You are currently viewing our desktop site, do you want to download our app instead?
Moneyweb Android App Moneyweb iOS App Moneyweb Mobile Web App
Join our mailing list to receive top business news every weekday morning.

Can the SADC resolve Zimbabwe’s crisis?

The time-consuming diplomatic processes will not do much to put citizens and businesses at ease.
Soldiers are seen on the armoured vehicle outside the parliament in Harare, Zimbabwe on November 16, 2017. Picture:Philimon Bulawayo/Reuters

The Southern African Development Community (SADC) was formed in 1992, and has some 15 member states. Various protocols have been put in place to enable member states to “work together harmoniously in achieving effective results on common problems and issues”.

One of these is the Protocol on Politics, Defence and Security Cooperation, which was passed on August 14 2001. The objective is to promote peace and security across Southern Africa, and to ensure the protection of inhabitants where there is a breakdown of law and order. States are also to cooperate on matters relating to security and defence.

Whereas member states retain sovereignty, the SADC is committed to resolving intra-state conflict by peaceful means. The SADC is, however, mandated to consider “enforcement action in accordance with international law as a matter of last resort”.

A “significant intra-state conflict” in terms of the protocol includes:

·       Large-scale violence such as ethnic cleansing, genocide and a gross violation of human rights,

·       A military coup or other threat to the legitimate authority of a state,

·       Civil war,

·       A conflict, which threatens peace and security in the region (which will include South Africa).

The news coming from Zimbabwe is of concern, with current reports of tanks in the streets and the police being disarmed. President Mugabe and his wife have been “contained”, but the army has given assurances that they are safe and secure. The army is apparently focussing on removing the “criminals” around the President who are committing crimes. Time will tell who these criminals are.  Meanwhile, Zimbabweans are queuing up at banks and stocking up on goods. That is assuming that the shops are stocked. News bulletins are already referring to the situation as a military crisis.

Read: Half-hearted coup extending Zimbabwe’s reign of terror

The SADC has issued a statement that it “will continue to closely monitor the situation and remains ready to assist where necessary to resolve the political impasse in keeping with established SADC Protocols and processes”.

The SADC, slow to respond to the initial reports, is supposed to have an early warning system of regional conflicts. It is apparent that this failed.

President Jacob Zuma, as chairperson of the SADC, calling for restraint and calm, has dispatched special envoys to Zimbabwe and Angola. The Minister of Defence and Military Veterans, Ms Nosiviwe Mapisa-Nqakula, and the newly-appointed Minister of State Security, Advocate Bongani Bongo, will meet with President Robert Mugabe and the Zimbabwean Defence Force (ZDF).

Thereafter, the special envoys will travel to the Republic of Angola to brief President Joao Lourenco, chairperson of the SADC organ on politics, defence and security. A number of questions arise. Can the representatives of the SADC actually meet with an army that has allegedly carried out a coup? If the army has not actually carried out a coup, why would the SADC meet with them? If the special envoys are involved in a negotiation with the military that Mugabe steps down, will this amount to the SADC approving the changing of a “legitimate authority of state”? On the other hand, if Mugabe remains in power, but under the control of the veterans, until a deserving successor has been named, the SADC can heave a sigh of relief that they were not forced to show a weak hand.

The unfolding “diplomatic processes” seem time consuming, and will not do much to put citizens and businesses at ease, never mind tourists emerging from the bush after a luxury safari. The US Embassy in Zimbabwe has cautioned employees to stay at home, and instructed US citizens in Zimbabwe to seek shelter until further notice. One can only hope that the situation is speedily resolved, with no further outbreak of violence.

Read: The good and bad news about Robert Mugabe’s exit

Sadly, the beleaguered economy will take another punch to the gut, further impoverishing the people. This can only lead to continuing political instability – putting any potential solution at risk.

One thing is certain, this is the end of Grace Mugabe’s political aspirations.

Get access to Moneyweb's financial intelligence and support quality journalism for only
R63/month or R630/year.
Sign up here, cancel at any time.

AUTHOR PROFILE

COMMENTS   7

Sort by:
  • Oldest first
  • Newest first
  • Top voted

You must be signed in to comment.

SIGN IN SIGN UP

….now with “Gucci Grace” political aspirations hobbled, I’m actually looking forward to see Grace (hopefully) pursuing private sector interests, like starting an Electric Extension Cord manufacturing business? As the future CEO, she has at least ‘experience’ in this industry, right?

#1 Jail President Mugabe.
#2 Extradite the money in hidden foreign bank accounts.
#3 Make it favourable for business to conduct business.
#4 Return the rule of law and not Crony law.
#5 Return the farms to their rightful owners.
#6 Keep President Zuma out of Zimbabwe.

White farmers being murdered and robbed of their farms – not a word.
Mugabe under house arrest and a tank parked in the road – all come to the rescue.

Just look at Sadec’s own definition (that would cover the case of the white farmers): “A “significant intra-state conflict” in terms of the protocol includes:

· Large-scale violence such as ethnic cleansing, genocide and a gross violation of human rights”

Nothing will happen. Mugabe will claim Coup. Zuma will rush our army in and overthrow the Zimbabwe army then all will thieve happily ever after.

I don’t very much if SA’s army can do much in Zimboland – they can’t even manage gangsterism in the Western Cape so would be utterly useless up north

This is not the SADF of old this is the SANDF , they are not a patch on the Zim army
Remember what happened in CAF they got their arses handed to them

Look, if African Union () can’t resolve a crisis like this because it is too weighted down by its own subterfuge, confusion and ambivalence as two what
‘democracy’ means, and how to lead; what really makes anyone believe that SADC can? It says it, right there in their name its just a SAD bunch of Cats. There is no need for a ‘water pass’ or a need to perform a lobotomy – they have a policy position on ‘coup d’etats’ but they are now as silent as a mouth, because they have been secretly wishing the old man meets with the biological miracle soon.

End of comments.

LATEST CURRENCIES  

USD / ZAR
GBP / ZAR
EUR / ZAR

Podcasts

NEWSLETTERS WEB APP SHOP PORTFOLIO TOOL TRENDING CPD HUB

Follow us:

Search Articles:Advanced Search
Click a Company: