You are currently viewing our desktop site, do you want to download our app instead?
Moneyweb Android App Moneyweb iOS App Moneyweb Mobile Web App

NEW SENS search and JSE share prices

More about the app

Eskom CFO Singh to face a disciplinary hearing

Matshela Koko’s disciplinary hearing to commence within the next two weeks, power utility says.
Suspended Eskom CFO Anoj Singh faces allegations that he granted preferential treatment to Gupta companies for coal-supply contracts. Picture: Moneyweb

South African power utility Eskom has suspended its chief financial officer pending a disciplinary hearing, the firm said on Friday, the latest fallout from allegations of influence- peddling in government by close friends of President Jacob Zuma.

The suspension of Anoj Singh was announced as the High Court ruled that it could not compel Zuma to set up a commission of inquiry into alleged influence-peddling by the Gupta family.

The opposition Democratic Alliance (DA) had asked the court to force Zuma to establish a commission based on a report last year by an anti-graft watchdog into allegations that brothers Ajay, Atul and Rajesh Gupta had swayed the appointment of ministers.

Singh was suspended pending an investigation into allegations he granted preferential treatment to bidders supplying coal to the state-owned firm.

Leaked emails, which Reuters has not been able to independently verify, suggested that Singh favoured companies controlled by members of the Gupta family.

Zuma, the Gupta brothers and Singh have denied the accusations.

The court said it could not compel Zuma to establish a commission of inquiry pending a judicial review on the report that called for the probe.

The president has challenged the report in court, arguing that the Public Protector had no right to ask him to form such a commission, as this was solely the president’s prerogative.

“To compel the President at this stage will not only be tantamount to denying the hearing or his day in court, but it will also be understood to mean the Public Protector’s powers are unassailable irrespective of the content of the decision,” Pretoria High Court Judge Motsamai Makume said.

“That cannot be correct,” the judge said.

New allegations of inappropriate collusion between state-owned companies and the Gupta brothers have put more pressure on Zuma and ministers close to him.

But the court ruling was a boost for the scandal-plagued Zuma at a difficult time.

Allegations of widespread corruption and the raiding of taxpayer funds by outside interests — known locally as ‘state capture’ — have dented investor confidence in an economy which fell into a recession earlier in 2017.

On Wednesday, thousands of South Africans marched in anti-corruption protests in a rallying cry against Zuma and his allies three months before a new African National Congress leader is chosen.

Zuma also survived a no-confidence vote in parliament in August but he lost the support of a number of ANC MPs, showing deep divisions within the party that has ruled South Africa since the end of apartheid in 1994.

Prolong probes

The DA said it had noted the court ruling “with interest”, saying it approached the court to avoid delays in probing influence-peddling allegations.

“On a number of occasions, including before the National Assembly, President Zuma has stated that he will establish a Commission of Inquiry. To date, he has not done so,” DA spokesman James Selfe said.

Some analysts said the legal battles would only prolong probes into the influence-peddling allegations.

“Ultimately its negative for “state capture”. It’s not going to bring any finality to what’s been going on,” NKC African Economics analyst Gary van Staden said. 

VIDEOS

COMMENTS   8

Sort by:
  • Oldest first
  • Newest first
  • Top voted

You must be signed in and an Insider Gold subscriber to comment.

SUBSCRIBE NOW SIGN IN

Just a disciplinary hearing?

Will anyone in the private sector hire him? put it to the test please?

In China -at this point-his family would be collecting an urn and paying for some lead….

I knew Brian Molefe was serving Gupta interests the day he moved with this man from Transnet to Eskom. Singh has all the details, hopefully he will turn state witness should we ever get the Guptas before a judge.

Why not this for an example, only then will our corruptors start to think twice, we lack law!

HANOI (Reuters) – A court in Vietnam sentenced to death a former chairman of state -run PetroVietnam on Friday after finding him guilty in a mass trial of 51 officials and bankers accused of graft and mismanagement that led to losses of $69 million.

http://www.reuters.com/article/us-vietnam-security/vietnam-court-sentences-to-death-petrovietnam-ex-chairman-in-mass-trial-idUSKCN1C40KW

It should be a criminal trial, not a disciplinary.

Molefe and Anoj don’t have to work any more. Transnet and Eskom has already made them multi millionaires. They probably will get away with slap on their hands.

does suspension mean all benefits :salary medical aid pension are all suspended all legal expenses in representation by lawyers at his hearings will be for his account??

End of comments.

LATEST CURRENCIES  

USD / ZAR
GBP / ZAR
EUR / ZAR
BTC / USD

Podcasts

INSIDER SUBSCRIPTION APP VIDEOS RADIO / LISTEN LIVE SHOP OFFERS WEBINARS NEWSLETTERS TRENDING

Follow us:

Search Articles:
Click a Company: