MENU
 Registered users can save articles to their personal articles list. Login here or sign up here
  Author profile
In this story
 
  5 COMMENTS

  Good for those retailers. Having an unlimited variety of suppliers will obviously create additional costs for an industry already working on very small margins. Once gain the %4@#20&&39eu) pee...  

 Registered users can save articles to their personal articles list. Login here or sign up here

Small suppliers want a slice of big retailers’ supply network

CompCom hears how supplier development initiatives of grocery retailers exclude small producers.

The big four grocery retailers – Shoprite, Pick n Pay, Spar and Massmart – should be compelled to source products they sell from small producers in order to curb anti-competitive behaviour in SA’s retail industry, it was recommended to the Competition Commission.

The commission’s grocery retail market inquiry heard fresh complaints last week from KwaZulu-Natal-based emerging suppliers on how the dominance of SA’s big four grocery retailers leaves little room for them to grow.

Despite the four big retailers having enterprise and supplier development initiatives, they have been accused by small players of not stocking their products at stores.

The supplier development initiatives of big retailers are intended to support small businesses by procuring goods and providing them with access to their retail shelves. Retailers typically favour large producers who can guarantee volumes and quality of goods.

Among the retailers accused of not integrating emerging producers into their supply chain network is Massmart, the operator of Game, Makro, DionWired, Builders Warehouse and others.

Thabo Gininda, the owner of Ingola Trading, which manufactures soup and spices, accused Massmart of not stocking his products after being part of the retailer’s supplier development course in 2015.

He told the inquiry that upon the completion of the course, his expectation was for Masscash to stock his soup and spice products. Masscash is a division of Massmart with brands including Jumbo Cash and Carry, Saverite Supermarkets and others.

Gininda claimed that after he completed the course, discussions with Massmart began about supplying the retailer with his products. The products, he told the inquiry, were later subjected to health and nutrition tests.

“After the tests, the products were given a certificate so that they could be sold to the public,” he said, adding that the products were never introduced in Massmart’s shelves.

However, Massmart disputed Givinda’s version of events, saying the reason was because his products didn’t meet the retailer’s supply development programme requirements, including having a formal product line and owning a production facility to manufacture his products.

Givinda confirmed the latter at the inquiry, saying that he uses a third party to manufacture the products.

“We did attempt to assist Mr Gininda with training by enrolling him in a small business management programme at Gibs, however, no commitment was made to list products from entrepreneurs enrolled in the course [in Massmart’s stores],” Massmart’s spokesperson Annaleigh Vallie told Moneyweb.

The purpose of the inquiry is to examine the general state of competition in the grocery retail sector as the commission has reason to believe that there are features in the sector that may prevent, distort or restrict competition.

Sanjay Lutchman, a manufacturer of bottled water, said big retailers ask hefty payments before putting products of smaller retailers on shelves, which disadvantages smaller producers and hinders their ability to compete. He added when retailers eventually stock their goods, smaller producers usually have to pay a “kickback”, which is a payment reward to retailers.

“Big retailers want a percentage of our profits (or a kickback) at the end of the year. They want to see the number of sales and want me to reward them for stocking my products.”

“Despite having to pay for bottles, caps and labels to manufacture bottled water, big retailers don’t want to hear about our costs. They just want their kickbacks, which is 5% to 10% of our profits.”

Responding to challenges faced by small producers, the former CEO and now director of retailer Spar Wayne Hook said the group sourced 20% or R15 billion worth of its goods annually from local suppliers. In SA, Spar operates 823 grocery stores, of which 98% are owned by independent entrepreneurs.

Hook said the remaining 80% of the stock is sourced from the group’s distribution warehouses or drop shipments (store owners purchasing directly from manufacturers).

Hook added that most suppliers don’t have the capacity to supply its group, hence the 20% level of goods stocked from small producers. Spar is developing suppliers from a farming perspective, as it’s supporting “30 to 40” farmers that would supply its outlets, he said.

Entrepreneur in need of resources?

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
More stories from Moneyweb
David Kop

David Kop

The Financial Planning Institute of Southern Africa (FPI)
Moneyweb Click an Advisor
   5 comments

To comment, you must be registered and logged in.

LOGIN HERE

Don't have an account?
Sign up here

Then all consumers should get used to seeing empty shelves every day with “out of stock notices” on the shelves because the small suppliers can produce every other Monday, Wednesday and then again maybe Tuesday next week. That is why the big four want suppliers who can produce a constant reliable supply of good quality products. But once again our leaders want a communist state where everybody is equally poor (except for the small elite of course).

Agree with all comments. Another attempt by the authorities to interfere with free-market principles / business.

Then the (uneducated) will complain why suddenly the cost of groceries gone way up and too expensive (due to forced upon supply chain inefficiencies). And this will be from the people who can least afford more expensive groceries.

S’Africans got to let go off the “we want” notion. Who gave the largest 4 chains their supply chains?? (No sir, over the years they build it up for themselves, worked to make it happen in order to supply cheapest possible to the public. Everyone benefits..all creeds)
My challenge to small suppliers: come on, up your game and improve your efficiencies/reliability and am sure if you add better value to the chain, the large stores will notice the opportunity/value and will deal also with you instead. Learn how the large suppliers did it.

Due to Govt interference into SA business (red tape/ over-regulation) I wonder how much cheaper ALL S’Africans would pay for everyday things…anything that is produced here, from food to manufacturing to electricity other utilities / municipal etc etc.

Good for those retailers.

Having an unlimited variety of suppliers will obviously create additional costs for an industry already working on very small margins.

Once gain the %4@#20&&39eu) peeple in the world trying to tell highly sophisticated retailers how to do business. This from those that hold their hands out for a freebie at every opportunity.

Latest Currencies

ZAR / USD
ZAR / GBP
ZAR / Euro

MONEYWEB NEWSLETTERS

Subscribe to our mailing list

* indicates required
Moneyweb newsletters

Podcasts

Moneyweb Investor Issue 26

Yes, recession is stifling the economy and dirty politics darkens our discourse, but that is today. There are those who are planning for a better, brighter tomorrow. We talk to Chris van der Merwe, founder of Curro, about how he plans to transform tertiary education for the greater good with his new company, Stadio.

Follow us:

Search Articles:Advanced Search
Click a Company:
server: 172.17.0.2