ARC Investments U-turns on rights offer plan

But questions about the sizeable fund management fee remain …
The company says it has two separate pools of capital – and there was a typo. Image: Shutterstock

African Rainbow Capital (ARC) Investments has done an about-turn on its plan to use R205 million of the R750 million it plans to raise through a rights issue to pay outstanding management fees for the 2019/20 year.

In an announcement on Friday, ARC Investments said it would “settle the fund management fee from internal cash resources”. This, it claims, is as a consequence of the board deciding to “cancel” the convoluted set-off agreement where the fee would be settled through subscription in the rights offer process. This would’ve avoided the flow of funds from ARC Investments to general partner UBI, which then pays through 95% of the fund management fee to (unlisted) African Rainbow Capital as an “investment services fee”.

In the circular for the rights offer, ARC Investments said the board had determined that the set-off agreement was “the most commercially advantageous manner to do so”.

Quite how this changed in a week is not clear.

Now that the set-off agreement has been cancelled, ARC Investments is at pains to state that: “The purpose of the rights offer will therefore solely be to raise additional capital for ARC Investments to invest in the ARC Fund for use in its existing portfolio companies and for future acquisition opportunities, and none of the rights offer proceeds will be utilised for purposes of settling any fund management fees.”


Trying to claim that there are two separate pools of capital within the business – one to invest and one to pay fund management fees – is, however, completely disingenuous.

ARC Investments has a single pool of capital with which to invest in portfolio companies (or the ARC Fund) and pay the fund management fee.

ARC Investments’ current market capitalisation is R2.82 billion, which means the rights offer equates to over a quarter of the company’s value.

In an interview with the Financial Mail’s Giulietta Talevi, ARC Investments co-CEO Johan van der Merwe contends that the rights issue equates to “only 7.5% of the company” given its published net asset value (NAV) of R10 billion.

The fund management fee of R205 million for the past year comprises 7% of market capitalisation.

In the pre-listing statement, ARC says part of the fund management fee is “in consideration for the General Partner’s obligation to maintain the ARC Fund’s B-BBEE credentials”.

It also says the fee is used to actually manage the fund. Van der Merwe states: “We’ve also got a team of about 20 people — we rent premises, we travel, we work — who have to be paid.

“That is what the fee is there for.”

Van der Merwe says this is a “standard fee and if you look at private equity — and this is almost a listed private equity vehicle — private equity usually charges 2% and 20% [on outperformance] … “.

“We charge 1.75% on a sliding scale and 16% on outperformance.”

At R205 million for the most recent financial year, this equates to an average of R17 million of costs a month, which he asserts ARC and UBI do not make “huge profits” on.

R453m in fees in three years

Since listing, ARC Investments will have paid a total of R453 million in fees to UBI (R94 million in the first 10 months, R153 million in the year to 30 June 2019, and this R205 million).

Van der Merwe told the FM: “The fee is something that was there from day one.

“Maybe some people didn’t like it, but if they didn’t they shouldn’t have bought shares.”

The fund’s NAV, on an IFRS basis, is R9.983 billion as at June 30. When this exceeds R10 billion (and is below R15 billion), the fee will drop to 1.5% “on the average of the Opening Invested NAV and Closing Invested NAV of that Quarter”. Fees when NAV is above R15 billion are 1.25%.

Moneyweb last week questioned why the circular referenced the accrual of interest at “the prime rate plus 5%” if the fund management fee is not paid on the due date, while the pre-listing statement specified the rate as “the prime rate plus 2% per annum”.


In the announcement on Friday, ARC Investments says “a typographical error in paragraph 3.7.1 of the rights offer circular incorrectly states that in terms of the partnership agreement of the ARC Fund, the outstanding fund management fee, if not paid on due date, accrues interest at the prime rate plus 5%”.

“The correct percentage is the prime rate plus 2%, and there has thus been no change in this respect since the company’s pre-listing statement was issued on 28 August 2017.”

It says “all accrued interest on the outstanding fund management fee will be waived”.

“The error therefore has no impact on the rights offer.”


ARC Investments share price



Sort by:
  • Oldest first
  • Newest first
  • Top voted

You must be signed in and an Insider Gold subscriber to comment.


They can take 16% on realised fund gains if shareholdders are that dumb. What they are doing now is take fees on ABSURD valuation journal entries.

Hiding this behind IFRS excuses is offensive. Management determine the estimates and assumptions that the IFRS valuation spreadsheet spews out.

I have no skin in this game other than as taxpayer. I would not touch this with somebody else’s pole and it seems most sane investors take a dim view of the valuation compared to the NAV that management hides beuind. From another article it seems the fees are laundered through a Mauritian structure. Has SARS investigated this structure, the fees and the related parties as well as a close look at whether the various persons are or are not south african residents for tax purposes?

may be totally wrong but just by looking at arc’s investment share price graph and then to have a rights offer where that income is used to pay a large share of it as fund management fees simply does not tie up for me – if the management did such a excellent job should the share price in an ascending curve or what are they paid for??

keep on this one Hilton. Management fee based on NAV is a total misalignment with shareholders.

Keep on this Hilton. This to me is nothing but a rent seeking structure to make a fee more well off, the company may do well over time, yet at what cost. It’s just another boys club arrangement.

The royal family will benefit, PM has seen to that.

Well done Hilton. Keep the pressure up on this ridiculous scheme.
J&J have to my mind created a scheme between them and the Prince.
Rain When they listed was exceptionally overvalued, yet they want to raise further capital at these values. Poor shareholders ?

The other use of the rights issue money – to buy back shares – is even more ridiculous! Really concerning if management can’t do the math.

Does the JSE have to accommodate such characters? This is in bad taste.

What can one expect from this share?

Share price decline and no dividends?

End of comments.



Subscribe to our mailing list

* indicates required
Moneyweb newsletters

Instrument Details  

You do not have any portfolios, please create one here.
You do not have an alert portfolio, please create one here.

Follow us: