You are currently viewing our desktop site, do you want to download our app instead?
Moneyweb Android App Moneyweb iOS App Moneyweb Mobile Web App

NEW SENS search and JSE share prices

More about the app

Christo Wiese on the Steinhoff settlement proposal

‘A settlement has one characteristic: it leaves all parties somewhat dissatisfied.’

The original audio was in Afrikaans, as featured on RSG Geldsake, and has been translated in this transcription

Moneyweb Insider INSIDERGOLD

Subscribe for full access to all our share and unit trust data tools, our award-winning articles, and support quality journalism in the process.

Choose an option:

R63 per month
R630 per year SAVE R126

You will be redirected to a checkout page.
To view all features and options, click here.

A monthly subscription is charged pro rata, based on the day of purchase. This is non-refundable and includes a R5 once-off sign-up fee.
A yearly subscription is refundable within 14 days of purchase and includes a 365-day membership.

Click here for more information.

RYK VAN NIEKERK: Steinhoff’s proposal to settle more than 100 legal claims against it did pass the final hurdle as voting on the proposal was postponed to tomorrow. (10 September).

In terms of this exceptionally complex proposal, Steinhoff intends to pay around R25 billion to settle the R130 billion-odd worth of claims against the company. The largest individual claimant is former Steinhoff chair, Christo Wiese, whose claim runs to some R58 billion.

Christo is now on the line. Christo, a warm welcome to the programme. The settlement proposal has been accepted by various claimants in both South Africa and The Netherlands. Today saw a decision to postpone the voting process. Did something happen behind the scenes that could possibly thwart the approval of that proposal?

CHRISTO WIESE: No, Ryk. A process such as this is usually extremely complicated. If you think of the amounts involved, the jurisdictions and the number of people involved – claimants from bankers to contractual claimants to people who bought their shares on the stock exchange – one can understand that it is exceptionally complex and one has to expect that not everything will run smoothly. But one hopes tomorrow will signal the end of one of the steps in bringing an end to the sorry story.

RYK VAN NIEKERK: This settlement proposal has been dragging on for a long time; there was initially much dissatisfaction about it. Many of the claimants considered the money Steinhoff offered far too little. However, it seems now that most of these claimants are prepared to accept the offer. Is that your impression as well?

CHRISTO WIESE: That is certainly my view as well. Ryk, always remember that a settlement has one characteristic: it leaves all parties somewhat dissatisfied; that is the nature of a settlement.

RYK VAN NIEKERK: You are the largest claimant following your exchange of Pepkor for Steinhoff shares in I think 2014. That claim was R58 billion. What was your settlement agreement, in particular? How much of that amount can you get back?

CHRISTO WIESE: Well, that is in the public domain. The settlement agreement was that I get R8 billion of that back.

RYK VAN NIEKERK: That R8 billion is a great deal of money, but still effectively a very, very big haircut you need to take to receive it. How do you feel about it?

Read: Wiese backs legal settlement as Steinhoff claimants vote

CHRISTO WIESE: Ryk, if you consider that I worked at Pepkor with my colleagues for 50 years building a world-class business, that was what I call ‘stolen’ through fraud. What is most ironic is that those who stole it also now have nothing from it. The real beneficiaries are the bankers and people who lent money to the Steinhoff group long before the Pepkor transaction was concluded – a deal that now appears to be in the fraudulent statements. That is one of those big ironies.

Pep Stores, a business started by a family where all those worked there as a family, now belongs to people in New York and London who have never even seen a Pep store. That’s one of the fraud’s ironic outcomes.

RYK VAN NIEKERK: Many of them will get considerably more back than was invested. You are not the only one negatively impacted, but also ordinary people, those exposed to Steinhoff via their pension funds.

How did Steinhoff handle this situation?

CHRISTO WIESE: I think Steinhoff’s current management and executive did the best they could in the circumstances. There is a general consensus that, should the company be liquidated, certain claimants such as myself would do far better. Liquidation processes are replete with kinks which destroy fundamentally strong businesses.

There might have been a potentially better outcome, but at the end of the day I, as well as the other claimants, decided to put the debacle behind us and go on with our lives.

RYK VAN NIEKERK: The former owners of Tekkie Town have adopted another approach – actually a very interesting one. They want to get the business they themselves created back. They are not looking to receive a payout.  They have applied for Steinhoff’s liquidation. Steinhoff will be lodging an appeal against a previous High Court verdict that that liquidation application could be heard in South Africa. That will probably be in court for a while.

Read: Liquidation proceedings against Steinhoff can proceed

But how is this settlement process affected or obstructed by this settlement proposal?

CHRISTO WIESE: I can truly not venture an opinion on that, Ryk. You will understand that in litigious matters, especially other people’s litigation, it’s not clever to express an opinion.

RYK VAN NIEKERK: Nevertheless, it’s still very entangled – when do you foresee that you and other creditors will be able to draw a line, and continue with other rather more productive matters?

CHRISTO WIESE: I think all concerned, including the company, are keen to see this thing brought to a close as quickly as possible, but there are processes that have to be followed and people – whose names you have mentioned – who do not necessarily consider that in their best interests. Fortunately, there are courts to decide these matters.

RYK VAN NIEKERK: We are currently seeing a big fight for settlements for former investors, but on the other hand the process of finding people accountable – Steinhoff’s former chief, Markus Jooste, and his team – is much, much slower. What is your view of that slow progress?

CHRISTO WIESE: Well, Ryk, it’s clearly disappointing that it’s taking so long, because it raises doubt on the part of the man in the street about the workings of our legal processes. People are very quick to criticise the South African prosecution authority for taking so long, but one must keep two things in mind.

The first is that this type of fraud apparently committed and put together over a decade is highly complex.

The second thing is that in 2015 the German prosecution authority had already started investigating the people in Steinhoff. If one were to believe the newspaper reports, it laid a charge against Jooste only last week.

So these things are complex and will simply take time.

I foresee that the criminal court case, when it ultimately gets to court, will also take quite some time.

RYK VAN NIEKERK: Over the four years since the bomb went off, have you had any contact with Markus Jooste?

CHRISTO WIESE: No. The last time I heard from him was the day after he announced his shock resignation. I asked him to help me sort out the mess and he promised to do so, but he never turned up.

RYK VAN NIEKERK: Finally, you were recently very ill with Covid-19. How are you doing now?

CHRISTO WIESE: By the grace of God, pretty good. I’m a little better every day, but it’s a long process. It’s not something that you can shed with your clothes. But I’m very grateful for getting through it and that every day is a little better.

RYK VAN NIEKERK: Christo, thank you very very much for your time tonight. That was former Steinhoff chair, Christo Wiese.

Please consider contributing as little as R20 in appreciation of our quality independent financial journalism.

AUTHOR PROFILE

COMMENTS   18

Sort by:
  • Oldest first
  • Newest first
  • Top voted

You must be signed in to comment.

SIGN IN SIGN UP

All jailed people are also reported to be somewhat dissatisfied Idijit !!!

So they divided the shareholders that holds the same kind of share into kinds of shareholders, the ones that has more than enough money to hire lawyers and pursue court cases against Steinhoff, were offered more compensation percentage per share, and ones that don’t have the money to pursue court cases, which are the small share holders, were offered a much less compensation percentage per share.

Smart enough to grow a billion dollar company but dumb enough to know what yr number 2 man is up too……… Something doesn’t sit right.

I listened to the conversation and for the first time understand that their is actually NO money left. Even with a settlement proposal chances are slim that “investors” will get some money back. Even the fraudsters will have nothing to show at the end of the day?

What happened here is the culmination of decades of accounting shenanigans. If you “sail close to the wind” for too long, the risk that you may capsize becomes a certainty. They got away with tweaking the balance sheet for decades, but “you can’t fool all of the people all of the time”.

whether you like him or not, this MJ must be brilliant. To do what he did for so long and keep juggling all the balls at the same time for so many years without anyone catching on ….. and he was surrounded by some astute business brains. I can’t even lie to my wide without getting caught out. How did he manage this …?

wife

Lying to business partners and investors is much easier than lying to your wife because your position in society and your wealth never impress your wife.

I once spoke to a senior advocate who representsed MJ in another matter long before the bomb burst. He said MJ was the smartest witness he ever had on the stand in all his years of practice.

You don’t need brilliance when you’re surrounded with praise singers.

Walk on the dark side you get burned.

Ironic, cos this side was lily white lol

Yes I know, but you know what I mean, crossing from the white through that grey area then stepping over the line.

True story – Wiese wanted to reverse Shoprite into Steinhoff to create a mega retail business to launch into the global sphere. He’s moaning about Pepkor but two things (a) no one forced him to co-invest with Jooste, a very sleazy man waaay before the collapse and (b) it was Whitey Basson who stopped him putting Shoprite in and hence Whitey took ‘early retirement’ but he stopped it happening. Greed and hubris, Wiese and Jooste

He used this Steinhoff structure simply because he could bypass exchange controls to externalize his assets in a tax-efficient way. Poor North African economic refugees drown in the Mediterranean due to overcrowded boats. Wealthy South African economic refugees drown in accounting disasters due to overcrowded balance sheets.

Cool story

I’m alright Jack , only one of my companies money.

The E,C.B is buying bonds with digital printed money. Friend U.S showed the way. Resulting in a booming market were the sun never go down. In this environment, money laundering, Steinhoff, accepted by E.U professionals, did the typical South Africa thing of betrayal. Sorting out who did is no simple matter. Getting all noses one way takes time. Rest assured, they will, one day coming.

End of comments.

LATEST CURRENCIES  

USD / ZAR
GBP / ZAR
EUR / ZAR
BTC / USD

Podcasts

INSIDER SUBSCRIPTIONS APP VIDEOS RADIO / LISTEN LIVE SHOP OFFERS WEBINARS NEWSLETTERS TRENDING PORTFOLIO TOOL CPD HUB

Follow us:

Search Articles:
Click a Company: