You are currently viewing our desktop site, do you want to visit our Mobile web app instead?
 Registered users can save articles to their personal articles list. Login here or sign up here

PPC and AfriSam: What an ugly couple

What will the PIC sacrifice to make this match?

Later this month cement heavyweight PPC will hold its annual general meeting (AGM) and shareholders will be able to question the board and management on the proposed merger with rival AfriSam that was announced in February

So far very little detail has been disclosed and with AfriSam remaining unlisted, shareholders are mostly in the dark.

AfriSam is currently majority-owned by the Public Investment Corporation (PIC), on behalf of government pensioners, at almost 60%. The Phembani Group owns about 30%, making it the other major shareholder.

Since its establishment in 2007 AfriSam has been a questionable investment. At the time the transaction was politically charged with then-president Thabo Mbeki dedicating one of his famous newsletters to dispel notions that the seller Swiss Holcim AG was disinvesting from South Africa and praised the milestone establishment of a black cement producer.

Answers about the funding model were few and far between and a few years later analysts’ fears were proven to be founded.

In short, by 2012 the PIC had to step in to prevent AfriSam defaulting on its unsustainable mountain of debt. By the time the debt restructuring was done, the PIC had invested R9.3 billion and landed itself about 60% of the cement producer. Holcim wrote off R3.5 billion and AfriSam’s debt had been reduced by R15 billion to R6.5 billion. Phembani, until then a major creditor of AfriSam, took a stake of about 30%.

It seems as if the shareholding has remained largely unchanged.

It is not clear what AfriSam’s current debt position is but PPC, when it announced the proposed transaction, told its shareholders a prerequisite to the transaction is that the “merged entity will have similar levels of gearing to PPC with sufficient financial liquidity”.

Thanks to a recent rights offer PPC managed to reduce its gross debt in the previous financial year from R9.2 billion to R5.7 billion in March this year. The net debt/Ebitda ratio stood at 2.3x at the time.

It therefore seems that if AfriSam’s debt levels remained largely unchanged this requirement might see the PIC make a further write-off.

Charl Kocks, corporate governance expert at Ratings Afrika, questions the role of the PIC in the proposed transaction. He points out that the PIC also holds a 15.17% stake in PPC. Shareholders would therefore be justified if they ask whose interest the PIC will serve. How keen is it to get rid of or reduce its stake in AfriSam and how far would it go to see this, a second attempt at the merger, succeed?

Kocks says the merger does not make sense for PPC shareholders. PPC currently earns 78% of its revenue in South Africa, but demand is sluggish with pressure on sales prices due to new entrants who also brought more capacity to the market.

The AfriSam merger would hardly bring the geographical diversification PPC needs to mitigate its troubles in the local market, Kocks says.

He asks whether the recent departure of PPC CEO Darryl Castle has anything to do with the merger.

In fact, both companies are currently operating with acting CEOs.

PPC itself has had its share of trouble and shareholders have seen significant value destruction over the past few years.

The share price at its current level of R3.82 is almost 86% lower than five years ago.

In 2014 a bruising boardroom battle saw the departure of Ketso Gordhan as CEO after he was blocked from removing CFO Tryphosa Romano. Romano still holds the same position.

Last year Standard & Poor’s downgraded PPC to junk status. This resulted in a liquidity crisis as the company’s bonds were called. An insider puts the cost of the debacle at more than R350 million and PPC attributed its headline earnings per share drop of 93% to the downgrade. Cash flow from operations dropped by 22%.

PPC has further warned that impairments are on the horizon regarding its investment in new capacity in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC). The $300 million project cost was not ring-fenced like PPC’s other African projects. GDP growth in the DRC is slow and the cement market suffers as a result of surplus production capacity and pressure from importers.

To add insult to injury, PPC is non-compliant with the Mining Charter as it lost its empowerment status following the unwind of its empowerment deal.

The AfriSam merger can improve PPC’s empowerment credentials, but PPC has announced that it is working on an independent empowerment transaction as well.

The fact is, neither bride nor groom seem to be very attractive at this stage.

Even if they do decide to proceed, the Competition Commission might not approve.

PPC shareholders would be justified in asking serious questions about the cost of the proposed wedding, since they might end up paying the price.

Get access to Moneyweb's financial intelligence and support quality journalism for only
R63/month or R630/year.
Sign up here, cancel at any time.

AUTHOR PROFILE

COMMENTS   4

To comment, you must be registered and logged in.

LOGIN HERE

Don't have an account?
Sign up for FREE

“praised the milestone establishment of a black cement producer”, now the “milestone” is just a “stone” of no value, and pensioners money again wasted on political personal show.

eeehhh maybe these clowns can call a ”white capitalist ” to
save the day
Holcim must be having a giggle back in comfy Switzerland
Recipe for disaster = Pic + Bbeee commie politicians turned businessmen LOL

Load All 4 Comments
End of comments.

LATEST CURRENCIES  

USD / ZAR
GBP / ZAR
EUR / ZAR

Podcasts

SHOP NEWSLETTERS TRENDING CPD HUB

Follow us:

Search Articles:Advanced Search
Click a Company: