You are currently viewing our desktop site, do you want to visit our Mobile web app instead?
 Registered users can save articles to their personal articles list. Login here or sign up here

As Moyo crisis swirls, shareholders reject Old Mutual exec pay

Managed separation incentives criticised.

As Old Mutual suspended its chief executive officer Peter Moyo on Friday, then announced it had decided to “separate” with him, shareholders stunningly rejected the remuneration of the company’s executives at its annual general meeting (AGM).

The non-binding resolution on the implementation of the remuneration implementation report, in other words what it paid its executives in 2018, was rejected by 69.13% of shareholders who voted at the AGM. Only 30.87% voted in favour.

This is only the second time that shareholders of a JSE Top 40 company have outright rejected a company’s remuneration. The first instance was at Shoprite’s October AGM, where ordinary shareholders voted overwhelmingly against both remuneration resolutions: the policy and its implementation. Both passed overall thanks to the high-voting deferred shares, a structure the group is trying to unwind.

Read: Shoprite thumped on remuneration

Old Mutual’s non-binding vote on its remuneration policy received 54% of votes in favour. This is below the 75% required.

Last year, Moyo was paid a total of R50.571 million.

This included nearly R14 million in distributions from the unbundling of Quilter plc and Nedbank – something described by the group as an “unintended consequence”. He also received a R4.92 million sign-on bonus in 2017.

Read: Old Mutual execs score R46m in unbundling

Chief financial officer Casper Troskie, who joined Old Mutual from Liberty at the end of March 2018, was paid a total of R20.626 million last year. Included in this was a R4.7 million sign-on bonus “in respect of unvested share awards which will vest in three tranches with no prospective performance conditions” and a buyout award of R2.43 million (also with no prospective performance conditions).

The estimated fair value of Moyo’s shares under various incentive programmes (as at December 31) was R31.5 million, while Troskie’s was R10.9 million. Both included certain tranches of their respective buyout awards.

‘Managed separation’ incentives

As part of the group’s long-term incentive plans, once-off share awards were granted in a Managed Separation Incentive Plan (MSIP). This was “to align the senior management team with the completion of the Management Separation of the Old Mutual plc Group within a specified period, with the overall objective of unlocking value for shareholders”. Half of these awards were settled in cash, while 50% were deferred into forfeitable shares which vest in September this year.

This award is curious in that the bulk of the managed separation work predates the executives in charge of Old Mutual Limited (and was done by Bruce Hemphill and Ingrid Johnson when they headed up Old Mutual plc).

The two largest shareholders in the group, as at December 31, 2018, are the Public Investment Corporation (PIC), with 10.8% of ordinary shares, and Allan Gray (7.81% of ordinary shares, on behalf of its clients). With such a low vote in favour of the remuneration resolution, as well as historical voting patterns, it is almost certain that both voted against.

The group’s own asset management unit, Old Mutual Investment Group, voted against the resolution.

It says this was warranted for four reasons:

  • The company has granted transaction-related awards which are not supported by a compelling rationale;
  • The CFO received a sign-on bonus and a buyout award which are not adequately explained;
  • LTIP [long-term incentive plan] awards granted during the year appear to feature performance periods of less than three years and targets have not been disclosed prospectively; and
  • There is scope for better disclosure around the operation of the annual bonus.

This is the first time shareholders have had to vote on both the remuneration policy and its implementation (as per King IV), under the JSE’s listing requirements. Previously, as a UK-headquartered company with a secondary listing on the JSE, shareholders only had to vote on the directors’ remuneration report (specifically excluding the policy). Last year, this (ordinary) resolution received 71% of the votes cast in favour.

PIC still ‘dissatisfied’

The PIC voted against this resolution last year, saying that it “has always expressed its dissatisfaction of the Managed Separation Incentive Plan (MSIP), as well as the magnitude of the rewards which are viewed as unjustified, and the impact it will have towards executive remuneration. The PIC voted against the remuneration report as it includes the implementation of the MSIP.”

Old Mutual says, given that the two resolutions “received less than the required 75% of votes, [it] will directly engage with shareholders, the timing of which will be advised to shareholders in due course”.

Hilton Tarrant works at YFM. He can still be contacted at hilton@moneyweb.co.za.

Get access to Moneyweb's financial intelligence and support quality journalism for only
R63/month or R630/year.
Sign up here, cancel at any time.

AUTHOR PROFILE

COMMENTS   8

To comment, you must be registered and logged in.

LOGIN HERE

Don't have an account?
Sign up for FREE

Whew, thank goodness the shareholders’ resolution is just a slap on the wrist. Now back to the trough….

When the returns shoot the lights out the management are entitled to their obscene remuneration

just be VERY VERY full of gratitude with the little pay of R50 million PLUS ……… and then …… at least some TAX deductions of 45 % plus will go OFF!!! it help us as the BOURGEOIS in this country to get some sort of RELIEVE from SARS.

According to the JSE Listing Requirements, any related party transaction with a director over 0.25% of its market cap requires a SENS to be issued. For OML that’s any transaction worth R250m.

Either OML in breach of its continuous disclosure obligations here, or the conflict relates to less than R250m.

Wow-asset managers doing something in 2019! A nice change!

“The group’s own asset management unit, Old Mutual Investment Group, voted against the resolution”

Gotta admit, this made me chuckle a bit, haha…

OM senior management should walk around the office and mingle with the plebs, it would be nice to see what they look like!!

Load All 8 Comments
End of comments.

LATEST CURRENCIES  

USD / ZAR
GBP / ZAR
EUR / ZAR

Podcasts

SHOP NEWSLETTERS TRENDING CPD HUB

Follow us:

Search Articles:Advanced Search
Click a Company: