You are currently viewing our desktop site, do you want to download our app instead?
Moneyweb Android App Moneyweb iOS App Moneyweb Mobile Web App

NEW SENS search and JSE share prices

More about the app

Debt strain forces Attacq to sell further R388m MAS stake

Property analysts and fund managers will be keen to see where the group’s debt and gearing levels stand when the fund releases its interim results.
Outgoing Attacq CEO Melt Hamman is set to present the group's interims on Tuesday. Image: Supplied

Attacq Limited – developer of the expansive Waterfall City precinct in Gauteng and once the biggest shareholder in European-focused MAS Real Estate – has had no option but to sell a further MAS stake in a deal worth just under R388 million to bring down the group’s burgeoning overall loan-to-value (LTV) or gearing level.

The group announced the sale last week to PKM Development Limited, just days before Attacq brings out its latest financial results for the half-year to the end of December 2020, expected on Tuesday morning.

It comes less than three months after Attacq sold a R500 million stake in MAS to a group owned by the Oppenheimer family.

‘Attractive development pipeline’ a key factor in R500m Oppenheimer investment
Despite cash constraints City Lodge opens new Waterfall City hotel

This means Attacq has slashed its MAS stake by almost half in the few months. Before the sales, Attacq had a 20.7% stake in MAS, which was valued at around R1.9 billion and made it the biggest single shareholder in the Isle of Man-based group.

The sales come in the face of the ongoing Covid-19 economic fallout, which has seen big devaluations of Attacq’s South African portfolio, as well as its rest of Africa and MAS investments.

These devaluations have contributed to the group’s LTV ratio hitting 45.7% at the end of its last financial year (ending June 2020).

However, with Attacq revealing in a pre-close presentation in early December that it had received an increase in its bank covenant levels from 49.2% to 60%, the group’s LTV may well have worsened.

With Covid-19 also causing headaches for Attacq’s planned disposal of its remaining, poor-performing rest of Africa assets (owned jointly with Hyprop), the group seems to have been forced to sell down its MAS investment by more than R880 million in order to bring down its overall debt and LTV ratio.

Attacq hit by R1.7bn SA portfolio devaluation
Hyprop dividend hit by up-for-sale Nigerian and Ghanaian assets

Attacq made no mention of plans to sell its stakes in MAS during its last financial results announcement (for the full year ending June 2020).

Listed property sector analysts and fund managers, who prefer LTV levels below 40%, will be keenly watching where Attacq’s latest LTV stands when the group releases it interim results.

At its pre-close, Attacq said the group’s interest-bearing debt by the end of September 2020 stood at just under R11.2 billion.

The group’s main South African property portfolio is valued at more than R20 billion.

However, its market capitalisation on Friday was just under R4.8 billion. This shows that the company is trading at a massive discount to its net asset value.

Attacq’s share price lost just over 2.6% on Friday, closing at R6.35.

However, the stock is up more than 30% since the start of the year and almost 4.3% firmer over the last 12 months.

The real estate investment trust (Reit) is not expected to pay out interim dividends for the six-months ending 31 December 2020, as per previous Sens updates on the JSE.

In its latest trading update published earlier in March, Attacq advised the market that distributable income per share (Dips) for the interim period will be between 55% and 60% lower than the Dips for the six months ended 31 December 2019.

Read: Jackie van Niekerk appointed CEO of Waterfall City developer Attacq

The group listed the following as reasons for the expected decline in its Dips:

  • South African Portfolio – a decline of between 19.5% and 24.5%, mainly due to discounts provided to support tenants impacted by Covid-19 (prior period income: R238.3 million)
  • Developments at Waterfall – a decline of between 5.5% and 10.5%, mainly due to an increase in holding costs on the Waterfall leasehold land (prior period income: (R17.3 million)
  • Investment in MAS – a decline of between 114% and 119%, mainly due to not receiving a dividend during the interim period (prior period income: R117.1 million); and,
  • Rest of Africa retail investments – a decline of 100%, due to not receiving any cash income from the company’s investments into the rest of Africa (prior period income: R12.1 million).

The Reit noted, however, that its available liquidity “was in excess of R1.3 billion” as at 31 December 2020. This comprised R1 billion in cash and R310 million of undrawn committed liquidity facilities with banks.

Please consider contributing as little as R20 in appreciation of our quality independent financial journalism.



Sort by:
  • Oldest first
  • Newest first
  • Top voted

You must be signed in to comment.


Wait till the interest rate rises in Q4 21

Its SA asset value is at least 4 x its market cap! – “The group’s main South African property portfolio is valued at more than R20 billion. However, its market capitalisation on Friday was just under R4.8 billion”.

Either the entire market is made up of fools, or Attacq’s valuation methodology is crooked. Can only be one. I suspect the latter.

The 20bn is the property valuation, it doesn’t take account of the debt…

Odd and the founder is a CA…

At 20 billion property value and 11.4 billion interest bearing debt, the liquidity crunch is closing it’s jaws on the frame of this entity.

Already joined the ranks of the Zombie corporation mayber?

Will she too succumb to the vacillations of most development companies true masters- the gangsters.. err… I mean Banksters!?

Yes, there is no magic in putting a few bricks together.

The founder Louis van der Watt left Jul 2017 just with the writing on the wall..

Can somebody please enlighten me.
A few years back i heard that the land Waterfall is built on belonged to a South African Indian family , the land was given to them by Paul Kruger.
The land was not for sale but leasehold only ,( 99 years? ) do owners have title to this land or is it leasehold?

End of comments.





Follow us:

Search Articles:
Click a Company: