You are currently viewing our desktop site, do you want to download our app instead?
Moneyweb Android App Moneyweb iOS App Moneyweb Mobile Web App

NEW SENS search and JSE share prices

More about the app

Retail property sector hardest hit, says Dipula CEO

No agreement yet with major clothing retailers on rentals due for initial lockdown period.
Izak Petersen, CEO of Dipula Income Fund, has warned that SME retail tenants, such as salons and restaurants, may not survive the lockdown. Image: Getty Images

Most major clothing retailers, mid-sized fashion groups and small independent stores have still not paid rent for either April or May due to trading restrictions related to the Covid-19 lockdown, Dipula Income Fund CEO Izak Petersen said on Tuesday.

Speaking during an interim results webcast presentation to analysts, Petersen raised concerns around the retail property sector, especially the non-payment of rent and worries that many SME retail tenants may go out of business.

Read: Covid-19: Priority is to save smaller retailers, say landlords

“Retail property has been the hardest hit sector of the commercial property industry in relation to the impact of the Covid-19 lockdown…. Restrictions to retail were quite harsh at the beginning of the lockdown. For Dipula, around half (48%) of our retail space was operational, through essential service retailers operating,” he said.

Diplua Income Fund CEO, Izak Petersen. Image: Supplied

“The biggest issue for us is that many of the larger and medium retailers, not trading in essential goods [at the time], have not paid rentals,” Petersen noted, adding that Dipula has received 69% of retail rentals due for April and so far around 66% of the rent for May.

This is compared with collecting around 94% of rentals in April for office sector tenants and 73% of rentals for its overall property portfolio (retail, office, industrial and residential).

The non-payment of rent by major clothing- and other retailers during the initial lockdown period has been a major sticking point for the South African real estate investment trust (Reit) industry. Moneyweb first reported on the issue on March 30, just a few days into the lockdown.

Retail landlords face rental troubles over Covid-19 lockdown
Lockdown: JSE-listed retail giants offer landlords a fifth of rent

Since then the Property Industry Group (representing listed Reits) and the Retailer Group (representing clothing retail giants Pepkor, TFG, Truworths, Mr Price and Woolworths) have been formed to come to some sort of resolution. The Retailer Group is offering to pay 20% of rent for the initial lockdown period, while the Property Industry Group has upped its proposed rental discount to 70% for major retailers.

During Dipula’s results presentation, Petersen did not specifically mention which major retailers had not paid rent for April and May. However, he said his fund backed the Property Industry Group’s efforts.

“Things are very complex, and no deal has been secured yet, following proposals and counter proposals,” he said, after earlier bemoaning some views that “landlords have unlimited access to cash”.

Property industry wants government mediation in retail rent dispute
Major malls will still be hit hard if Edcon business rescue fails

He noted that a bigger issue is whether SME retail tenants, such as salons and restaurants, survive the lockdown. “We are supportive of the Property Industry Group’s initiative to support retail tenants, especially smaller players, but will have to evaluate each tenant on a case by case basis,” he said.

Petersen warned that while Dipula had reduced overall vacancies from 8% to 5.8% for its half year to February 29, 2020, vacancies are likely to worsen due to the Covid-19 economic fallout.

“The impact could see vacancies increasing by between 3.3% and 6.2%…. This means that in our worst-case scenario, overall vacancies could double from 5.8% [at half year], to 12%.”

Responding to questions from listed property sector analysts later, he said that with the easing of the lockdown in May, clothing retailers had seen a spike in trade.

“We can’t base things on one good month of trade…. I don’t see great trading conditions going forward, but it is good that they are now trading,” he added.

Dividends deferred

Meanwhile, Dipula reported a reasonable set of half year results, with revenue and distributable earnings for the period roughly in line with the prior period, at R680 million (H1 2019: R688 million) and  R254 million (H1 2019: R258 million), respectively.

In line with similar moves by many other Reits, the fund has opted to defer paying out dividends for the interim period. It will retain the R254 million in distributable earnings to strengthen its balance sheet in the face of Covid-19 uncertainty.

Nesi Chetty, senior listed property fund manager at Stanlib, said: “Dipula has made the right decision to defer its dividend declaration until August, when there will hopefully be a lot more clarity in the market.”

He noted that the group’s share is trading at a combined 64% discount to its NAV (net asset value), adding that this “reflects a lot of the risks” relating to lower rentals and deteriorating liquidity.

Read: Growthpoint provides rent relief to nearly 1 500 small firms

“The [rental] collection cycle for retail has been tough for Dipula in the month of April and May…. In their portfolio the biggest concerns will be SME tenants and the viability of their business models. Smaller businesses will burn through cash very quick in lockdown,” he added.

“Getting to lockdown level 1 quicker will also help, with the fund likely to be in a better position to collect more rental and improve its topline,” said Chetty.

Please consider contributing as little as R20 in appreciation of our quality independent financial journalism.



Sort by:
  • Oldest first
  • Newest first
  • Top voted

You must be signed in to comment.


That’s now, at the ‘earthquake’, but at the, ‘tsunami’ it will probably be the residential sector.

Tell us something we don’t know

The landlords should be ONLY giving the small / independent retailers relief.

The larger retailers get their relief through discounted rates compared to the smaller / independent retailers, as well as anti-competitive rights as “anchor” tenants.

You obviously don’t understand risk management.

Big retailers are more likely to pay,and get better deals , they also have better bargaining power.

The smaller guys, pay more because they are higher risk. No subsidy anywhere.

Same reason why everyone doesn’t get the exact same % on their bond.

Isn’t it interesting that your argument sounds intelligent, but is actually gibberish.

As recent events have shown, big retail tenants are just as big a risk as small tenants, and in fact riskier – since they can use the threat of common doom to bully the creditors.

The fact is that corporate SA is a nest of cartels, and that’s why the big boys get better deals.

Okay so you are saying that This worldwide lockdown , which is the first in the history of mankind , makes big retailers just as risky as an SME from a landlord perspective.

That’s absurd.

The fact is big corporates , generally have cash and are safer bets than the one man show.

It is what it is, and many of these little guys , don’t pay VAT and tax.

Corporates get a bad rep, my always warranted.

it’s ironic… normally the BIG guys brag in the statements of Financial Overviews… that the cash VAULTS are SO STRONG & there is plenty in the kitty.. !!! & then as soon as the paw-paw hits the fan… everyone is pleading poverty..& then even with my highlights in my hair over the couple of years.. EVEN the smaller CA groups request rental freebies!!!..hence their clients cannot pay THEM… it’s a nice domino effect… best ride further over the globe… warmest regards!!

End of comments.





Follow us:

Search Articles: Advanced Search
Click a Company: