You are currently viewing our desktop site, do you want to download our app instead?
Moneyweb Android App Moneyweb iOS App Moneyweb Mobile Web App

NEW SENS search and JSE share prices

More about the app

Sasol’s excessive non-exec pay irks activist shareholders

The out-of-town allowance non-execs receive for attending one board meeting in the current financial year exceeds Sasol’s minimum annual wage.
Image: Waldo Swiegers, Bloomberg

Sasol has been slammed for double-standards in its approach to remuneration, with an activist shareholder group noting that as part of Business Leadership South Africa the chemicals and fuels giant has urged government to rein in public sector wages – while at the same time it is paying out excessively generous fees to its own non-executive directors.

“The level of increases in non-executive directors’ fees over the past decade [is] excessive,” writes Active Shareholder in its proxy advisory report ahead of the upcoming Sasol annual general meeting (AGM).

Active Shareholder is a not-for-profit company that acts to “help socially-responsible shareholders exercise their company rights.”

The out-of-town allowance that will be paid to non-executive directors for attending just one board meeting during the current financial year will exceed Sasol’s minimum annual wage of R221 146. “This is totally unacceptable given that employee salaries have been frozen and the company is part of a call to halt government salary and wage increases,” said Bishop Jo Seoka, chairman of Active Shareholder, a proxy adviser to ethical investors. “What message are they sending to their staff?” asked Seoka, who said this sort of behaviour seems to him to be unethical.

Seoka says the additional hundreds of thousands of rands that non-executive directors stand to collect from the out-of-town allowances paid for this year’s four scheduled board meetings, makes a mockery of claims that the company is concerned about pay inequality.

The allowances were approved by shareholders at the 2019 AGM, but 2021 will be the first year they are due to be paid out.

The allowance is over and above the cost of travel and accommodation, which is paid for by Sasol.

Sasol is the second large South African-based multi-national company to announce generous out-of-town allowances for its non-executive directors. Earlier this year Naspers announced it would be paying its non-executive directors a daily allowance of R62 500, “when traveling and attending meetings outside home country”.

Naspers: a prime example of the randomness of exec pay
Naspers AGM: The antithesis of shareholder democracy

The Sasol allowance is based on the time spent flying to the board meeting and will vary from R86 800 to R260 400 per board meeting. Sasol’s remuneration committee explains that the allowance “is a travel fee which is to compensate for the inconvenience, as well as all costs associated with the travel” excluding flight and accommodation costs which are covered by Sasol.

The remuneration report refers to the increased focus on pay gap reporting across the globe, which, says Sasol, many consider to be a measure that promotes a fairer and more equal society. “This rings hollow when a non-executive director is paid more as a travel allowance than a worker is paid for a full year’s work,” says Seoka.

Active Shareholder is also irked by remuneration committee chairman Mpho Nkeli’s comment in her remuneration report that, “There is no doubt that in the new year all of us will need to reset our expectations and look as reward-related matters in a different way”. Active Shareholder’s head analyst Mike Martin says there’s little evidence of such a reset in Sasol’s approach to remuneration.

Martin points out that while this year’s fees – excluding allowances – will not be increased,

…Sasol’s non-executive directors’ fees have shot up 300% over the past ten years. This is considerably more than the inflation rate in SA or the US over that period.

In a move that echoes concerns raised by Just Share earlier this year, Active Shareholder recommends voting against the re-appointment of Trixie Kennealy and Nomgando Matyumza to Sasol’s audit committee. Both Kennealy and Matyumza also serve on the Standard Bank Group board and its audit committee. “We do not favour directors serving together on the boards of different companies as this can be too cosy and comfortable. It is of particular concern when it comes to the audit committee,” says Martin.

Seoka urged institutional investors to take responsibility for their investments and not let boards run companies for their own benefit rather than that of the millions of ordinary investors.

Read: Financial sector executives are getting richer




Sort by:
  • Oldest first
  • Newest first
  • Top voted

You must be signed in and an Insider Gold subscriber to comment.


Have they ever heard of Zoom, Skype or MS Teams?

Don’t spoil the party, this is all part of the G&T brigade. Business done by lunch relax for a few days.

Later all the financial shenanigans come out, and guess what no one knew anything at all……..

Maybe Sasol should compare its payroll with industry standards and trim if necessary to save money and not rely on Tax breaks.

Maybe you and detractors should look at what Shell, Total, Exxon Mobil etc board members earn — You will find that the SASOL people are really paid a pittance in world terms.

Oh ja capitalism is not flavour of the decades in SA ne!!

Sorry @casper1, but when you are selling 50% of a $12-Billion asset for $2-Billion, you’re not Capitalising but just cashing in to fund your gravy train…

The shareholder returns are being eaten by the board and management.
Lack of leadership from the board who are supposed to represent the shareholder interests.
This is the board of a company whose strategy has been responsible for value destruction on a huge scale, which will affect pensions of most South Africans.
An example of rent seeking by a small pool of company directors.

Agreed that management and board members should have their remuneration (or at least a portion of it) linked to dividend payouts or the increase in value added attributable to internal factors. External factors such as the price of oil, exchange rates etc. are a function of the market although effective anticipation of such changes can be beneficial if wisely acted upon. The problem of course is how to differentiate between luck and effective enterprise management. In addition decisions taken in the less than recent past can not necessarily be blamed on the current management incumbents. Complex yes, but if certain standards could be developed to give comfort to shareholders and other stakeholders that the broad management team is fairly and consistency rewarded “capitalism” would have a better chance of defence.

I think capitalism should really come into play here …… pay must be linked to the share price and the dividend ! Not so pretty now ……..

Maybe there is a correlation with the amount of value destruction.

Well the value destruction measure seems to apply to the ruling party and its patronage network.

Wonder what the nature, extent and quality of the contributions of these Board members really are, seeing that the financial performances/results of Sasol are largely determined by the international oil price over which the Company has no control.

End of comments.





Follow us:

Search Articles:
Click a Company: