You are currently viewing our desktop site, do you want to download our app instead?
Moneyweb Android App Moneyweb iOS App Moneyweb Mobile Web App
Join our mailing list to receive top business news every weekday morning.

Nampak’s results: worse than the warning suggested

Shareholders dump millions of shares over a few days.
The company reported a comprehensive loss of R2.3bn, compared with a profit of just less than R873m in its previous financial year. Image: Moneyweb

The way investors have been dumping Nampak shares in the past few days creates the impression that shareholders and management are looking at two completely different sets of results for the financial year to September 2019.

Management warned shareholders on November 25 that earnings and headline earnings per share (EPS) would decline dramatically, with headline EPS expected to drop by between 67% and 72%. The real figure came in at 54.1 cents – 69% lower than the 173 cents reported for the year to September 2018.

Shareholders seem to have opted to focus on the bottom line of the income statement, which showed that Nampak actually suffered a comprehensive loss of R2.3 billion in the last year, compared with a profit of just less than R873 million in the previous financial year.

Their reaction was nothing short of brutal, sending the share price down nearly 26% from R7.40 at the time of the trading update to only R5.50 after the announcement of the results two days later.

Nampak share price takes a beating

Nearly 1.3 million shares traded on November 25 alone, valued at more than R8 million. The share price reached its lowest level in more than ten years and is now nearly 90% lower than the peak of R44 in February 2015.

Another million shares traded on Tuesday, dropping as low as R5.35.

Nampak’s market capitalisation declined from more than R40 billion in 2015 to less than R3.7 billion on Tuesday.

The results for the year to September show that profit took a hit from write-downs of more than R1 billion against the Zimbabwean operations, comprising net foreign exchange losses of R1.9 billion and a positive adjustment of R832 million due to hyperinflation in Zimbabwe.

Ironic twist

It also includes a profit of R795 million on a currency hedge Nampak negotiated with the Reserve Bank of Zimbabwe, but in an ironic twist this was written down by 85% (R719 million) as an expected credit loss. It seems that management realised – a bit late – that the Reserve Bank of Zimbabwe won’t be able to honour the commitment.

That left an operating profit of only R254 million, which was shallowed up by net interest paid of R246 million.

Interestingly, Nampak succeeded in paying R396 million tax on its profit of R6 million for an effective tax rate of nearly 6 600%.

Add the losses of nearly R800 million from businesses that Nampak put up for sale and classified as discontinued operations and shareholders stare at a total loss of R2.3 billion. Luckily, direct interest in subsidiaries shoulder part of the losses, which leaves Nampak shareholders with a loss of R1.13 billion.

Basic earnings per share are reflected as a negative R1.32 compared with the earnings of 76 cents per share in the previous financial year.

The other view

However, one gets a total different picture of Nampak when reading management’s commentary to the results.

In a press release titled ‘Nampak announces good operating performance’, outgoing CEO Andre de Ruyter says the businesses in the group operated well and that Nampak has managed to mitigate the impact of weak macro-economic conditions and increasing competition by managing factors within its control. He concludes that the packaging company produced good results.

Shareholders would tend to disagree.

Revenue declined by around 8%, while operating margins also declined from nearly 10% to less than 9%, before all the write-offs needed in the Zimbabwean businesses.

Management says that removing the impact of net foreign exchange losses in Zimbabwe would see normalised headline EPS of R1.58.

This figure might give shareholders a bit of hope, especially the optimists who have been buying the millions of shares that sellers have been dumping.

The share price of R5.50 and headline EPS of R1.58 would put Nampak on a price/earnings ratio of less than 3.5 times.

Maybe the buyers are seeing something the sellers are not. They might see the normalised EPS figure as realistic and be hoping for recovery in the underlying businesses.

Read: Finding opportunity in unloved shares

Nampak did say that the Zimbabwean business has been written down to nothing and that it is self-funding. It mentioned in the commentary to the results that it stopped extending credit to Nampak Zimbabwe in April 2018.

Nampak is determined to reduce debt, something that has become common among a lot of SA companies lately. It is set to raise R1.9 billion from asset sales and expects to receive the proceeds within the next few months.

Long-term loans have already declined by nearly R1.9 billion during the past year and total long-term liabilities by more than R2 billion. Current liabilities increased slightly, by R400 million, mostly due to the current portion of long-term debt due in the next 12 months.

The cash flow statement shows that net cash flow before financing activities increased to nearly R1.1 billion, compared with R323 million in the prior year, which means that a valuation of the share price on cash flow basis would yield a much better result than only looking at the low earnings figures.

In addition, management concluded in a presentation to shareholders and fund managers that it made a lot of progress in adjusting its portfolio of businesses to the current economic reality and improved its operations.

Shareholders can only hope that this is indeed the case, and that Nampak appoints a new CEO who can deliver profits and dividends.

Read: Eskom’s De Ruyter is no stranger to business adversity

Nampak celebrated its 50th birthday in 2019, and the new financial year will probably be just as important as 1969 as the year things started to improve.

AUTHOR PROFILE

COMMENTS   11

Sort by:
  • Oldest first
  • Newest first
  • Top voted

You must be signed in to comment.

SIGN IN SIGN UP

Nampak’s Andre de Ruyter appointed as Eskom CEO…..

Is this the man who is supposed to save Eskom….Shouldn’t we be worried?

No! It shows how clever he is. He knows when to jump ship. Our ANC cadres seem to hang on despite mountains of incriminating evidence. He can start a new trend and teach the cadres how to read the writing on the wall….

Zim will bankrupt Nampak the same way it will ESKOM.

Andre de Ruyter has stuffed up Nampak. Now he will stuff up ESKOM. Ummm, no sorry that has already happened..?!

And now the guy who did all this is jumping ship and is going to lead Eskom. Why, when they finally have the courage to appoint someone not based on race to lead Eskom, they choose someone as incompetent as this?

No courage displayed here. They needed a fall guy, as there is no saving Eskom. So, welcome the much disparaged white male , especially one seemingly not qualified for the job.

Please could someone explain to me how Nampak managed to pay R396 million tax on profit of R6 million.?

And how do you do a deal with the Reserve Bank of Zimbabwe..? Even I know that the best they could do would be to pay attention.

So we have what seems to be a someone who is severely challenged in the common sense department, with zero accounting skills and he is now going to fix ESKOM..?

Looks like there is a problem in this article as that highlighted quote is nowhere to be found in the body itself.

I also wanted to know how so much tax could be possible.

They simply have enough cash and cash equivalents to make that payment to SARS and that does not have to align or correspond to the profit made.

They gave Caesar what belongs to Caesar or maybe Nampak will make that money from Eskom in some way…..

Seems our Eskom glory boy is not quite covered in glory.

Maybe cardboard is not his thing…………

Not commenting on AdR, but general environment
The profit motive/growing markets and looking for profitable business seemed second to holding :
– Ad nasuem safety meetings ( i mean come on a management dedicating 60% of their time to safety)
– BBS cards, weekly records !!! The importance really really showing
– 3 Point contact to walk down stairs.
Above alienated a whole group of senior management team, their eventual departure off no doubt manifesting into results above
Properties sold a on a sale and leaseback will ensure the downward trend continue
Share price still overpriced imo

End of comments.

LATEST CURRENCIES  

USD / ZAR
GBP / ZAR
EUR / ZAR

Podcasts

NEWSLETTERS WEB APP SHOP PORTFOLIO TOOL TRENDING CPD HUB

Follow us:

Search Articles:Advanced Search
Click a Company: