexit trade deal with the US On top of all that, there are many reasons why the UK is cautious. It is unlikely to risk another military engagement in the Middle East after Tony Blair’s premiership was ultimately undone by his backing for the Iraq War. David Cameron, another UK prime minister, was humiliated in 2013 when parliament vetoed his commitment to back US military action in Syria.

With the attention focused on Iran’s next step, some have a different interpretation to Iran’s declaration that it would no longer abide by any limits on its enrichment of uranium.

Ali Vaez, Iran project director at the International Crisis Group, a research institute based in Brussels, said that Tehran is still being measured.

Iran’s decision to put aside the cap on the # of centrifuges as its 5th step away from its JCPOA commitments is less harsh than the initially feared resumption of 20% enrichment. This shows Iran still wants the Europeans on its side and doesn’t want to break the deal yet.

“All calls for retaliation or reprisals will simply lead to more violence in the region and they are in no one’s interests,” Johnson said in a statement after calls with Trump and fellow Europeans.

© 2020 Bloomberg L.P.


Sort by:
  • Oldest first
  • Newest first
  • Top voted

You must be signed in and an Insider Gold subscriber to comment.


“The fruit of more than a decade of diplomatic efforts by France, Germany and the UK was laid to waste on Sunday when Iran said it no longer considers itself bound by its international obligations to restrict the enrichment of uranium.”

Iran was never going to abide by this in any case. Their intransigence in the region and their vying for power with Saudi Arabia has been a constant festering sore, resulting in current sanctions and the increase of misery for its population.

They have no intention of promoting a harmonious ME but rather have been jockeying for dominance for decades, now with Chinese arms.

Happy New Year ala Dumpster style!

The Dump has gotten started nice and early, assassinating the de facto minister of defense for Iran at a civilian airport in Iraq.

This is his “Act of peace” not “Act of War”, pplease remember…

For Dumpster says he was ambitious (to do terrible acts of violent terrorism), and Dumpster is an honorable man… guilty..yes/no/ surely, maybe, maybe not?

Oil and gold making skyscrapers on the graph paper, and again the fashion victims insist we remain disinvested from carbon dirty fuels and primary commodities and make way for the the 4th industrial revolution.

Can anybody else churn some sensibility from this- most else on the market is tumbling except the vestiges of the tyrants, narcisists and sociopaths- war industry and satans straws (cigarettes) for eg…

Any happy New year takers for diversified manufacturing, services..financials even. Anyone, anyone ?(hollow echo from the empty tube of JSE non-miners!)

Not so fast, as 2020 gets off to a dramatic firecracker start. Can the World of United Nations and reasonability establish a quorum to enact the fairest principles of International Law and ring in the harmony and peace needed for both developing and developed to cooperate deeply and have an actual chance of success?

Acts of Integrity enacted with heaps of Enthusiasm, Good Luck for us all 2020!

End of comments.




Instrument Details  

You do not have any portfolios, please create one here.
You do not have an alert portfolio, please create one here.

Follow us:

Search Articles:
Click a Company: