Zuma denies interfering with Transnet CEO appointment

Processes were followed, Zuma tells inquiry.
Former South African President Jacob Zuma says due process was followed in the appointment of Transnet CEO, Siyabonga Gama. Picture: Kim Ludbrook, Pool via Reuters

Former South African President Jacob Zuma denied on Wednesday having interfered with the appointment of a chief executive at transport and infrastructure company Transnet, during his third day testifying at a corruption inquiry.

The inquiry is looking into allegations that Zuma, ousted by the governing African National Congress (ANC) party in February 2018, allowed cronies to plunder state resources and influence senior appointments during his nine years in power.

Transnet, which operates railways, ports and fuel pipelines, is one of a handful of state-owned firms that became embroiled in corruption scandals during Zuma’s tenure.

Read: Zuma insisted on Gama for Transnet job, Hogan says

Zuma’s successor, Cyril Ramaphosa, is on a drive to clean up politics, although analysts say this effort could be hurt if the inquiry fails to pin down a case against Zuma. Zuma has long denied any wrongdoing.

Former public enterprises minister Barbara Hogan told the inquiry that Zuma had told her at a meeting in 2009 that Siyabonga Gama was his “only choice” to be CEO of Transnet.

Gama was at the time subject to disciplinary proceedings because of procurement irregularities, and Hogan said Transnet’s board of directors wanted to appoint another candidate it deemed better qualified for the job.

Asked whether he had told Hogan that Gama was his only choice for Transnet CEO, Zuma told the inquiry: “It couldn’t be like that, we don’t work like that. As I say there was a process. … I would have been undermining the process.”

Zuma, 77, has so far ducked and dived at the inquiry, which he agreed to set up during his final weeks in office.

Read: Zuma receives more death threats

On Tuesday he said he could not recall details surrounding an incident where his business friends the Guptas allegedly offered a former lawmaker a ministerial position.

On Monday the former president, who still enjoys significant support in rural areas and his home province of KwaZulu-Natal, said he was the victim of a decades-old plot by enemies at home and abroad to get rid of him.

Alleged corruption

Gama eventually became Transnet CEO in 2015 and was involved in allegedly corrupt contracts worth tens of billions of rands to procure locomotives.

Gama, who was fired last year after trying unsuccessfully to halt his removal, was not available for comment. He has denied the allegations against him.

A Gupta-linked firm earned huge consulting fees from the locomotives deal.

The Guptas, who left South Africa around the time Zuma was ousted, have consistently denied having looted state firms like Transnet.

Transnet has sought to recover via the courts money it says was misspent under Gama’s leadership.

State prosecutors have said they are following the inquiry and they could open cases if sufficient evidence of wrongdoing emerges.

Get access to Moneyweb's financial intelligence and support quality journalism for only
R63/month or R630/year.
Sign up here, cancel at any time.


Sort by:
  • Oldest first
  • Newest first
  • Top voted

You must be signed in to comment.


He is just to clever for the whole lot.

He is not even lying so they can get him for perjury. He avoids it.

He just say’s he “could” not have said something like that. Because it would undermine the process.

Whatever JZ says is immaterial, for the truth is well hidden in a huge barrel of lies and deception. The best one can hope for from the Zondo Commission is that JZ tells a lie that can be proven and will lead to some form of justice. The short cut is rather to follow the money, which always leaves a tangible trail. I appreciate the fact that it might require a truly gifted forensic financial investigator, but it will show how the spoils were shared and hopefully from whom the instructions came… and has the best chance of standing up in a court of law.

You just don’t have anything against the men, simple…

End of comments.





Follow us:

Search Articles:Advanced Search
Click a Company: